The Virtual Pub

Come Inside... => The Sports Bar => Topic started by: Miss Demeanour on February 12, 2010, 09:31:56 AM

Title: Winter Olympics
Post by: Miss Demeanour on February 12, 2010, 09:31:56 AM
An event which effectively excludes half the world ? the warm half

More than 2,500 athletes from 82 countries, watched by 10,000 media, 250,000 spectators and three billion television viewers?

How could you not love a festival which can give you both the impression of a man flying (Franz Klammer?s blind madness in 1976) and a man falling off the edge of the world (Eddie the Eagle?s myopic fortitude in 1988)? Now that?s entertainment.

Maybe the equivalent this time will be America?s injured millionaire, Lindsey Vonn, battling through the physical pain barrier in her attempt at five golds while Kwame Nkrumah-Acheampong, the impoverished one-man Ghana ski team from Milton Keynes and soon to be our favourite Olympian, battles through the financial pain barrier as he attempts to not finish last.


So will we be watching much of this then  rubschin:

Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Pastis on February 12, 2010, 09:38:27 AM
Wimmin Ski Jumpers have had their application for Olympic status and competition rejected again.

Thought you'd like to know that.  rubschin:
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Miss Demeanour on February 12, 2010, 09:42:56 AM
I've never been skiing  rubschin:
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Nick on February 12, 2010, 09:43:54 AM
You should engage a personal instructor  point:
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Darwins Selection on February 12, 2010, 10:07:11 AM
Irish Womens bobsleigh team has problem with Brazilians  (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/winter-olympics/7215884/Winter-Olympics-2010-Irish-bobsleigh-team-must-wait-for-go-ahead.html)  eeek:
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Snoopy on February 12, 2010, 10:29:10 AM
An event which effectively excludes half the world ? the warm half

More than 2,500 athletes from 82 countries, watched by 10,000 media, 250,000 spectators and three billion television viewers?

How could you not love a festival which can give you both the impression of a man flying (Franz Klammer?s blind madness in 1976) and a man falling off the edge of the world (Eddie the Eagle?s myopic fortitude in 1988)? Now that?s entertainment.

Maybe the equivalent this time will be America?s injured millionaire, Lindsey Vonn, battling through the physical pain barrier in her attempt at five golds while Kwame Nkrumah-Acheampong, the impoverished one-man Ghana ski team from Milton Keynes and soon to be our favourite Olympian, battles through the financial pain barrier as he attempts to not finish last.


So will we be watching much of this then  rubschin:



No!

I shall however be watching the six nations rugby. cloud9:
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Miss Demeanour on February 12, 2010, 11:50:52 AM
Perhaps this might give you more reason to watch  whistle:

http://www.break.com/usercontent/2010/2/8/olympic-winter-babes-vancouver-2010-1728735 (http://www.break.com/usercontent/2010/2/8/olympic-winter-babes-vancouver-2010-1728735)
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Nick on February 12, 2010, 12:00:15 PM
That's just disgusterous, sexist and exploitative.  noooo:



















I will just watch it again to make sure I haven't misunderstood, like
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Snoopy on February 12, 2010, 02:38:33 PM
Nope ~ I'll stick with what I like  cloud9:

(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.telegraph.co.uk%2Ftelegraph%2Fmultimedia%2Farchive%2F01246%2Fbrian-moore_1246354c.jpg&hash=27b3ccc7c43c1806ab6c9226d82258f4e268c0c4)
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Nick on February 12, 2010, 02:45:58 PM
Poofter  point:
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Barman on February 12, 2010, 02:49:39 PM
I heard they didn't have any snow... for the Olympics like...?  Shrugs:
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Snoopy on February 12, 2010, 02:54:50 PM
Poofter  point:

Don't knock it until you've tried it. whistle:
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Nick on February 12, 2010, 02:56:35 PM
I don't like the vicar's leg  whistle:
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Snoopy on February 12, 2010, 03:00:40 PM
Well I can't sit here bandying words with you ~ a man has delivered a lot of logs and there is a distinct shortage of volunteer labour to put them away so it looks like I shall have to do it. This will take some time and will cause me to hurt a lot. I may even have a heart attack.
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Nick on February 12, 2010, 03:01:41 PM
I trust she has you insured
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Snoopy on February 12, 2010, 03:02:40 PM
I trust she has you insured

 noooo: Can't buy insurance when you are in my state.
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Nick on February 12, 2010, 03:03:43 PM
Perhaps the logman is wealthy  rubschin:
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Snoopy on February 12, 2010, 03:07:20 PM
B@st@rd should be given that he deals only in cash. People pay him to cut down trees and take away the wood which he then sells as logs.
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Nick on February 12, 2010, 03:08:57 PM
Ebrell?  eeek:
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Snoopy on February 12, 2010, 03:20:53 PM
Nah! This one is called Nigel. Built like a brick outhouse with 15 year old son to match ~ They are like two hooooooge bookends.
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Nick on February 12, 2010, 03:39:14 PM
Miss D would like them  eyes:
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Miss Demeanour on February 12, 2010, 03:44:08 PM
Oh yes - I'm well renowned for my passion for woodsmen  whistle:
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Nick on February 12, 2010, 03:45:57 PM
 shutup:
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: GROWLER on February 13, 2010, 02:34:17 PM
Oh yes - I'm well renowned for my passion for woodsmen  whistle:

I spend a lot of time in the woods, cloud9:  in fact I'm going to visit another one right now.
I may be gone for.....mmmm... rubschin:, forever!  happy088
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Nick on February 13, 2010, 02:37:04 PM
Take cake  angel1
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Pirate on February 13, 2010, 02:39:56 PM
and a flask of hot choccy
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Nick on February 13, 2010, 02:41:15 PM
and a bog roll  ::)
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: GROWLER on February 13, 2010, 03:03:54 PM
and a bog roll  ::)
  noooo:

Friendly rabbits suffice.

Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Barman on February 13, 2010, 03:05:25 PM
and a bog roll  ::)
  noooo:

Friendly rabbits suffice.



Are they friendly after tho...  rubschin:
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: GROWLER on February 13, 2010, 03:08:19 PM
and a bog roll  ::)
  noooo:

Friendly rabbits suffice.



Are they friendly after tho...  rubschin:

In my furry belly they are , yes.....mmmmmm, yumpster. Fully washed and skinned first like though, oh yes.
One gulp raw too. happy088
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Barman on February 13, 2010, 03:10:38 PM
and a bog roll  ::)
  noooo:

Friendly rabbits suffice.



Are they friendly after tho...  rubschin:

In my furry belly they are , yes.....mmmmmm, yumpster. Fully washed and skinned first like though, oh yes.
One gulp raw too. happy088

You wipe your arse on them and then eat them...?  sick2:
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: GROWLER on February 13, 2010, 03:18:29 PM
WASH them first.
Do keep up and p'raps clean yer glasses ey BM.  ::)

However,and in your defence, I do fully appreciate you've got quite a bit on yer paws presently. ;)

I'm off to the woods now anyway. cloud9:
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Pastis on February 13, 2010, 06:07:08 PM
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs2.postimage.org%2FtMy6J.jpg&hash=e129de84df23ca2bcac94f4b9bcff9f34f70c495) (http://www.postimage.org/)

 noooo: noooo: noooo:  scared2:

Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Barman on February 13, 2010, 06:56:07 PM
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs2.postimage.org%2FtMy6J.jpg&hash=e129de84df23ca2bcac94f4b9bcff9f34f70c495) (http://www.postimage.org/)

 noooo: noooo: noooo:  scared2:



I'd do that!  cloud9:
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Miss Demeanour on February 13, 2010, 06:56:57 PM
I'd push you  whistle:
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Barman on February 13, 2010, 06:58:05 PM
I'd push you  whistle:

I'd let you!  ;D
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Pastis on February 13, 2010, 07:09:01 PM
And look what happened... the pillock looked up, flew off the track and hit an upright at 92 MPH   noooo:
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Barman on February 13, 2010, 07:10:18 PM
And look what happened... the pillock looked up, flew off the track and hit an upright at 92 MPH   noooo:

Quick way to go tho...  cloud9:
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: GROWLER on February 13, 2010, 10:03:34 PM
And look what happened... the pillock looked up, flew off the track and hit an upright at 92 MPH   noooo:

Quick way to go tho...  cloud9:

Best way to go too ey?  rubschin:

Which would you rather, dying in a NHS hossy in probable agony for weeks on end with tubes sticking out of every orifice, or dying instantly doing something you enjoy?

Don't mean to sound too flippant about this, more matter of fact tbqh, but we've probably all had to go through seeing someone near and dear suffering, and I tell you, it scares the living shit out of me, BIG time.
Massive 'eart attack and coughing me clogs there and then climbing 'me 'ill' will do for me when the time finally arrives.
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Nick on February 14, 2010, 04:09:13 AM
Or we could arrange to have you shot. As a surprise, like  angel1
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Barman on February 14, 2010, 07:12:07 AM
And look what happened... the pillock looked up, flew off the track and hit an upright at 92 MPH   noooo:

Quick way to go tho...  cloud9:

Best way to go too ey?  rubschin:

Which would you rather, dying in a NHS hossy in probable agony for weeks on end with tubes sticking out of every orifice, or dying instantly doing something you enjoy?

Don't mean to sound too flippant about this, more matter of fact tbqh, but we've probably all had to go through seeing someone near and dear suffering, and I tell you, it scares the living shit out of me, BIG time.
Massive 'eart attack and coughing me clogs there and then climbing 'me 'ill' will do for me when the time finally arrives.

Agreed...

The wonders of modern medical science mean that most of us will live long enough to die a prolonged and agonising death from cancer or pass away with dementia in a care home with nurses having to feed us and wipe our arse.

Not for me...  noooo:
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Pirate on February 14, 2010, 09:22:54 AM
Or we could arrange to have you shot. As a surprise, like  angel1

Have gun, will travel
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Tipsy Gipsy on February 14, 2010, 09:25:10 AM
There is always the one way trip to Switzerland option, could combine it with skiing.  lol:
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Darwins Selection on February 14, 2010, 05:22:08 PM
. . nurses having to feed us and wipe our arse.

Not all bad then?
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Barman on February 14, 2010, 05:23:05 PM
. . nurses having to feed us and wipe our arse.

Not all bad then?

 lol: lol: lol:

Ask Snoopy....
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: TG on February 20, 2010, 02:39:46 PM
 eeek: A gong! And a shiny one at that.

The Canadians are moaning that she had the wrong hat on but have been told to feck off.  point:

Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Miss Demeanour on February 20, 2010, 03:01:08 PM
Lets hurtle down a hill on a tea tray  at ridiculous speeds ....looks terrifying  scared2:

Well done that girl  happy088
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: GROWLER on February 20, 2010, 03:17:37 PM
Lets hurtle down a hill on a tea tray  at ridiculous speeds ....looks terrifying  scared2:

Well done that girl  happy088

Yes, most excellent, but why oh why can't we win proper serious like events ey?  Shrugs:

I'm not detracting away from the glory of us winning summat that is undoubtably very dangerous, but come on.............tea tray sliding?  confused:
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Nick on February 20, 2010, 04:45:02 PM
YOu could have a go at that on yer '?ll  angel1
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Barman on February 20, 2010, 07:13:06 PM
She is well fit an all innit...?  eyes:
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: GROWLER on February 21, 2010, 10:20:22 PM
She is well fit an all innit...?  eyes:

Absogorgeouslylutely. Well fit, and talks proper too.  cloud9:

You been watching those nutters in the Ski Cross event! happy088

Now THAT is a proper event. Be even better in off roaders though ey BM?
Studded tyres and stuff and even bigger jumps.
I'd defo 'ave some of that, oh yesss! cloud9:
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Grumpmeister on March 01, 2010, 08:46:01 PM
I see Medvedev is a tad upset about Russia's performance. I do like the line about helping the officials if they don't resign. Something tells me fired may have a different meaning here.  whistle:

Quote
President Dmitry Medvedev has called on Russian Olympic officials to resign, following the nation's worst ever performance in the winter games.

Those in charge of preparing Russian athletes for the Vancouver games "should take the brave decision and submit their resignations," he said.

"If they cannot do it, we will help them," Mr Medvedev added.

Russia - traditionally a winter sports powerhouse - ended 11th in the medals table, with just three golds.

"For a long time we have benefited from Soviet achievements, at some point they ran out," President Medvedev said at a meeting of the governing United Russia party on Monday.

He urged a change to the system of preparing Russian athletes, ahead of the next Winter Olympics, in the southern Russian city of Sochi.

Russia has experienced a steady decline in its Olympic performances since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.

The games in Vancouver were particularly painful for the nation because of the failures in sports such as ice hockey and figure skating.
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Uncle Mort on March 02, 2010, 08:58:51 AM
Someone should tell him it's the taking part that counts.  happy001
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: Miss Demeanour on March 02, 2010, 09:01:53 AM
Britain are confident that they will have their most successful Winter Olympics for seven decades by aiming to win three medals in Vancouver.

Funding body UK Sport believes the target is achievable after investing ?6.5m over the four-year cycle leading up to February's Games.



 noooo: noooo: noooo:

?6.5 million pounds = 1 medal
Title: Re: Winter Olympics
Post by: toffee on March 02, 2010, 03:10:00 PM
Britain are confident that they will have their most successful Winter Olympics for seven decades by aiming to win three medals in Vancouver.

Funding body UK Sport believes the target is achievable after investing ?6.5m over the four-year cycle leading up to February's Games.



 noooo: noooo: noooo:

?6.5 million pounds = 1 medal

Ahhhh -but it's all about the taking part thinggy!!!! ::)
B.


P.S. Did anyone even think about 2012 in Londinium cost-wise????  No, not the pollytishans evil:
B.