The Virtual Pub

Come Inside... => Saloon Bar => Topic started by: Barman on September 28, 2009, 10:22:40 AM

Title: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Barman on September 28, 2009, 10:22:40 AM
Forces Broadcasting were proud of the Royal Navy drug bust this morning proclaiming that the haul was '5? tonnes of drugs'.

The BBC later reported the haul was 'equivalent to five small family cars'.

FFS!
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Snoopy on September 28, 2009, 10:26:01 AM
 rubschin: What's that in football pitches?
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Snoopy on September 28, 2009, 10:28:19 AM
Mind there's a f*ck of a lot of it  eeek:

(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.dailymail.co.uk%2Fi%2Fpix%2F2009%2F09%2F28%2Farticle-0-069AFC9B000005DC-984_634x399.jpg&hash=27fde3134489b3f25966da9650b20910d620cfde)
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Barman on September 28, 2009, 10:30:14 AM
rubschin: What's that in football pitches?
::)

Football pitches is area like...

I think it equals 0.7 double-decker buses...  ;)
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 28, 2009, 10:41:07 AM
'equivalent to five small family cars'.


Is that kerb weight?
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Barman on September 28, 2009, 10:44:26 AM
'equivalent to five small family cars'.


Is that kerb weight?
They didn't specify Uncle... nor the make or model...  noooo:
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Snoopy on September 28, 2009, 10:52:15 AM
Just put it down to the BBC being full of patronising b@st@rds who think none of us can possible know what any quantity looks like without their "helpful" and "patient" explanations ~ then throw something at the screen.
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 28, 2009, 11:24:17 AM
Not sure if that photo shows all of it either:

212 bales of cocaine, weighing about 26kg each

That's enough information, no need to bring small family cars in to it at all.
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Snoopy on September 28, 2009, 11:28:31 AM
And of course they fail to tell you that they are talking Tonnes rather than Tons ~ both sound the same on the wireless.

One tonne equals 1000 kg/2204.6 lb; equivalent to 0.9842 of an imperial ton.
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Miss Demeanour on September 28, 2009, 12:35:49 PM
What colour were the cars  rubschin:
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 28, 2009, 12:37:49 PM
White.
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Miss Demeanour on September 28, 2009, 12:40:18 PM
Dusty white, snorty white or injection white  rubschin:
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 28, 2009, 12:46:13 PM
Sorry I'm not very street-wise and up on that sort of thing. Why not ask your teenage daughter?  whistle:
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Miss Demeanour on September 28, 2009, 12:50:17 PM
That would involve a conversation ....sooooo not going to happen  noooo:
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Darwins Selection on September 28, 2009, 03:02:19 PM
Not sure if that photo shows all of it either:

212 bales of cocaine, weighing about 26kg each

That's enough information, no need to bring small family cars in to it at all.

About 2600 bags of sugar then?
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Snoopy on September 28, 2009, 03:15:17 PM
Would that be caster sugar or granulated, light brown or the dark treacly stuff? So many imponderables  noooo:


To be honest I was happy just knowing that it was a lot of nose candy.
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Darwins Selection on September 28, 2009, 03:35:37 PM
Would that be caster sugar or granulated, light brown or the dark treacly stuff? So many imponderables  noooo:


To be honest I was happy just knowing that it was a lot of nose candy.

I notice it also had a 'street value of ?250,000,000

What is that in Duck-houses?
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Snoopy on September 28, 2009, 03:41:32 PM
Lots!
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Pastis on September 28, 2009, 04:40:55 PM
I've been trying to find my pics of the Iron Duke but alas...  surrender:

We was parked up berthed alongside her in Antigua once and the crew were all deployed in tarting her up with a fresh lick of paint. The ratings were in full naval gear in the Caribbean sun with paint pots and brushes whilst the officers were strutting around in their whites. A Governor's cocktail party was in the offing apparently as they'd put red carpet out on the foredeck  ;D
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Snoopy on September 28, 2009, 04:46:23 PM

We was parked up berthed alongside

Equivalent of name dropping ~ speaking the right language.

I inadvertently let slip a bit of RAF terminology once when flying civvy. I referred to "the Driver" rather than "the Pilot" and was immediately outed as ex Transport Command by a bloke in the row across the aisle  lol:

All the RN "Park up" they never berth.
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Pastis on September 28, 2009, 04:59:14 PM
It's a fair cop guv'  lol:

Being on a MV, we were berthed (for the sake of the passengers) but being technically part of the crew I heard 'parked up' so many times ...  whistle:

It was a memorable experience to see a Frigate that close up and chatted to some the chaps working on her. Quite alarming to see a ship bristling with weaponry alongside a MV serving the tourist trade.

(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.postimage.org%2FTsGpyw0.jpg&hash=cada57388f2e589881fa6631b7e77041bb3abff8) (http://www.postimage.org/)
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Snoopy on September 28, 2009, 05:08:36 PM
Growing up in Southampton we often visited RN and US Navy vessels ~ nobody understood why I joined the RAF  whistle: (and I ain't telling you on here)
Biggest ship I have been on was/is the USS Dwight D Eisenhower
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcgreport.files.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F03%2Fike.jpg&hash=020c318477437e2e73b6aa40a64a78cdb8c4a3a4)
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Barman on September 29, 2009, 03:42:16 AM
It's a fair cop guv'  lol:

Being on a MV, we were berthed (for the sake of the passengers) but being technically part of the crew I heard 'parked up' so many times ...  whistle:

It was a memorable experience to see a Frigate that close up and chatted to some the chaps working on her. Quite alarming to see a ship bristling with weaponry alongside a MV serving the tourist trade.

(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.postimage.org%2FTsGpyw0.jpg&hash=cada57388f2e589881fa6631b7e77041bb3abff8) (http://www.postimage.org/)

You're lucky they didn't surrender to you!  lol:
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Miss Demeanour on September 29, 2009, 07:42:45 AM
Being a complete ignoramous I just had to look up what M/V stands for  redface:

Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Snoopy on September 29, 2009, 07:45:07 AM
Just stick to the coffee machine dear.  whistle:
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Miss Demeanour on September 29, 2009, 07:47:24 AM
with velcro, sellotape or superglue  rubschin:
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Snoopy on September 29, 2009, 07:51:13 AM
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fforbiddenplanet.co.uk%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F02%2FPeanuts%2520Snoopy%2520Lucy%2520Valentines%2520kiss.jpg&hash=a3aa4425cc143498ae9545ec8392a5c54336655f)
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Barman on September 29, 2009, 08:20:19 AM
Good grief - get a room you two!  sick2:
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Miss Demeanour on September 29, 2009, 08:28:14 AM
You not feeling the love BM  happy001
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Barman on September 29, 2009, 08:30:21 AM
You not feeling the love BM  happy001
No.  evil:
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Snoopy on September 29, 2009, 08:35:45 AM
You want me to feel it for you?  eeek:
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Barman on September 29, 2009, 08:43:31 AM
You want me to feel it for you?  eeek:
No.  evil:
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Miss Demeanour on September 29, 2009, 08:50:12 AM
BM is in a huff  whistle:
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Barman on September 29, 2009, 09:17:00 AM
BM is in a huff  whistle:
I am not!  cussing:
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Snoopy on September 29, 2009, 11:15:15 AM
BM is in a huff  whistle:
I am not!  cussing:

OOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooooooooo! Look at her with her knickers in a twist.  razz:
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Barman on November 20, 2009, 11:08:36 AM
doh:

This new submarine they've got is 'longer than ten double-decker buses' and the jetty 'longer than two football pitches'...

Bloody twice in one report!  Banghead
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Snoopy on November 20, 2009, 11:13:24 AM
Re-tune to Al-Jazeera ........... far better standard of reporting on their English Channel.
Title: Re: Sloppy BBC reporting # 86429
Post by: Barman on November 20, 2009, 11:28:59 AM
BFBS carries the BBC news....