The Virtual Pub
Come Inside... => The Snug => Topic started by: Nick on November 12, 2007, 09:24:25 AM
-
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?view=DETAILS&grid=&xml=/news/2007/11/12/db1201.xml (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?view=DETAILS&grid=&xml=/news/2007/11/12/db1201.xml)
You'd have got on with him!
-
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?view=DETAILS&grid=&xml=/news/2007/11/12/db1201.xml (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?view=DETAILS&grid=&xml=/news/2007/11/12/db1201.xml)
You'd have got on with him!
Nick, donning my 'The Affs' hat, may I suggest that you try to keep up?
See this thread (http://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/index.php?topic=2087.0) (to which you contributed) for the original of this!
OK?
-
And this is for Growler's edification.
I am surrounded by idiots
-
No just the unlearned ::)
-
He has been the lead story on every news bulleting for 3 days for some reason. You'd have to live in SLough or ROck Ferry not to have heard of him!
Norman Mailer that is!
-
He has been the lead story on every news bulleting for 3 days for some reason. You'd have to live in SLough or ROck Ferry not to have heard of him!
Norman Mailer that is!
Who?
-
NORMAN MAILER
I am surrounded by idiots evil: eeek: eeek: eeek: point: point: bs: bs: rubschin: rubschin:
-
NORMAN MAILER
I am surrounded by idiots evil: eeek: eeek: eeek: point: point: bs: bs: rubschin: rubschin:
Was he in "The Young Ones"?
-
Stick to Turkeys!
-
NORMAN MAILER
I am surrounded by idiots evil: eeek: eeek: eeek: point: point: bs: bs: rubschin: rubschin:
Ahh Yes I remember "He who died on Saturday aged 84, was a novelist, journalist, film-maker and relentlessly tedious controversialist".
::)
-
Ahh Yes I remember "He who died on Saturday aged 84, was a novelist, journalist, film-maker and relentlessly tedious controversialist".
::)
eeek: eeek: eeek: eeek: eeek:
Nick is dead!!
Is it "the Boy" posting in his style then?
-
Ahh Yes I remember "He who died on Saturday aged 84, was a novelist, journalist, film-maker and relentlessly tedious controversialist".
::)
eeek: eeek: eeek: eeek: eeek:
Nick is dead!!
Is it "the Boy" posting in his style then?
No. I said "controversialist".
Would you accuse Nick of THAT?
-
k?
-
Welcome!
-
k?
It is unbecoming of you to waste time and energy on unnecessary scribble.
Why bother to go to all that effort to type "k" when the lone "?" would have sufficed?
::)
-
would have sufficed
rubschin:
"Would suffice" would suffice.
No need for past tense.
-
Que?
-
would have sufficed
rubschin:
"Would suffice" would suffice.
No need for past tense.
Why? It was a historical event I was commenting on.
They have a tendency to have happened in the past.
-
It was a historical event I was commenting on.
"On which I was commenting".
::)
-
Heavens!
-
Sorry, I have backache today and nobody else to snap at. redface:
-
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=XOT4BCNAUNFOFQFIQMFCFGGAVCBQYIV0?view=DETAILS&grid=&xml=/news/2007/11/09/db0904.xml (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=XOT4BCNAUNFOFQFIQMFCFGGAVCBQYIV0?view=DETAILS&grid=&xml=/news/2007/11/09/db0904.xml)
Read on geriatrics
-
Sorry, I have backache today and nobody else to snap at. redface:
Backache eh? And carpet burns? eyes:
-
Sorry, I have backache today and nobody else to snap at. redface:
Backache eh? And carpet burns? eyes:
cussing:
-
Sorry, I have backache today and nobody else to snap at. redface:
Backache eh? And carpet burns? eyes:
cussing:
I take it that's a NO! then.
-
Sorry, I have backache today and nobody else to snap at. redface:
Backache eh? And carpet burns? eyes:
cussing:
I take it that's a NO! then.
If it were YES, then I should be in better humour and less grumbly about the sore back wouldn't I? Angry9:
-
scared2: Touchy as well.