The Virtual Pub
Come Inside... => Saloon Bar => Topic started by: Miss Demeanour on June 22, 2009, 07:21:21 AM
-
I mean the ones produced for girls - whistle:
They are producing a new one on the market - because all the other erotica magazines for women have been so succesful noooo: noooo: noooo:
"The founder, Suraya Singh, used to have a mundane job working for an education quango. Like millions of women the 30-year-old would often spend her lunch breaks perusing the women's magazine section at a nearby newsstand ......( personally I spend my lunch breaks eating but that's where I'm probably going wrong lol: ) .... she became increasingly despondent at the celebrity gossip, diet tips and fashion advice she was bombarded with. What she wanted was a classy erotica magazine that women like her would be happy to buy. Men's magazines regularly mixed aspirational and intelligent content with high-brow erotica " happy001 happy001 happy001
Sex will be strictly cerebral in a new top-shelf magazine for 'thinking women' ::) Next week she will launch Filament, eeek: a self-funded quarterly erotica magazine that is squarely aimed at turning women on. A glitzy launch party complete with male acrobats is planned for Monday and an initial print run of 5,000 copies has just rolled off the presses.
"Marketed as "the thinking woman's crumpet", the first issue features a semi-naked man in a praying position on its cover. Inside, artistic photoshoots of scantily clad male models are juxtaposed next to erotic short stories and erudite articles on off-beat topics such as the merits of being a geek. And if you tire of the sex, there's always a recipe for spicy celeriac bake to keep you busy."
The first issue has avoided full-frontal nudity noooo: - I have cancelled my subscription with immediate effect lol:
-
I mean the ones produced for girls - whistle:
Bah! Banghead
-
She is going for the gay readership noooo:
-
I mean the ones produced for girls - whistle:
Bah! Banghead
And how many seconds was it before you clicked on this topic happy001
-
I mean the ones produced for girls - whistle:
Bah! Banghead
And how many seconds was it before you clicked on this topic happy001
I was falsely attracted to this thread! cussing:
-
She is going for the gay readership noooo:
Exactly - so just promote it as such - not something for the modern 'thinking' woman - how feckin patronising does she want to be . This apparently is what 'a woman who thinks' looks like ::)
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.independent.co.uk%2Fmultimedia%2Farchive%2F00178%2FPg-09-erotica-mag-i_178242t.jpg&hash=7b91230494b66b339f4132fd02d34aae44a1e6cf)
-
She is going for the gay readership noooo:
Exactly - so just promote it as such - not something for the modern 'thinking' woman - how feckin patronising does she want to be . This apparently is what 'a woman who thinks' looks like ::)
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.independent.co.uk%2Fmultimedia%2Farchive%2F00178%2FPg-09-erotica-mag-i_178242t.jpg&hash=7b91230494b66b339f4132fd02d34aae44a1e6cf)
No wonder she thinks for herself.
Nobody is going to think about her. noooo:
-
She looks quite acceptable to me.
-
I'd do her eyes:
-
It's a bloke you pair of buffoons. ::)
-
eeek: noooo:
-
eeek: noooo:
point:
-
That is no bloke (is it) Is her name Lola? with a dark brown voice?
-
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.dailymail.co.uk%2Fi%2Fpix%2F2009%2F06%2F03%2Farticle-1190425-052F2DBA000005DC-92_233x423.jpg&hash=15a4c05571a3e1c71251f6a7d668d8f630446998)
That is her listening ear pose rubschin:
-
Do the cuffs match the collar I wonder rubschin:
-
The first issue has avoided full-frontal nudity - I have cancelled my subscription with immediate effect
I shall refrain from subscribing. angel1
I can appreciate a beautiful female body/form in a non lesbian sort of way, I can also drool appreciate a beautiful body on a bloke but would prefer that he kept his kecks on. I once saw the center spread in a girlie magazine, it featured a very attractive young man on a surf board, with his willy sort of flapping around it really did not do it for me. noooo:
-
It's a bloke you pair of buffoons. ::)
I don't think so DS noooo:
It's you that should have gone to:
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg3.imageshack.us%2Fimg3%2F1196%2F10953477.png&hash=824087b79d921e7cd7f4887c1365ad41789e78f8) (http://www.postimage.org/)
-
DS was too close to the Aga. His specs had steamed up prolly
-
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.dailymail.co.uk%2Fi%2Fpix%2F2009%2F06%2F03%2Farticle-1190425-052F2DBA000005DC-92_233x423.jpg&hash=15a4c05571a3e1c71251f6a7d668d8f630446998)
"Kevin from Felixtowe, pictured in The Queens Arms during the annual Fairy Ring pageant, still looking pale after his return from surgery in Amsterdam."
-
Keep digging DS. ::)
-
'She' does look a bit masculine like... whistle:
-
Which 'bit' would that be then?
-
She may be yet another unconvincing transvestite. There's a lot about. Look at Anne Widdecombe, for example
-
Which 'bit' would that be then?
Well, 'her' face for starters... imagine if 'she' had a more masculine hair cut... And no false boobs like... noooo:
-
Which 'bit' would that be then?
Square jaw, broad shoulders, protruding eyebrow ridge, huge testicles tucked up under the tee-shirt.
Need I go on?
I bet the voice is like Lee Marvin after 20 Capstans.
-
Which 'bit' would that be then?
Square jaw, broad shoulders, protruding eyebrow ridge, huge testicles tucked up under the tee-shirt.
Need I go on?
I bet the voice is like Lee Marvin after 20 Capstans.
lol: lol: lol:
-
Deffo a bloke then. That's sorted. What next?
-
"Well, nobody's perfect."
-
Mrs Nick thinks she is
-
Mrs Nick thinks she is
What, a man like?
-
::)
Perfick
(she's not)
-
Nick and Mrs Nick
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg41.imageshack.us%2Fimg41%2F1589%2F89056361.jpg&hash=ae1b03c133f06fe7663c87486c461395520c7cc1) (http://www.postimage.org/)
-
Nick and Mrs Nick
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg41.imageshack.us%2Fimg41%2F1589%2F89056361.jpg&hash=ae1b03c133f06fe7663c87486c461395520c7cc1) (http://www.postimage.org/)
Which one is Nick...? rubschin:
-
Nick is taller than Mrs Nick ~ I shall say no more. whistle:
-
Everyone is taller than Mrs Nick
-
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ficomefrommars.files.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F02%2Fworld__s_tallest_man1_robert_wadlow6.jpg&hash=ee604abf96c885e5ddc13f7ae057b4f870c63991)
-
Everyone is taller than Mrs Nick
Even a tiny person...? rubschin:
-
I have seen taller dwarfs/dwarves noooo:
-
I have seen taller dwarfs/dwarves noooo:
Taller than what? Shrugs:
-
::)
Mrs Nick
He's been at the Wincarnis again
-
How tall do you have to be before you are no longer classified as a Dwarf rubschin:
-
Everyone is taller than Mrs Nick
Well it explains the 'Napoleon Complex'
-
Quite so. She still has to do the 'Instruction du Jour' every morning cussing:
-
How tall do you have to be before you are no longer classified as a Dwarf rubschin:
4 feet ten and a half inches... Well, a quarter I suppose...
Dwarfism (pronounced /ˈdwɔrfɪzəm/) is a medical term describing a person of short stature. In Anglo Saxon world some defined it as being a person with an adult height of less than 4 feet 10 inches (147 cm).[1] However, the average height of the population group differ greatly by genetic and environment.
-
The first Mrs Snoopy was just 5 feet tall. Napoleon Complex included at no extra charge.
-
I suppose if a dwarf drank a lot of milk in childhood it could smash some sort of dwarfness record rubschin:
-
How tall do you have to be before you are no longer classified as a Dwarf rubschin:
4 feet ten and a half inches... Well, a quarter I suppose...
Dwarfism (pronounced /ˈdwɔrfɪzəm/) is a medical term describing a person of short stature. In Anglo Saxon world some defined it as being a person with an adult height of less than 4 feet 10 inches (147 cm).[1] However, the average height of the population group differ greatly by genetic and environment.
The extra half inch is always so important whistle:
-
shutup:
-
How tall do you have to be before you are no longer classified as a Dwarf rubschin:
4 feet ten and a half inches... Well, a quarter I suppose...
Dwarfism (pronounced /ˈdwɔrfɪzəm/) is a medical term describing a person of short stature. In Anglo Saxon world some defined it as being a person with an adult height of less than 4 feet 10 inches (147 cm).[1] However, the average height of the population group differ greatly by genetic and environment.
The extra half inch is always so important whistle:
Probably what got me into this mess in the first place.
-
lol: lol: lol: