Post by: Berek on July 26, 2007, 08:05:25 AM
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91210-1277025,00.html
Post by: Barman on July 26, 2007, 08:07:18 AM
I see the parents are starting to take some flak. Hardly surprising.It was somewhat inevitable ? I?m surprised it has taken so long.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91210-1277025,00.html
Post by: GROWLER on July 26, 2007, 08:33:24 AM
I see the parents are starting to take some flak. Hardly surprising.It was somewhat inevitable ? I?m surprised it has taken so long.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91210-1277025,00.html
It was morally wrong what they did.
IIRC it is also illegal in this country to leave a child under the age of....i dunno, 10 is it??? without an adult over the age of....i dunno, 15 is it???? being in the same house/building?
Popping in every half hour was simply not good enough, the same being JUST 20 yards away or whatever the distance was.
Post by: Barman on July 26, 2007, 08:56:56 AM
I agree with you?I see the parents are starting to take some flak. Hardly surprising.It was somewhat inevitable ? I?m surprised it has taken so long.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91210-1277025,00.html
It was morally wrong what they did.
Popping in every half hour was simply not good enough, the same being JUST 20 yards away or whatever the distance was.
The sad fact is that if they had not been well educated professionals the media would have torn them to pieces on day 1.
Post by: Snoopy on July 26, 2007, 09:07:41 AM
I see the parents are starting to take some flak. Hardly surprising.It was somewhat inevitable ? I?m surprised it has taken so long.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91210-1277025,00.html
It was morally wrong what they did.
IIRC it is also illegal in this country to leave a child under the age of....i dunno, 10 is it??? without an adult over the age of....i dunno, 15 is it???? being in the same house/building?
Popping in every half hour was simply not good enough, the same being JUST 20 yards away or whatever the distance was.
The parents were, without doubt, guilty of not taking sufficient care of their children but they were doing what many do. I do not condone that ~ just making the point. As said elsewhere we have never left our children with anyone or on their own. We have not had an evening out of the home as a couple in 14 years. Either the children are with us or we don't go out. Mrs S has her WI and such like and before I got so ill I would have an evening off and have a pint with my brother BUT one of us was always with the children.
As for the age at which children may be left ~ we had a case of that recently when the village bobby and I noted that a certain family were in the habit of leaving the 10 year old girl, in charge of her 5 yo brother and pissing off for a weekend in Prague or somewhere. The bobby asked me what I knew, as they were neighbours, and I was happy to oblige.
Plod went to the Social Services for advice plus chapter and verse on the law in the matter. He was warned off and the SS said that as far as they were concerned the 11yo was "responsible" enough to take care of her brother. Age, they said, had nothing to do with it. Plod, like me had assumed that the minimum age that a child may be left alone or in charge of younger siblings was 13. When the parents returned Plod "Had a word" and was assured that Granny (aged about 85) lived half a mile away and her phone number had been left with the children in case they needed any help. Needless to say we got an earbashing from the neighbour for feeding her kids and having them into play with ours and were told we were "interfering gits etc". Mr Plod then stepped on the husbands neck quite firmly and they had a long discussion about balding tyres, tax discs, driving habits, drinking habits etc.
There is, as Mr Plod said, more than one way to skin a cat.
Point is that the law is no longer clear on these matters and it depends on the interpretation [which probably means the mood (hormone state) and work load] of the SS officer you speak to. And yes I use the abbreviation SS with intent.
Post by: GROWLER on July 26, 2007, 09:33:35 AM
I mean, WHAT punishment could any court issue, that could compare to the punishment that this couple are currently living with and will presumably have to carry on living ...it seems so far....for the rest of their lives?
Post by: Snoopy on July 26, 2007, 09:36:34 AM
On saying all this, and agreeing with fellow boozers, I really don't think prosecuting the parents will achieve anything.
I mean, WHAT punishment could any court issue, that could compare to the punishment that this couple are currently living with and will presumably have to carry on living ...it seems so far....for the rest of their lives?
Absolutely ~ they have to live with this for the rest of their days.
Post by: Bar Wench on July 26, 2007, 09:37:34 AM
It won't happen though. It was the double standard that I didn't like.
Post by: Barman on July 26, 2007, 09:40:16 AM
Post by: Misunderstood on July 26, 2007, 09:42:16 AM
I have always been aghast at the innocent 'single mother syndrome' where the existence of a child or two, has - by a happy coincidence - secured a council house and then been pressed into a term of servitude to the 'grateful' parent.
And, if they are really good - or noisy - they'll get to share mum's crack or whatever flavour is de rigor at the time.
Seeing what is goes on around me, I am sometimes inclined to support mandatory licencing to breed.
Post by: Mr Happy on July 26, 2007, 09:47:05 AM
As for age of responsibility it is obvious to all with slightly more cranial capacity than the average doctor, the girl was three years old. Looking after herself was unlikely as she couldn't tie her laces, looking after her younger twin siblings eeek:
I also feel differently about the prosecution of these two. Many seem to think they are undergoing a harsh punishment, even if somewhat less harsh than the girl herself. However, they produced her in a little glass jar so it is possible they've been looking for a method of disposal for sometime, she was obviously preventing them having a nice coq au vin. Also, freeing up a cell for these two would allow the prison service to release 'Lynton' a 23 year old immigrant serving 9 months for killing a granny for ?4.83 and a packet of Blue Ribband biscuits. Result!
Post by: TG on July 26, 2007, 10:00:58 AM
http://www.thisisleicestershire.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=132384&command=displayContent&sourceNode=232710&home=yes&more_nodeId1=132393&contentPK=17919016
" Editor Nick Carter said: "We encourage feedback to our website, but we have to monitor what is said to make sure people are not posting comments that might be libelous, breach the law in any way or cause gratuitous offence "
The Sky news editors comments on the article cited by Berek are incisive :
"The Leicester Mercury's response to the abusers and defamers - to ban all comments - seems to me to be disproportionate and wrongheaded," said Bucks.
"Banning all debate because of the extreme behaviour of the few seems like a desperate decision to throw the baby out with the bathwater and one that should be discouraged in a free media."
There you have it. The Mercury is frightened of being sued. scared2:
And maybe Sky can afford better lawyers than a provincial rag.
Post by: Mr Happy on July 26, 2007, 10:25:21 AM
Quote
Mr McCann said: "We have been advised that, legally, our behaviour was well within the bounds of responsible parenting..."
Oh that's fine then.
Quote
From the moment we discovered Madeleine missing, Kate and I have done everything in our power to try to help get her back
Oh that's fine then.
Quote
The real issue is that we should not have a constant fear of abduction of our children from their bedrooms, gardens, or streets, for that matter
A constant fear you say. "I'll have a bottle of the house red and some reassurance that my child wont be abducted whilst I leave her at risk in favour of Anglo-Tapas fine cuisine"
Quote
We were essentially performing our own baby listening service
Excuse me a second...
happy001 shocked003 :lalalala char048 char090
Quote
A tiny minority of people seem to want to say nasty, spiteful and defamatory things about the McCann family. They are bombarding our site
For tiny minority should we read between the lines and summise that it was the majority, otherwise simply ban a few ISP addresses. Also, did the original site make it clear that the newspaper welcomes all comments so long as they fit in with their own agenda offering sympathy as opposed to criticising the idiot parents?
I would stop the wife's housekeeping if she spent it on this shite!
Post by: Berek on July 26, 2007, 12:04:19 PM
http://www.express.co.uk/comments/viewall/14347
LIARS! LIAR! LIARS!
24.07.07, 11:49am
The McCanns dined out every night of their holiday while their poor children slept alone. They are lucky that this happened on the night they chose to dine in the tapas bar and not Tuesday for example when they dined in Chaplins, below their beloved church, near the beach, 8 times the distance away. They never once checked on their children as they claim, ask the staff! Talk to elderly Mrs. Senn who lives above and she'll tell you on that particular Tuesday night she had to sit listening to one of the children "screeming, crying" from 22:30 til 23:45. They went to dinner around 19:00h. Those poor, poor children. Yes, they should be prosecuted. How DARE they preach to other parents and try to teach us safety measures to ensure our children are safe from predators? How DARE they take the positions of heroes? How DARE they commit this crime upon poor Madeleine? Yes, they did it. If a child was abandoned on a rock surrounded by ocean, fell in and was eaten by a shark, who would you prosecute? The shark? They delivered their baby to her predator. I fear for Sean and Amelie. They haven't "learnt their lesson" as some idiots keep saying. They deny doing anything wrong and still galavant around the globe doing their holier than thou parade while their remaining children are left to (I'm positive) much more competent care. Why did they use the creche all day every day and decline the night time services? Why, when staff got worried did they also decline the monitoring services? What were they afraid of us monitoring? Stop protecting these monsters. Stop raising them to saintliness. They're criminals. Why are people so PC? If they had been Portuguese they'd have been charged within hours and their twins removed from them. I just hope that whoever took Madeleine took her because they witnessed her parents' total lack of care and thought she deserved better. There are lunatics out there who'd do such a thing. We have 2 seperate issues here, please stop getting them confused. We have a poor missing little baby who has been taken away from her family. We have a complete separate issue: two so called parents who committed crime (on a regular basis). YES they should be prosecuted. YES, YES, YES.
Post by: Marley's Ghost (Imbiber of Spirits) on July 26, 2007, 12:47:35 PM
Of course there are - and always has been - children that are loved, or despised or just simple meal tickets.
I have always been aghast at the innocent 'single mother syndrome' where the existence of a child or two, has - by a happy coincidence - secured a council house and then been pressed into a term of servitude to the 'grateful' parent.
And, if they are really good - or noisy - they'll get to share mum's crack or whatever flavour is de rigor at the time.
Seeing what is goes on around me, I am sometimes inclined to support mandatory licencing to breed.
You're not seriously suggesting incest are you ? eeek:
Post by: Mr Happy on July 27, 2007, 12:42:41 PM
Lock them up for being pretentious twats if for nothing else!
Post by: Bar Wench on July 27, 2007, 12:44:33 PM
Post by: Mr Happy on July 27, 2007, 12:47:04 PM
Personally I think the other two should have been taken into care and I do wonder if the fact that the woman has refused to come back yet means the same thought has occured to her.
She has thoughts...?
Post by: Barman on July 27, 2007, 12:49:19 PM
Only for herself... noooo:Personally I think the other two should have been taken into care and I do wonder if the fact that the woman has refused to come back yet means the same thought has occured to her.
She has thoughts...?
Post by: Misunderstood on July 28, 2007, 12:36:50 AM
I'm half expecting little Maddie to turn up at a Aunt's house in Rotherham when they remember that was where she had gone the day before..... confused:
Post by: Barman on July 29, 2007, 08:14:28 AM
Well you've got to admit it's been a hell of a holiday so far, There wasn't many people that went to Portugal and ended up meeting the Pope was there? confused:A world-tour, meet the pope and have ?1M in the bank donated by the simple-minded. Quite a holiday indeed? noooo:
I'm half expecting little Maddie to turn up at a Aunt's house in Rotherham when they remember that was where she had gone the day before..... confused:
Post by: Anise on July 29, 2007, 08:51:17 AM
Well you've got to admit it's been a hell of a holiday so far, There wasn't many people that went to Portugal and ended up meeting the Pope was there? confused:A world-tour, meet the pope and have ?1M in the bank donated by the simple-minded. Quite a holiday indeed… noooo:
I'm half expecting little Maddie to turn up at a Aunt's house in Rotherham when they remember that was where she had gone the day before..... confused:
So you'd sell your 4 year old daughter to a sex murderer for a visit to the Vatican, a whistlestop tour of global press conferences and cash?
You really do disgust me noooo:
Post by: Snoopy on July 29, 2007, 08:54:45 AM
That's an awful lot of assumptions just to say how we disgust you.Well you've got to admit it's been a hell of a holiday so far, There wasn't many people that went to Portugal and ended up meeting the Pope was there? confused:A world-tour, meet the pope and have ?1M in the bank donated by the simple-minded. Quite a holiday indeed? noooo:
I'm half expecting little Maddie to turn up at a Aunt's house in Rotherham when they remember that was where she had gone the day before..... confused:
So you'd sell your 4 year old daughter to a sex murderer for a visit to the Vatican, a whistlestop tour of global press conferences and cash?
You really do disgust me noooo:
Be disgusted with us by all means but please don't put words in our mouths.
Post by: Barman on July 29, 2007, 09:13:24 AM
Um.... no. noooo:Well you've got to admit it's been a hell of a holiday so far, There wasn't many people that went to Portugal and ended up meeting the Pope was there? confused:A world-tour, meet the pope and have ?1M in the bank donated by the simple-minded. Quite a holiday indeed? noooo:
I'm half expecting little Maddie to turn up at a Aunt's house in Rotherham when they remember that was where she had gone the day before..... confused:
So you'd sell your 4 year old daughter to a sex murderer for a visit to the Vatican, a whistlestop tour of global press conferences and cash?
You really do disgust me noooo:
As Snoopy said, be disgusted by all means but not at us - none of us here would have left the child in the first place.
Post by: Misunderstood on July 29, 2007, 12:17:24 PM
She could read. ;)
Post by: Barman on July 29, 2007, 01:14:15 PM
For all of Kim's faults, she had one thing going for her.....lol: lol:
She could read. ;)
Post by: Snoopy on August 04, 2007, 01:06:26 PM
Post by: GROWLER on August 04, 2007, 01:23:03 PM
::) this time British Police are assisting the Portuguese rozzers.
Lets hope the Portugese like Doghnuts then.
Post by: Mr Happy on August 04, 2007, 01:26:14 PM
I see they are searching Robert Murat's home AGAIN ~ this time British Police are assisting the Portuguese rozzers.
It could ntake up to 4 days! Was this child minute or can the average perv purchase a massive house in Portugal?
Somebody sent me a video (well a powerpoint slideshow) on Facebook the other day, sad background music and:
Maddie missin for ova 100 days
A luvin mum and dad
went on holiday
went 4 a dinna
Checked kidz afta half hour
Checked again and she woz gone
The person that sent the message entitled it 'Terrible Isn't It'
I have to agree, the standard of education in this country is terrible.
I have now been removed as their friend. Yipee, my first rejection. I did ask what their issue is and pointed out that I felt for the child and have a hatred of anybody who harms children, including her parents. No answer.
It's an emotive subject and I'm sure some people will dislike some of the criticisms aimed at the parents. One fact that i feel is not open to question is the fact that the parents were negligent at best.
If she is found do you think she will be taken into care?
Post by: Shy Talk on August 05, 2007, 04:32:33 PM
For all of Kim's faults, she had one thing going for her.....
She could read. ;)
WAKE UP Bouncer !!!!! THATS NOT OUR KIMMY Banghead Banghead Banghead
Post by: Bar Wench on August 05, 2007, 06:37:33 PM
For all of Kim's faults, she had one thing going for her.....
She could read. ;)
WAKE UP Bouncer !!!!! THATS NOT OUR KIMMY Banghead Banghead Banghead
Ummm I think Boucer was being sarcastic. ;)
Post by: Snoopy on August 05, 2007, 06:45:19 PM
For all of Kim's faults, she had one thing going for her.....
She could read. ;)
WAKE UP Bouncer !!!!! THATS NOT OUR KIMMY Banghead Banghead Banghead
Ummm I think Boucer was being sarcastic. ;)
eeek: Bouncer sarcastic ~ surely not eeek:
Post by: Sour Puss on August 05, 2007, 06:58:58 PM
Oh yes Bouncer does Sarcastic better than most.For all of Kim's faults, she had one thing going for her.....
She could read. ;)
WAKE UP Bouncer !!!!! THATS NOT OUR KIMMY Banghead Banghead Banghead
Ummm I think Boucer was being sarcastic. ;)
eeek: Bouncer sarcastic ~ surely not eeek:
Confused person, with query....? Please can someone explain to me why the post from the seagull is followed by the post from the puppy which has a quote from the Bar wench who does not appear to have posted??? It's all too much for me I am going back to bed. rubschin: surrender:
Post by: Snoopy on August 05, 2007, 07:02:50 PM
Confused person, with query....? Please can someone explain to me why the post from the seagull is followed by the post from the puppy which has a quote from the Bar wench who does not appear to have posted??? It's all too much for me I am going back to bed. rubschin: surrender:For all of Kim's faults, she had one thing going for her.....
She could read. ;)
WAKE UP Bouncer !!!!! THATS NOT OUR KIMMY Banghead Banghead Banghead
Ummm I think Boucer was being sarcastic. ;)
eeek: Bouncer sarcastic ~ surely not eeek:Oh yes Bouncer does Sarcastic better than most.
I assume Wench decided to remove her post as she has the right to do. No need to seek the comfort of the duvet ~ or do you sleep in a basket?
Oh and I WAS being sarcastic (I think our American friends prefer to call it Irony)
Post by: Bar Wench on August 05, 2007, 07:36:47 PM
Post by: Sour Puss on August 05, 2007, 10:06:06 PM
No need to seek the comfort of the duvet ~ or do you sleep in a basket?
Oh and I WAS being sarcastic (I think our American friends prefer to call it Irony)
I have a day bed, a nice fluffy thing, suspended over the radiator, by the picture window, warm summer and winter and a good lookout point for B I R D S in MY garden as well as a nice big bed for night use. Don't have a duvet, dumped it a year ago cos it was too hot. It was one of those 2 part ones, 4.5 tog for summer and 10.5 for spring and autumn and both together for winter. Since I moved a year ago, I cannot even use the 4.5 in the winter. I think there is a whole lot more insulation here, which coupled with the underfloor heating, makes the place into a sauna. I am currently looking for a zip in my fur, as it sticks in my teeth when I pull it out in clumps. confused:
Post by: Misunderstood on August 06, 2007, 12:19:59 AM
Post by: Berek on August 07, 2007, 11:17:43 AM
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
!!
Post by: Barman on August 07, 2007, 11:18:54 AM
blood in the apartmentSmoking gun? rubschin:
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
!!
Post by: Bar Wench on August 07, 2007, 11:19:18 AM
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
!!
source?
Post by: Barman on August 07, 2007, 11:22:53 AM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6934322.stmblood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
blood in the apartment
!!
source?
Post by: Bar Wench on August 07, 2007, 11:25:55 AM
Post by: Barman on August 07, 2007, 11:27:30 AM
taAnd just about every other news service...
Police suspect Madeleine was murdered
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/rtrs/20070807/tts-uk-portugal-madeleine-blood-62c696a_2.html
Post by: Bar Wench on August 07, 2007, 11:35:25 AM
Post by: Barman on August 07, 2007, 11:36:19 AM
Some interesting points. Was there ever actually any evidence that it was an abduction? Or did we all just assume it was?I think most of us assumed the parents did it from the start? whistle:
Post by: Darwins Selection on August 07, 2007, 11:47:06 AM
They are trying to establish a) Is it Blood? b) Is it from the girl?
The chances of finding traces of amost anything smeared around a holiday place like that must be pretty high.
Have they checked for Polonium yet?
Post by: Berek on August 07, 2007, 12:00:23 PM
Post by: Mr Happy on August 07, 2007, 09:22:34 PM
Scenario: Mr & Mrs Feckless-Parents went out for meal came home and found dead daughter. Worried about custodial sentance for neglect and/or removal of other kids panicked and disposed of said child. Went out for meal the following night and she disappeared.
Breaking News - Police are checking a car that the McCant's hired two weeks AFTER the girl went missing - they suspect something.
Alternative News Form Brit Media - A new suspect has been identified:
Quote
The 67-year-old committed suicide last Wednesday and there is DNA evidence linking him to a five-year-old who vanished the day before.
He is reported to have been on holiday in the Algarve when four-year-old Madeleine disappeared in May.
Convenient!
Post by: Soobear on August 07, 2007, 09:36:23 PM
Where are the twins while ma and pa are looking for Maddy? Or maybe they don't need their parents.
Post by: Mr Happy on August 07, 2007, 09:40:45 PM
Where are the twins while ma and pa are looking for Maddy? Or maybe they don't need their parents.
Tucked up safe and sound in a shoe box, M6 central reservation I believe...
Post by: Barman on August 08, 2007, 06:37:20 AM
Did anyone see the girl the day she was apparently abducted?
Scenario: Mr & Mrs Feckless-Parents went out for meal came home and found dead daughter. Worried about custodial sentance for neglect and/or removal of other kids panicked and disposed of said child. Went out for meal the following night and she disappeared.
Breaking News - Police are checking a car that the McCant's hired two weeks AFTER the girl went missing - they suspect something.
Alternative News Form Brit Media - A new suspect has been identified:QuoteThe 67-year-old committed suicide last Wednesday and there is DNA evidence linking him to a five-year-old who vanished the day before.
He is reported to have been on holiday in the Algarve when four-year-old Madeleine disappeared in May.
Convenient!
Quote from: BBC Web Site
Over the past 48 hours, police have also re-examined up to 10 vehicles, including a hire car rented by Gerry and Kate McCann about five weeks after the disappearance of their daughter.
Five weeks!
WTF did they need to hire a car for then ? they had stretched limousines, private jets and helicopters available by that time. Hell, the main man would have lent them his popemobile if they?d needed transport!
Also...
Quote from: BBC Web Site
Some Portuguese newspapers reported on Tuesday that detectives now suspect Madeleine died in the holiday flat in Praia da Luz on 3 May - the night she disappeared.
Detectives in Portugal are refusing to comment officially on those reports.
A police spokesman has told BBC News there were "some indications" she had not been alive when she had been taken but the possibility had not been discounted.
Why aren?t the McCanns in custody? If there is any indication that she died in the room it is surely beyond belief that her murderer/abductor brought cleaning materials and tidied the place up afterwards?
Post by: Berek on August 08, 2007, 10:07:16 AM
Post by: Mr Happy on August 13, 2007, 07:14:30 PM
Quote
I'd rather know if Madeline was dead than live in limbo
She's proving to be a terrible inconvenience
Quote
You don't expect a predator to break in and take your daughter. I always had this little prayer i'd say at night - please keep them safe, healthy and happy
Note to self, don't use god as a babysitter. And I personally do fear that somebody may harm my children, I take every precaution and miss the odd night out.
Quote
If she is dead I'd be comforted by the belief that she's in a better place
If she's alive there's a good chance she's in a better place than the hands of 'parents' like you.
Quote
In the States a Police report has to be filed within two hours of a child being taken. The response time in Europe has to be quicker
Firstly, you don't know when within two hours was, you were out on the lash. Differences in law and procedure between countries is quite common and this is the most shocking example of deflecting the blame that I've seen, perhaps they want to run for Parliament.
Quote
She told Womans Own magazine
Is this a new part of the campaign? I expect somebody may have accidentaly taken Madeline believing it to be their cat, George. Now they've read Woman's Own they'll be aware of their error and return her. You may laugh but god works in mysterious ways...
The newspapers continue to refer to them being religious, show pictures of them leaving church and refer to their professional status. They are scum!
And put that f'ing rabbit down you stupid censored:
Next Week on The McCanns:
How we've dressed twin 2 as Madeline and changed her name...
Post by: Berek on August 13, 2007, 08:24:06 PM
Post by: Mr Happy on August 13, 2007, 08:30:03 PM
Maddies devestated parents and that feckin rabbit. There's stuff going on in the world that needs mentioning, I will happily read the paper when the two chumps are arrested!
Post by: Berek on August 13, 2007, 08:32:04 PM
Don't play that chuffing drum at me, every newspaper, tv station, radio station.
Maddies devestated parents and that feckin rabbit. There's stuff going on in the world that needs mentioning, I will happily read the paper when the two chumps are arrested!
I was applauding your post actually, I thought it was a cracker..
the rabbit will be stewed I TELL YA !! STEWED !!!
Post by: Misunderstood on August 13, 2007, 08:36:24 PM
I'm afraid I have been guilty of kinda avoiding the subject... confused:
Post by: Mr Happy on August 13, 2007, 08:40:02 PM
Don't play that chuffing drum at me, every newspaper, tv station, radio station.
Maddies devestated parents and that feckin rabbit. There's stuff going on in the world that needs mentioning, I will happily read the paper when the two chumps are arrested!
I was applauding your post actually, I thought it was a cracker..
the rabbit will be stewed I TELL YA !! STEWED !!!
I thought it was an ironic du de ching at the jokey elements. Then again I'm relly not joking, the more they speak the more I hope for the return of the kid in exchange for the parents heads!
Speaking of Cracker, have they tried him yet. In fact sod him, Columbo would sort it out with 'just waaan more qwestion' i wager that question would be 'Where've you put her body Mr and Mrs McCant?'
Post by: Mr Happy on August 13, 2007, 08:46:15 PM
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstephenconnolly.files.wordpress.com%2F2007%2F05%2Fmccann4.jpg&hash=d2193bf5ceaafc5ebf167c88387ecff7082626ba)
and this one (don't drop the kid):
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.dailymail.co.uk%2Fi%2Fpix%2F2007%2F04_03%2FmccanamelieDM0905_468x463.jpg&hash=7c41b955c897ac8cf4795660e038f99805d36735)
Or this one:
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.express.co.uk%2Fimg%2Fdynamic%2F1%2F285x214%2F6496_1.jpg&hash=8ce77147389bf147e817a1e3270066c4860385cb)
Or even this one:
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Festaticos01.cache.el-mundo.net%2Felmundo%2Fimagenes%2F2007%2F05%2F11%2F1178870221_0.jpg&hash=d55794c39e09affb71676f9d0c42419fff11fe9d)
It might actually be a hippo, the toy not the 'mother'...
Post by: Berek on August 13, 2007, 08:49:07 PM
Post by: Misunderstood on August 13, 2007, 08:58:22 PM
Aw! Shame... poor little thing. absorbing the sins of mankind >sob<
Post by: Berek on August 16, 2007, 07:38:00 AM
The blood in the apartment is not hers.. what a surprise ::)
Post by: Barman on August 16, 2007, 10:57:56 AM
Post by: TG on August 16, 2007, 10:59:18 AM
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT
The blood in the apartment is not hers.. what a surprise ::)
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91210-1280082,00.html
Post by: Barman on August 16, 2007, 11:03:47 AM
Aha! Smites for Berek then! point:IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT
The blood in the apartment is not hers.. what a surprise ::)
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91210-1280082,00.html
Post by: Berek on August 16, 2007, 11:06:42 AM
Post by: Mr Happy on August 16, 2007, 08:22:12 PM
I quite often misplace keys, loose change etc. My sofa eats them, has anybody thought to have a shufty between the cushions of the apartment sofa?
scared:
Post by: Barman on August 17, 2007, 06:06:26 AM
Everybody might be being really stupid here.One thing is for sure ? she?ll be in the last place they look! point:
I quite often misplace keys, loose change etc. My sofa eats them, has anybody thought to have a shufty between the cushions of the apartment sofa?
scared:
Post by: Berek on August 21, 2007, 02:42:40 PM
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91210-1280603,00.html
Post by: Misunderstood on August 21, 2007, 02:54:48 PM
expect some serial mourning on Merseyside.. Bigley's involved
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91210-1280603,00.html
Has anyone told Boris?
Post by: Pastis on August 21, 2007, 03:22:53 PM
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91210-1280603,00.html
That picture of Ken Bigley with his Thai bride
Post by: Berek on August 31, 2007, 10:01:55 AM
Post by: Snoopy on August 31, 2007, 10:12:51 AM
Post by: Berek on August 31, 2007, 10:15:21 AM
Post by: Uncle Mort on August 31, 2007, 10:17:26 AM
Post by: Misunderstood on August 31, 2007, 11:00:31 AM
Post by: Barman on August 31, 2007, 02:03:51 PM
Post by: TG on September 06, 2007, 11:13:32 AM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6981411.stm
Post by: Berek on September 06, 2007, 03:07:03 PM
oh yes, lets all feel sorry for her but not for the poor little thing the so called loving mother left alone
Post by: Nick on September 06, 2007, 07:33:52 PM
Post by: Berek on September 06, 2007, 08:15:59 PM
we will be kept up to date by their campaign manager ::)
Post by: TG on September 07, 2007, 07:18:52 AM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6982969.stm
Post by: GROWLER on September 07, 2007, 07:44:06 AM
Kate McCann is now a formal suspect. noooo:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6982969.stm
I can't wait to tell Mrs Growler. lol:
There WILL be an explosion, as she thinks the sun shines out of her...and his....arse, and they couldn't possibly do such a thing. ::)
Was watching this on the news last night, and I had to walk out in the end before we came to blows over this story. evil:
Post by: Bar Wench on September 07, 2007, 07:49:20 AM
Post by: GROWLER on September 07, 2007, 08:48:23 AM
Apparently, I have a dim outlook on EVERYONE and EVERTHING.
She called me a cynic! drumroll:
Correct. She knows me SO well! happy088
Post by: Barman on September 07, 2007, 09:00:43 AM
Post by: GROWLER on September 07, 2007, 09:09:28 AM
They should have just asked us in the first place? ::)
Just look at my avatart. That is me deep down inside really. cloud9:
Now come on. Tickle my tummy again. lol:
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 07, 2007, 09:50:42 AM
Post by: Snoopy on September 07, 2007, 10:19:48 AM
It seems that "me as I used to be" is nothing! lol:
Post by: Barman on September 07, 2007, 10:44:46 AM
Post by: Snoopy on September 07, 2007, 10:59:49 AM
All working here... whistle:
Well don't just stand there all smug ~ fix it!
Post by: Barman on September 07, 2007, 11:06:38 AM
Mine isn't broken... whistle:All working here... whistle:
Well don't just stand there all smug ~ fix it!
Post by: Snoopy on September 07, 2007, 11:14:39 AM
Mine isn't broken... whistle:All working here... whistle:
Well don't just stand there all smug ~ fix it!
But several of your customers do have a problem and you are the one with the virtual spanners.
Of course if you want to be difficult I'm sure the Cypriot authorities will welcome an enquiry about a certain missing person whistle:
Post by: Bar Wench on September 07, 2007, 11:16:49 AM
Mine isn't broken... whistle:All working here... whistle:
Well don't just stand there all smug ~ fix it!
But several of your customers do have a problem and you are the one with the virtual spanners.
Of course if you want to be difficult I'm sure the Cypriot authorities will welcome an enquiry about a certain missing person whistle:
Ummm, wouldn't customer imply that we, umm, you know, actually pay him? redface:
Post by: Barman on September 07, 2007, 11:17:37 AM
Eeeek! shocked003Mine isn't broken... whistle:All working here... whistle:
Well don't just stand there all smug ~ fix it!
But several of your customers do have a problem and you are the one with the virtual spanners.
Of course if you want to be difficult I'm sure the Cypriot authorities will welcome an enquiry about a certain missing person whistle:
Okay, okay... I'm sure the way to 'fix' it is to log-in using the virtual pub address - http://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/index.php and not the move-to-cyprus version whistle:
Post by: Barman on September 07, 2007, 11:18:34 AM
Fat chance of that! (https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freesmileys.org%2Femo%2Fangry017.gif&hash=f5d6be6773166b321a5161fb22fa27d459b05217) (http://www.freesmileys.org)Mine isn't broken... whistle:All working here... whistle:
Well don't just stand there all smug ~ fix it!
But several of your customers do have a problem and you are the one with the virtual spanners.
Of course if you want to be difficult I'm sure the Cypriot authorities will welcome an enquiry about a certain missing person whistle:
Ummm, wouldn't customer imply that we, umm, you know, actually pay him? redface:
Post by: Bar Wench on September 07, 2007, 11:19:10 AM
Fat chance of that! (https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freesmileys.org%2Femo%2Fangry017.gif&hash=f5d6be6773166b321a5161fb22fa27d459b05217) (http://www.freesmileys.org)Mine isn't broken... whistle:All working here... whistle:
Well don't just stand there all smug ~ fix it!
But several of your customers do have a problem and you are the one with the virtual spanners.
Of course if you want to be difficult I'm sure the Cypriot authorities will welcome an enquiry about a certain missing person whistle:
Ummm, wouldn't customer imply that we, umm, you know, actually pay him? redface:
Indeed. point:
Post by: Barman on September 07, 2007, 11:24:10 AM
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freesmileys.org%2Fsigs%2Fsigs-animal-027.gif&hash=4b383e4d6d45740ecdb4371c56d7ca58c1dcc1de) (http://www.freesmileys.org)Fat chance of that! (https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freesmileys.org%2Femo%2Fangry017.gif&hash=f5d6be6773166b321a5161fb22fa27d459b05217) (http://www.freesmileys.org)Mine isn't broken... whistle:All working here... whistle:
Well don't just stand there all smug ~ fix it!
But several of your customers do have a problem and you are the one with the virtual spanners.
Of course if you want to be difficult I'm sure the Cypriot authorities will welcome an enquiry about a certain missing person whistle:
Ummm, wouldn't customer imply that we, umm, you know, actually pay him? redface:
Indeed. point:
Post by: Bar Wench on September 07, 2007, 11:26:47 AM
Post by: TG on September 07, 2007, 11:31:17 AM
Eeeek! shocked003Mine isn't broken... whistle:All working here... whistle:
Well don't just stand there all smug ~ fix it!
But several of your customers do have a problem and you are the one with the virtual spanners.
Of course if you want to be difficult I'm sure the Cypriot authorities will welcome an enquiry about a certain missing person whistle:
Okay, okay... I'm sure the way to 'fix' it is to log-in using the virtual pub address - http://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/index.php and not the move-to-cyprus version whistle:
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload2.postimage.org%2F663939%2Fvic20_2.jpg&hash=c0656b305febce8d2602c0a77a348ecc35bf273d) (http://upload2.postimage.org/663939/photo_hosting.html)
point:
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 07, 2007, 11:34:33 AM
Okay, okay... I'm sure the way to 'fix' it is to log-in using the virtual pub address - http://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/index.php and not the move-to-cyprus version whistle:
I must have missed the "You can go back to using the original address" message rubschin:
Is everything working properly now?
Post by: Barman on September 07, 2007, 11:40:43 AM
No... noooo:Okay, okay... I'm sure the way to 'fix' it is to log-in using the virtual pub address - http://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/index.php and not the move-to-cyprus version whistle:
I must have missed the "You can go back to using the original address" message rubschin:
Is everything working properly now?
But I'm setting up the new site and will probably move everything over in a week or so... whistle:
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 07, 2007, 11:45:22 AM
Who did it and what really happened?
Post by: Barman on September 07, 2007, 11:48:51 AM
Anyway back to Maddy...Berek and I worked out on day 1 that the parents did it. whistle:
Who did it and what really happened?
Post by: The Moan Ranger on September 07, 2007, 11:49:31 AM
Post by: Barman on September 07, 2007, 11:51:12 AM
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 07, 2007, 11:57:11 AM
Post by: TG on September 07, 2007, 12:02:25 PM
They then (allegedly) got the dose wrong, kid pegs it, massive cover up, Columbo (three months later) asks just one more question, busted.
Who will play the delectable Mrs McCann in the movie I wonder?
Post by: Nick on September 07, 2007, 12:21:07 PM
Post by: Bar Wench on September 07, 2007, 12:22:27 PM
Okay, Berek, the Moan Ranger, a woman in Moan Ranger?s office and I? ::)
Ahem
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 07, 2007, 12:34:58 PM
I just heard the lunchtime news. She is a suspect. He is being questioned. Somethign about blood in their hire car..... noooo:
That'll be the car they hired over three weeks after the disappeance (?)
Post by: Nick on September 07, 2007, 12:41:24 PM
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 07, 2007, 12:44:09 PM
Who had it on the night of Maddy's disappeance?
Case solved.
Post by: Nick on September 07, 2007, 12:52:11 PM
Post by: Bar Wench on September 07, 2007, 12:54:09 PM
It's a hire car.
Who had it on the night of Maddy's disappeance?
Case solved.
They must have eliminated those people if they are even beginning to think of accusing the Mcanns for it. That's basic.
Post by: Nick on September 07, 2007, 12:55:15 PM
*delete as applicable
Post by: GROWLER on September 07, 2007, 01:03:10 PM
The sight of Mrs Growler getting on her hands and knees to apologise WILL be posted on here for you all to join in with the sheer joy and deilght that I'll derive from saying, THERE you optomistic bint...I TOLD YOU SO! point:
Personally I'd simply rather they found the little mite safe and well, but I think that train of thought has long since gone tbh.
Post by: Nick on September 07, 2007, 01:03:55 PM
Post by: GROWLER on September 07, 2007, 01:07:43 PM
It won't be long now Growler
It'll be a long time before Mrs Growler EVER gets on her hands and knees to me tbh. ::)
Post by: Nick on September 07, 2007, 01:08:24 PM
Post by: GROWLER on September 07, 2007, 01:12:21 PM
I am not sure I wish to pursue any line of enquiry about that, thank you very much eeek:
No, and I gave up many many many years ago too tbh. ;)
Always been a total and utter lost cause from day one. sad32:
Post by: GROWLER on September 07, 2007, 01:19:54 PM
Where in the car would be helpful to know. rubschin:
The boot?
Mrs McCann told the officers there was "no way" this could be the case,
Sounds a bit desperate to me, but their again, I'm just an untrusting cynical old bastard ....apparently. eeek:
Post by: Nick on September 07, 2007, 01:22:17 PM
Post by: Barman on September 07, 2007, 01:24:50 PM
Bloody hell! evil:Okay, Berek, the Moan Ranger, a woman in Moan Ranger?s office and I? ::)
Ahem
Berek, the Moan Ranger, a woman in Moan Ranger?s office, Wenchy, Growler and I? noooo:
Post by: GROWLER on September 07, 2007, 01:25:25 PM
25 days AFTER her disappearance?
Not wishing to piss on the plods chips here, but wouldn't a corpse have 'drip dried' by then, IF they were transporting her body for disposal?
I'm no expert in these matters, but the whole thing appears to be a total shambles imo.
Post by: Nick on September 07, 2007, 01:26:35 PM
Post by: GROWLER on September 07, 2007, 01:28:04 PM
Bloody hell! evil:Okay, Berek, the Moan Ranger, a woman in Moan Ranger?s office and I? ::)
Ahem
, a woman in Moan Ranger?s office,
Thought she was a witch, or does woman still count?
Evidence of broom stick and pot full of boiling frogs in the werks canteen required as evidence NOW please Moany.
Post by: GROWLER on September 07, 2007, 01:30:20 PM
Not if she was alive when they put her in the boot!
So where TF did they hide her (alive) for 25 days then, and more to the point, WHY?
Why would they report her missing if they knew she wasn't?
Something not adding up here. confused:
Post by: Nick on September 07, 2007, 01:30:55 PM
Post by: GROWLER on September 07, 2007, 01:35:32 PM
Post by: Nick on September 07, 2007, 01:37:36 PM
Post by: Barman on September 07, 2007, 01:38:35 PM
As I mentioned some time ago, why did they need to hire a car anyway?
At the time IIRC they had chauffer driven limos, private jets and the popemobile at their disposal. whistle:
Post by: GROWLER on September 07, 2007, 01:44:05 PM
So you reckon she DIDN't do it now. Make yer mind up man!
Never said that. I'm just keepin' an open cynical mind, and gathering the facts just like Columbo like.
Just need a rancid dirty beige coat, glass eye, dodgy incomprehensible accent, and the image will be complete. eeek:
Make the prime suspect feel all warm and cosy, and out of the equation, then POUNCE, BEAR style! eveilgrin:
Post by: Nick on September 07, 2007, 01:48:10 PM
So you reckon she DIDN't do it now. Make yer mind up man!
Never said that. I'm just keepin' an open cynical mind, and gathering the facts just like Columbo like.
Just need a rancid dirty beige coat, glass eye, dodgy incomprehensible accent, and the image will be complete. eeek:
Make the prime suspect feel all warm and cosy, and out of the equation, then POUNCE, BEAR style! eveilgrin:
I had been wondering that too. The father then?
Post by: The Moan Ranger on September 07, 2007, 01:48:17 PM
Post by: Snoopy on September 07, 2007, 01:50:23 PM
Why don't the Portugese police employ the services of one of those "wonderful" New Zealand psychics that seem to occupy one particular UK Channel's night time schedule. I bet, if asked, they could probably find Shergar too!
Shergar was found years ago
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.petplanet.co.uk%2Fshop_dev%2Fassets%2Fnew_product_images%2F%255Cpedigree%255Cchappie_can.jpg&hash=3aa5a677d4b77b6a1b02a76f6cde83fde68bc363)
Post by: Bar Wench on September 07, 2007, 01:50:45 PM
I don't like talking morbid dead body stuff type things, but as i said/asked before, would a corpse of 25 days deceased still bleed and / or leave traces in the car, and why, if she was still alive then, did they not keep schtum until she'd been.................... rubschin: 'got rid of in whatever manner that may have been?
Remembering that it is just a rumour, who is to say that it is blood and not say secretions from a decomposing body.
Post by: The Moan Ranger on September 07, 2007, 01:51:54 PM
Bloody hell! evil:Okay, Berek, the Moan Ranger, a woman in Moan Ranger?s office and I? ::)
Ahem
, a woman in Moan Ranger?s office,
Thought she was a witch, or does woman still count?
Evidence of broom stick and pot full of boiling frogs in the werks canteen required as evidence NOW please Moany.
She has ginger hair and drives a LR Disco. What more evidence do you need?
Post by: Nick on September 07, 2007, 01:52:48 PM
I don't like talking morbid dead body stuff type things, but as i said/asked before, would a corpse of 25 days deceased still bleed and / or leave traces in the car, and why, if she was still alive then, did they not keep schtum until she'd been.................... rubschin: 'got rid of in whatever manner that may have been?
Remembering that it is just a rumour, who is to say that it is blood and not say secretions from a decomposing body.
You an expert in this then? scared2:
Post by: Snoopy on September 07, 2007, 01:52:59 PM
Bloody hell! evil:Okay, Berek, the Moan Ranger, a woman in Moan Ranger?s office and I? ::)
Ahem
, a woman in Moan Ranger?s office,
Thought she was a witch, or does woman still count?
Evidence of broom stick and pot full of boiling frogs in the werks canteen required as evidence NOW please Moany.
She has ginger hair and drives a LR Disco. What more evidence do you need?
A familiar ~ all witches have one .... often a black cat but they take various forms.
Post by: Bar Wench on September 07, 2007, 01:53:22 PM
I don't like talking morbid dead body stuff type things, but as i said/asked before, would a corpse of 25 days deceased still bleed and / or leave traces in the car, and why, if she was still alive then, did they not keep schtum until she'd been.................... rubschin: 'got rid of in whatever manner that may have been?
Remembering that it is just a rumour, who is to say that it is blood and not say secretions from a decomposing body.
You an expert in this then? scared2:
No, I just watch a lot of tv. redface:
Post by: Nick on September 07, 2007, 01:53:57 PM
Post by: GROWLER on September 07, 2007, 01:54:51 PM
Bloody hell! evil:Okay, Berek, the Moan Ranger, a woman in Moan Ranger?s office and I? ::)
Ahem
, a woman in Moan Ranger?s office,
Thought she was a witch, or does woman still count?
Evidence of broom stick and pot full of boiling frogs in the werks canteen required as evidence NOW please Moany.
She has ginger hair and drives a LR Disco. What more evidence do you need?
I drive a LR Disco too sometimes, but me hair is sort of pale brown blondie mousy type colour.
However, I am married to Mrs Growler, so that woiuld explain the LR Disco bit. whistle:
Post by: Bar Wench on September 07, 2007, 01:55:11 PM
Post by: Nick on September 07, 2007, 01:56:00 PM
Post by: Snoopy on September 07, 2007, 01:56:35 PM
Post by: Barman on September 07, 2007, 01:56:49 PM
Having said that. Dead bodies probably wouldn't bleed as bleeding is caused by blood pressure which is caused by a beating heart. Dead bodies don't tend to have beating hearts.We got some steaks out of the freezer the other day ? I?m sure they?d been dead for weeks.
Blood everywhere. noooo:
Post by: The Moan Ranger on September 07, 2007, 01:57:24 PM
"Corpses START bleeding after 25 days. Especially in a warm climate." rubschin:
I believe some of you may know of this particulat combatant from somewhere else.
Post by: Nick on September 07, 2007, 01:57:38 PM
Post by: Nick on September 07, 2007, 01:58:09 PM
According to a well known Wallington intellectual (his words, not mine...)...
"Corpses START bleeding after 25 days. Especially in a warm climate." rubschin:
I believe some of you may know of this particulat combatant from somewhere else.
No. Remind us!
Post by: Barman on September 07, 2007, 01:59:15 PM
Post by: Snoopy on September 07, 2007, 02:00:00 PM
Having said that. Dead bodies probably wouldn't bleed as bleeding is caused by blood pressure which is caused by a beating heart. Dead bodies don't tend to have beating hearts.We got some steaks out of the freezer the other day ? I?m sure they?d been dead for weeks.
Blood everywhere. noooo:
A slightly different situation I feel. ::)
Post by: Nick on September 07, 2007, 02:00:21 PM
Post by: Barman on September 07, 2007, 02:00:52 PM
Little Maddy could have been in a freezer!Having said that. Dead bodies probably wouldn't bleed as bleeding is caused by blood pressure which is caused by a beating heart. Dead bodies don't tend to have beating hearts.We got some steaks out of the freezer the other day ? I?m sure they?d been dead for weeks.
Blood everywhere. noooo:
A slightly different situation I feel. ::)
Post by: Nick on September 07, 2007, 02:01:09 PM
Post by: Barman on September 07, 2007, 02:01:47 PM
Beat you to it!Bugger!
But I'm further away! evil:
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 07, 2007, 02:02:44 PM
Little Maddy could have been in a freezer!
Which they just happened to have with them on holiday.
Post by: Snoopy on September 07, 2007, 02:03:25 PM
"Och Aye! I'd like tae rent some space in yer freezer for a couple or three weeks my Portugese man"
Nah it doesn't work.
Post by: Barman on September 07, 2007, 02:04:03 PM
We used to take one of those cold boxes with us when we went away... and those blue things you put in them. whistle:Little Maddy could have been in a freezer!
Which they just happened to have with them on holiday.
Post by: Nick on September 07, 2007, 02:05:03 PM
We used to take one of those cold boxes with us when we went away... and those blue things you put in them. whistle:Little Maddy could have been in a freezer!
Which they just happened to have with them on holiday.
And how is Landlady? Past her sell by date yet?
Post by: Nick on September 07, 2007, 02:06:08 PM
Little Maddy could have been in a freezer!
Which they just happened to have with them on holiday.
It is possible. You should see Mrs Nick's suitcases. Oh, is this a serious thread?
Post by: Barman on September 07, 2007, 02:06:36 PM
Give it another 25 days or so... whistle:We used to take one of those cold boxes with us when we went away... and those blue things you put in them. whistle:Little Maddy could have been in a freezer!
Which they just happened to have with them on holiday.
And how is Landlady? Past her sell by date yet?
Post by: The Moan Ranger on September 07, 2007, 02:07:32 PM
'Combatant' rubschin:
A mad relic from the "other side". Named after a proprietary brand of tobacco. I don't think he likes me too much as he went to Wallington Boys, whereas I went to the better school two miles away. He has also been known to drive a Skoda.
P.S. I believe that Kate will also be charged with the murder of Steve Fossett.
Post by: Nick on September 07, 2007, 02:08:13 PM
Post by: Nick on September 07, 2007, 02:09:19 PM
'Combatant' rubschin:
A mad relic from the "other side". Named after a proprietary brand of tobacco. I don't think he likes me too much as he went to Wallington Boys, whereas I went to the better school two miles away. He has also been known to drive a Skoda.
P.S. I believe that Kate will also be charged with the murder of Steve Fossett.
Oh him. Where is Steve Fossett anyway. I miss him
Post by: Barman on September 07, 2007, 02:09:40 PM
rubschin: Golden Virginia?'Combatant' rubschin:
A mad relic from the "other side". Named after a proprietary brand of tobacco. I don't think he likes me too much as he went to Wallington Boys, whereas I went to the better school two miles away. He has also been known to drive a Skoda.
P.S. I believe that Kate will also be charged with the murder of Steve Fossett.
Post by: Nick on September 07, 2007, 02:10:40 PM
Now. What is this thread about?
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 07, 2007, 02:12:02 PM
Don't talk about my sister like that.
Now. What is this thread about?
Speculating wildly I'd say wild speculation.
Post by: Nick on September 07, 2007, 02:12:56 PM
[attachment deleted by admin]
Post by: Pastis on September 07, 2007, 02:50:01 PM
We should get her on the case.
Not as impressive in the err flesh redface:
IMHO of course
Post by: Pastis on September 07, 2007, 02:52:53 PM
Post by: GROWLER on September 07, 2007, 05:40:21 PM
Don't talk about my sister like that.
Now. What is this thread about?
Speculating wildly I'd say wild speculation.
Is right. We are simply gathering the evidence...well trying to amongst all this random shite that some ar intent on discussing....before we come to a firm decision as to who did what and when.
The plot is thickening faster than my lumpy gravy. rubschin:
Post by: TG on September 07, 2007, 06:26:34 PM
Don't talk about my sister like that.
Now. What is this thread about?
Speculating wildly I'd say wild speculation.
Is right. We are simply gathering the evidence...well trying to amongst all this random shite that some ar intent on discussing....before we come to a firm decision as to who did what and when.
The plot is thickening faster than my lumpy gravy. rubschin:
Thickening indeed. Accorrding to Sky Mrs McCann was offered a deal of 2 years in chokey if she confessed. noooo:
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-1283269,00.html?f=dta
Post by: TG on September 07, 2007, 06:44:31 PM
They are now quoting family statements about planted evidence and things being 'untoward' about the investigation.
I have no idea what the fuck is going on over there but I have no doubt that even though we slag our police off, if this had happened over here there would have been arrests by now.
Post by: Berek on September 07, 2007, 06:59:28 PM
oh, and I'm going to claim I put ?100 in a collection tin for the " fund ".. I now want it back !!!
just want to also point out that me and the barman sussed them on day one.
Post by: TG on September 07, 2007, 07:10:09 PM
No matter how many people you ask, you will find no one who made a donation to the fund, wore a yellow ribbon etc.
I for one will write a harsh Letter to the Leicester Mercury (my local rag) asking them who paid for the thousands of wristbands they gave away.
Post by: Berek on September 07, 2007, 07:23:07 PM
Post by: Mr Happy on September 07, 2007, 07:43:43 PM
As for the blood in the car, if she'd blead profusely it would have been all over the clothes and/or whatever she was placed in.
I didn't say it was murder, i'm still of the belief that they'd left her unsupervised at some point, she drank bleach / took mothers hrt tablets / took fathers smack / fell off bed etc. On their return parents saw that they were likely to lose their other kids thus embarked on an ill advised lie fest.
And you Berek should be ashamed, for a refund visit:
www.ifundedthemccanseuroadventureinwhichtheyvemadeamillionandnowweknowtheyvedoneitiwantarefund.com (http://www.ifundedthemccanseuroadventureinwhichtheyvemadeamillionandnowweknowtheyvedoneitiwantarefund.com)
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 07, 2007, 08:06:36 PM
Post by: GROWLER on September 07, 2007, 08:40:24 PM
Oi, if you don't mind i win the most cynical bastard prize - i said it was her before she did it!
As for the blood in the car, if she'd blead profusely it would have been all over the clothes and/or whatever she was placed in.
I didn't say it was murder, i'm still of the belief that they'd left her unsupervised at some point, she drank bleach / took mothers hrt tablets / took fathers smack / fell off bed etc. On their return parents saw that they were likely to lose their other kids thus embarked on an ill advised lie fest.
And you Berek should be ashamed, for a refund visit:
www.ifundedthemccanseuroadventureinwhichtheyvemadeamillionandnowweknowtheyvedoneitiwantarefund.com (http://www.ifundedthemccanseuroadventureinwhichtheyvemadeamillionandnowweknowtheyvedoneitiwantarefund.com)
Error 500 (Internal Server Error) 'www.ifundedthemccanseuroadventureinwhichtheyvemadeamillionandnowweknowtheyvedoneitiwantarefund.com' could not be found.
sad32:
Post by: Darwins Selection on September 07, 2007, 11:48:11 PM
All this speculation is all very well but the obvious problem is that if the parent(s) are to blame where's the body? I just cannot see where they could have hidden Maddy's body in the short time they had. It would have been found.Pavarotti ate it.
Post by: Barman on September 08, 2007, 06:01:38 AM
I see Jeremy fucking Thompson is out there, I bet he's been wanking himself silly over it.Ahem... from page 7... whistle:
oh, and I'm going to claim I put ?100 in a collection tin for the " fund ".. I now want it back !!!
just want to also point out that me and the barman sussed them on day one.
Quote from: Barman
Berek and I worked out on day 1 that the parents did it.
Post by: Berek on September 08, 2007, 08:34:00 AM
I see Jeremy fucking Thompson is out there, I bet he's been wanking himself silly over it.Ahem... from page 7... whistle:
oh, and I'm going to claim I put ?100 in a collection tin for the " fund ".. I now want it back !!!
just want to also point out that me and the barman sussed them on day one.Quote from: BarmanBerek and I worked out on day 1 that the parents did it.
I couldnt be arsed to read all the posts whistle:
Post by: Nick on September 08, 2007, 10:07:52 AM
Post by: GROWLER on September 08, 2007, 11:11:20 AM
Even Mrs Nick is getting suspicious now. She grabbed the paper off me this morning to "read all about it" and is now loudly speculating about whre they hid the body for a month.
Mrs Growler is as defiant as ever. I wouldn't be at all suprised to see her wearing yellow ribbons and banners draped from the widows later. ::)
She insists that they COULDN'T possibly have done what is speculatively being claimed. ::)
She stumped off in huff stating she no longer wanted to discuss the matter, and muttering something about me being an evil minded cynic.
FFS. ::)
Post by: Snoopy on September 08, 2007, 11:14:20 AM
Post by: GROWLER on September 08, 2007, 11:27:52 AM
Either way there is the potential for a lot of red faces ~ both on this forum and elsewhere. whistle:
Sun out over your neck of the woods then Snoops'? eeek:
I'm not accusing anyone of anything, but my suspicions are fimly on the parents.
I do worry about the slight possibility of the Portugese plod 'planting this alledged blood find' in the boot of the hired Scenic. They are obviously desperate to draw a close on this case with all the critisism they've been receiving, and this could possibly be a good get out clause for them.
That then raises another question though. rubschin:
IF they did 'plant' it, where did they obtain it from, or even p'raps, did it ever exist? eeek:
The whole story is very very sad in terms of the loss of what appears to be a very pleasant little girl, but also very intriguing with twists and turns.
WTF is Miss Marples when we need her?
Post by: Berek on September 08, 2007, 12:37:32 PM
Post by: Mr Happy on September 08, 2007, 11:42:49 PM
WTF?
How long for fraud, wasting police time, and making all those sympathy forums looking like a sad bunch of arseholes?
Post by: Berek on September 09, 2007, 11:17:18 AM
Post by: GROWLER on September 09, 2007, 08:35:59 PM
I found it odd that they suddenly decided that the time was now right to scuttle back to the UK, or am I simply being my usual cynical self?
Can they be deported back to Portugal if the plod/courts want to charge them, or will they now have imunity and can opt out of going back?
I believe the plod are waiting for the final DNA tests from the holiday flat to reach them this week from the UK before deciding if charges are to brought against them or not.
Post by: Barman on September 10, 2007, 05:53:51 AM
FFS, they?ve been out in Portugal for four months! Not only that, they?ve been jetting off all over the place leaving the twins in the care of relatives. If you wanted normality for the twins they would have come back months ago.
I think it is a cynical move to get them away from the investigation there and hope that extradition will prove difficult ?because of the publicity? if the Portuguese plod want them back? whistle:
Post by: Bar Wench on September 10, 2007, 07:52:04 AM
I'm interested in knowing why parents suspected of murdering their child haven't had their remaining kids taken into care.
Post by: Barman on September 10, 2007, 07:56:18 AM
Their agurido status means that the portugese police can choose to call them back as and when they wish.Theoretically so, yet it will be much more complex from the UK if they choose not to go.
I'm interested in knowing why parents suspected of murdering their child haven't had their remaining kids taken into care.Agree entirely...
Post by: Bar Wench on September 10, 2007, 07:57:36 AM
Their agurido status means that the portugese police can choose to call them back as and when they wish.Theoretically so, yet it will be much more complex from the UK if they choose not to go.
But they are co-operating fully don't you know! ::) Not answering 14 questions is after all full co-operation. ::)
Post by: Snoopy on September 10, 2007, 07:58:54 AM
Post by: Bar Wench on September 10, 2007, 08:06:07 AM
I feel for the child but frankly I am getting fed up with the whole matter.
As am I. I can't believe how much of the news this is taking up!
Post by: Berek on September 11, 2007, 10:13:04 AM
I'm interested in knowing why parents suspected of murdering their child haven't had their remaining kids taken into care.
Social Services are now going to look at the case
Post by: Marley's Ghost (Imbiber of Spirits) on September 11, 2007, 10:14:16 AM
I'm interested in knowing why parents suspected of murdering their child haven't had their remaining kids taken into care.
Social Services are now going to look at the case
At last . . . . . . .
Post by: Nick on September 11, 2007, 10:25:53 AM
1. Get very busy with files and notes cos they know the media are interested and make life hell
2. Go all fluffy, mumsy and intrusive and make life hell
Post by: The Moan Ranger on September 11, 2007, 10:40:14 AM
Is it just me, or is that a very strange thing to say. Why not just say "she didn't do it"? rubschin:
Post by: Nick on September 11, 2007, 10:41:20 AM
Post by: Snoopy on September 11, 2007, 10:42:04 AM
That is weird. But then, he is Scottish. Perhaps it's normal there shrugs:
He is also a Doctor ~ makes him twice weird IMHO
Post by: Nick on September 11, 2007, 10:42:43 AM
See also: Crippin
Post by: Marley's Ghost (Imbiber of Spirits) on September 11, 2007, 11:37:12 AM
Shipman!
See also: Crippin
I think you'll find that's Crippen Nick. I expect better of you.
Post by: Nick on September 11, 2007, 11:37:50 AM
Post by: Snoopy on September 11, 2007, 11:42:44 AM
Shipman!
See also: Crippin
I think you'll find that's Crippen Nick. I expect better of you.
Blessed are those who expecteth nothing for they shall not be disappointed.
Post by: Nick on September 11, 2007, 11:44:30 AM
Post by: Marley's Ghost (Imbiber of Spirits) on September 11, 2007, 11:44:41 AM
Shipman!
See also: Crippin
I think you'll find that's Crippen Nick. I expect better of you.
Blessed are those who expecteth nothing for they shall not be disappointed.
Amen brother - praise the Lord!
Another little homily which I quite like:
The sweetness of cheapness is not enough to ally the bitterness of disappointment
There, pick the bones out of that!
Post by: Snoopy on September 11, 2007, 11:47:58 AM
Shipman!
See also: Crippin
I think you'll find that's Crippen Nick. I expect better of you.
Blessed are those who expecteth nothing for they shall not be disappointed.
Amen brother - praise the Lord!
Another little homily which I quite like:
The sweetness of cheapness is not enough to ally the bitterness of disappointment
There, pick the bones out of that!
Well ~ if you insist ~ I think you'll find the word is allay. whistle:
Post by: Misunderstood on September 11, 2007, 11:48:30 AM
The one vital thing missing (in my view) is the lack of any creditable motive - by anyone at all.
The first speculative theory of an opportunistic abduction seems to have lost ground to the extraordinary man Er... childhunt that has been ongoing for some four months - surely that would have tested the nerve of any but the most determined abductor, unless Maddie had already been killed, short of an accident or wild sex attack why would anyone want to abduct and kill her in a strange place?
Kidnapping must also be discounted by virtue of no ransom demands - unless all the publicity frightened them enough to kill her and move on.
Accidental or otherwise homicide doesn't really ring true either seeing as they are doctors, Shipman certainly knew how to cover up murders so I'm sure the McCann's would have the same skills. Even so what was the motive? And why there? It is so much easier to lose kids in crowded places. Sedation to keep them quiet maybe? again, they are doctors if they don't know how to administer a sedative then god help all the rest of us.
Maybe they really hated Maddie. Perhaps she got on their nerves to the point of killing her but... Wouldn't they have disposed of the body before raising the hue and cry and not risk hiding a body for three weeks while everyone in the world is looking for her, the DNA in the car defies logic or was an staggering risk taken in desperation. Why? people had all but stopped searching the near area by then.
There is an angle that no-one seems to have thought of yet, and that would be a personal vendetta by someone with a grudge manufacturing a scenario that must keep them twisting on the horns if not ultimately convicting them.
There are people evil enough to want that kind of revenge for something, and a Doctor and a Surgeon must have quite a few deaths through their hands. There was the "They've taken her." cry after all.
I believe there is quite a bit of milage left in this saga.
Post by: Snoopy on September 11, 2007, 11:55:51 AM
All is speculation and that includes most of the reported "Police are saying".
IMHO we would be best to turn our minds to matters we can resolve or alternatively resort once more to our usual silliness, which is at least a refuge from a horrid reality.
Post by: Nick on September 11, 2007, 12:05:57 PM
What is this thread about?
Oh yes, Landlady.
Post by: Barman on September 11, 2007, 01:10:58 PM
Yup. Boy fine at school with Mrs LEA eyes: all morning.doh:
What is this thread about?
Oh yes, Landlady.
Post by: Bar Wench on September 11, 2007, 01:37:07 PM
Post by: Nick on September 11, 2007, 01:38:51 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFCofKfWfSs (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFCofKfWfSs)
Post by: Bar Wench on September 11, 2007, 01:44:05 PM
Post by: Nick on September 11, 2007, 01:44:40 PM
Post by: Barman on September 11, 2007, 01:48:24 PM
So? Story of my life!Stop posting foreign stuff Nick! cussing:
Post by: Bar Wench on September 11, 2007, 01:49:35 PM
So? Story of my life!
Je suis dans ecole et je ne trouvez pas de temps pour regarder votre crap.
(can't remember the french for work or crap.)
Post by: The Moan Ranger on September 11, 2007, 01:52:55 PM
So? Story of my life!
Je suis dans ecole et je ne trouvez pas de temps pour regarder votre crap.
(can't remember the french for work or crap.)
But you are a woman. Men can always find the time - even for your crap. I just did point:
Post by: Snoopy on September 11, 2007, 01:54:57 PM
So? Story of my life!
Je suis dans ecole et je ne trouvez pas de temps pour regarder votre crap.
(can't remember the french for work or crap.)
Try using Merde for both ~ the French do.
Post by: Bar Wench on September 11, 2007, 01:55:46 PM
Post by: Barman on September 11, 2007, 01:56:57 PM
Post by: Snoopy on September 11, 2007, 01:58:55 PM
Merde a tous!
Exactement
Post by: Barman on September 11, 2007, 02:01:00 PM
Excrement noooo:Merde a tous!
Exactement
Post by: Misunderstood on September 11, 2007, 02:02:28 PM
Post by: Bar Wench on September 11, 2007, 02:02:35 PM
Excrement noooo:Merde a tous!
Exactement
Cuantos anos tienes? Tres? eeek:
Post by: Snoopy on September 11, 2007, 02:03:57 PM
Excrement noooo:Merde a tous!
Exactement
I think you may mean: Excr?ment
Subtle difference I appreciate but important none the less
Post by: Barman on September 11, 2007, 02:05:55 PM
Oxi noooo:Excrement noooo:Merde a tous!
Exactement
Cuantos anos tienes? Tres? eeek:
Post by: Bar Wench on September 11, 2007, 02:06:55 PM
Oxi noooo:Excrement noooo:Merde a tous!
Exactement
Cuantos anos tienes? Tres? eeek:
Avec cette numero de anx je expect better de toi. noooo:
Post by: Barman on September 11, 2007, 02:08:38 PM
anx? rubschin:Oxi noooo:Excrement noooo:Merde a tous!
Exactement
Cuantos anos tienes? Tres? eeek:
Avec cette numero de anx je expect better de toi. noooo:
Post by: Snoopy on September 11, 2007, 02:10:04 PM
Post by: Misunderstood on September 11, 2007, 02:12:24 PM
This is turning into a lesson in "Cod French" ::)
Que poisson?
Post by: Snoopy on September 11, 2007, 02:14:03 PM
This is turning into a lesson in "Cod French" ::)
Que poisson?
More or less ~ Yes
Post by: Barman on September 11, 2007, 02:14:52 PM
Post by: Barman on September 11, 2007, 02:15:53 PM
Post by: The Moan Ranger on September 11, 2007, 02:17:37 PM
Post by: Bar Wench on September 11, 2007, 02:17:48 PM
Post by: Barman on September 11, 2007, 02:18:35 PM
Wir gehen weg vom thema hier!Ja! cussing:
Post by: Snoopy on September 11, 2007, 02:18:46 PM
Vraiment, Maddy pauvre se situe probablement dans une tombe peu profonde quelque part et tout que vous pouvez parler est poisson ! cussing:
Really, poor Maddy is probably located in a tomb not very deep some share and very that you can speak is fish ::)
P'raps you mean
Maddy vraiment pauvre a ?t? vid? dans un tombeau, sous la mer, pr?s des poissons
Post by: Barman on September 11, 2007, 02:19:13 PM
It's cheating to use an online translator!Yes, MR, stop using an on-line translator! whistle:
Post by: Bar Wench on September 11, 2007, 02:19:45 PM
It's cheating to use an online translator!Yes, MR, stop using an on-line translator! whistle:
evil:
Post by: Barman on September 11, 2007, 02:21:05 PM
Oui, ce qu'il a dit ! whistle:Vraiment, Maddy pauvre se situe probablement dans une tombe peu profonde quelque part et tout que vous pouvez parler est poisson ! cussing:
Really, poor Maddy is probably located in a tomb not very deep some share and very that you can speak is fish ::)
P'raps you mean
Maddy vraiment pauvre a ?t? vid? dans un tombeau, sous la mer, pr?s des poissons
Post by: The Moan Ranger on September 11, 2007, 02:23:56 PM
Post by: Barman on September 11, 2007, 02:25:46 PM
I will have you know that I gained a B in German "O" level (note to youngsters:- this was a proper exam and not some tick box joke like the current GCSEs) and it comes in most handy when being pulled over by the German Plod for doing silly speeds (albeit on an Autobahn) on the Gixxer. So there.There Wenchy! You've upset a valued poster now! noooo:
Post by: Snoopy on September 11, 2007, 02:32:00 PM
I will have you know that I gained a B in German "O" level (note to youngsters:- this was a proper exam and not some tick box joke like the current GCSEs) and it comes in most handy when being pulled over by the German Plod for doing silly speeds (albeit on an Autobahn) on the Gixxer. So there.There Wenchy! You've upset a valued poster now! noooo:
As the Pub Hound should I bite her bum as a punishment?
Post by: Barman on September 11, 2007, 02:33:04 PM
Oh yes... whistle:I will have you know that I gained a B in German "O" level (note to youngsters:- this was a proper exam and not some tick box joke like the current GCSEs) and it comes in most handy when being pulled over by the German Plod for doing silly speeds (albeit on an Autobahn) on the Gixxer. So there.There Wenchy! You've upset a valued poster now! noooo:
As the Pub Hound should I bite her bum as a punishment?
Post by: tel on September 11, 2007, 02:35:10 PM
Post by: The Moan Ranger on September 11, 2007, 02:35:53 PM
Post by: Barman on September 11, 2007, 02:36:15 PM
I'm not sure a Beagle's mouth is big enough... tunble:eeek:
Post by: Bar Wench on September 11, 2007, 02:37:03 PM
Post by: Barman on September 11, 2007, 02:37:45 PM
I am shocked and horrified by so many posters! eeek:Go and have a lie down dear... happy100
Post by: tel on September 11, 2007, 02:38:02 PM
Post by: Bar Wench on September 11, 2007, 02:39:09 PM
I am shocked and horrified by so many posters! eeek:Go and have a lie down dear... happy100
Don't patronise me!
Post by: Barman on September 11, 2007, 02:40:30 PM
Je ne patronise pas or something... whistle:I am shocked and horrified by so many posters! eeek:Go and have a lie down dear... happy100
Don't patronise me!
Post by: Bar Wench on September 11, 2007, 02:41:17 PM
Je ne patronise pas or something... whistle:I am shocked and horrified by so many posters! eeek:Go and have a lie down dear... happy100
Don't patronise me!
Hmmmm. That's what Mr Wench says and then he follows it up with a pat on the hand or a kiss on the forehead. evil:
Post by: Barman on September 11, 2007, 02:42:11 PM
Would you settle for a bite on the bum? whistle:Je ne patronise pas or something... whistle:I am shocked and horrified by so many posters! eeek:Go and have a lie down dear... happy100
Don't patronise me!
Hmmmm. That's what Mr Wench says and then he follows it up with a pat on the hand or a kiss on the forehead. evil:
Post by: Bar Wench on September 11, 2007, 02:42:37 PM
Would you settle for a bite on the bum? whistle:Je ne patronise pas or something... whistle:I am shocked and horrified by so many posters! eeek:Go and have a lie down dear... happy100
Don't patronise me!
Hmmmm. That's what Mr Wench says and then he follows it up with a pat on the hand or a kiss on the forehead. evil:
cussing:
Post by: The Moan Ranger on September 11, 2007, 02:43:52 PM
Post by: Barman on September 11, 2007, 02:44:52 PM
That'll be 'no' then? Sorry Snoopy, I tried... noooo:Would you settle for a bite on the bum? whistle:Je ne patronise pas or something... whistle:I am shocked and horrified by so many posters! eeek:Go and have a lie down dear... happy100
Don't patronise me!
Hmmmm. That's what Mr Wench says and then he follows it up with a pat on the hand or a kiss on the forehead. evil:
cussing:
Post by: Bar Wench on September 11, 2007, 02:51:06 PM
Just turn the other cheek Wenchy...and try not to block out the sun as you do tunble:
sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32:
Post by: tel on September 11, 2007, 02:54:03 PM
Do you slobber, Mr Wench only dribbles.I will have you know that I gained a B in German "O" level (note to youngsters:- this was a proper exam and not some tick box joke like the current GCSEs) and it comes in most handy when being pulled over by the German Plod for doing silly speeds (albeit on an Autobahn) on the Gixxer. So there.There Wenchy! You've upset a valued poster now! noooo:
As the Pub Hound should I bite her bum as a punishment?
Post by: Snoopy on September 11, 2007, 02:57:29 PM
Just turn the other cheek Wenchy...and try not to block out the sun as you do tunble:
sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32:
Avons-nous les constructeurs dedans ?
Post by: Barman on September 11, 2007, 02:58:36 PM
BangheadJust turn the other cheek Wenchy...and try not to block out the sun as you do tunble:
sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32: sad24: sad32:
Avons-nous les constructeurs dedans ?
Post by: Bar Wench on September 11, 2007, 02:58:53 PM
Post by: Snoopy on September 11, 2007, 02:59:50 PM
Post by: Bar Wench on September 11, 2007, 03:02:27 PM
I said "Have you got the builders in?"
No! cussing:
rubschin: Actually, not sure. eeek:
Post by: Snoopy on September 11, 2007, 03:04:10 PM
I said "Have you got the builders in?"
No! cussing:
Just wondered ~ you seem a bit touchy and tearful ..... next week probably then. whistle:
Post by: Bar Wench on September 11, 2007, 03:13:38 PM
I said "Have you got the builders in?"
No! cussing:
Just wondered ~ you seem a bit touchy and tearful ..... next week probably then. whistle:
Maybe who knows.
Post by: Nick on September 11, 2007, 03:45:11 PM
What is this thread about?
Post by: TG on September 11, 2007, 04:07:09 PM
What is this thread about?
I dunno. Some kid I think.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91210-1283521,00.html
tunble:
Post by: Barman on September 11, 2007, 04:14:16 PM
Que?PMT doh:
What is this thread about?
Post by: Misunderstood on September 11, 2007, 04:17:05 PM
Vraiment, Maddy pauvre se situe probablement dans une tombe peu profonde quelque part et tout que vous pouvez parler est poisson ! cussing:
Really, poor Maddy is probably located in a tomb not very deep some share and very that you can speak is fish ::)
P'raps you mean
Maddy vraiment pauvre a ?t? vid? dans un tombeau, sous la mer, pr?s des poissons
What? 'Really poor Maddy was emptied in a tomb, under the sea, close to fish' ???
I think you mean... "Wat slechte Maddie heeft gekregen om met de prijs van vissen te doen?"
Post by: Barman on September 11, 2007, 04:20:39 PM
What is this thread about?
I dunno. Some kid I think.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91210-1283521,00.html
tunble:
Quote
Bodily fluids - not blood - matching Madeleine McCann's DNA have been found in the car hired by her parents, according to sources.Smoking gun?
The McCanns: Enduring a tense waitThe sample was taken from the boot, where the spare tyre is kept.
It had an 88% match with the missing four-year-old's DNA, sources said.
Police searching the car also found so much of Madeleine's hair that it could not have been transferred from a blanket or clothes.
Post by: Misunderstood on September 11, 2007, 04:26:30 PM
Post by: TG on September 11, 2007, 04:29:07 PM
Oh No! Not ANOTHER Browning HiPower! eeek:
Not the weapon of choice for the modern medical professional.
Post by: Snoopy on September 11, 2007, 04:30:38 PM
Post by: Barman on September 11, 2007, 04:36:51 PM
Post by: GROWLER on September 11, 2007, 04:59:19 PM
Que?
What is this thread about?
YEA! WTF is all this bloody shite? evil:
With the latest news from Potugal, I was expecting some sensible reasoned views on this torrid subject.
But what do i 'read'? 5 pages of dribblin' drivel.
For goodness sake
Post by: Snoopy on September 11, 2007, 05:37:28 PM
No child and no body ~ so what's to say?
We have no factual news coming out of Portugal. In fact very little news other than the stories "attributed" to unnamed "police" sources.
The only official statement issued by the police is that they have NO direct DNA evidence relating to Maddy and have now handed their files to the prosecutor for a decision. Under Portuguese law the "Prosecutor" will either tell the Police to arrest and charge someone, to seek further evidence, take more statements etc, send the file "upstairs" to a Judge for his/her opinion or to close the investigation. The Prosecutor has today sent the file to a Judge who has ten days to come to a decision.
No-one other than the Police and the Prosecutor knows what is in the files, the Judge has yet to read them. Anything and everything else is speculation.
The Press and other media are simply muck raking and frankly know nothing more than we do.
We have spent 4 months and 19 pages of debate and achieved absolute nothing of any real value. In fact our only conclusion is that we have no conclusion.
Personally, whilst I am sorry for the child, I have no idea what has happened to her, I cannot explain the actions of her parents either when the child was "taken" or since (but I can say I would not have behaved the way they did on the night she vanished).
What is left to debate/discuss?
So we moved onto our usual trick of talking drivel, cracking jokes and generally lightening the mood.
Because there is nothing else we can do.
Post by: TG on September 11, 2007, 05:47:37 PM
surrender:
Post by: Berek on September 11, 2007, 06:46:09 PM
Post by: Snoopy on September 11, 2007, 06:50:49 PM
latest news is that the prosecutor has deemed there to be enough evidence to charge so he has passed the file on to the judge, who will decide within 10 days
Thank you for that reprise of what I said two posts previously. confused:
I Know ~ you can't be arsed to read all that. ::)
Post by: Pastis on September 11, 2007, 07:00:19 PM
Cop this! (http://www.pugbus.net/artman/publish/09077002_11_mccannquiz.shtml)
Post by: Snoopy on September 11, 2007, 07:02:15 PM
You think we're making light of it ??
Cop this! (http://www.pugbus.net/artman/publish/09077002_11_mccannquiz.shtml)
For my part I am trying hard to ignore it until further information and better facts come to light.
Post by: Pastis on September 11, 2007, 07:12:26 PM
By comparison we're showing a measure of restraint... both ways confused:
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 11, 2007, 07:37:41 PM
Post by: Nick on September 11, 2007, 07:40:02 PM
Post by: GROWLER on September 11, 2007, 07:44:44 PM
I just cannot understand that if the parent(s) did kill Maddie then where was the body for the three weeks? And if it was hidden so well that it wasn't found why not leave it there instead of hiring a car and moving it?
That's a very good point.
I have my doubts about this DNA sample they alledgedly found in the hire car.
Was it really there, or have they simply shifted something from the villa they found into the car?
Would the Portugese plod really do that though? eeek:
I know we can't solve the case, but I find the mystery side of all this very intriguing.
Post by: Nick on September 11, 2007, 07:46:20 PM
[attachment deleted by admin]
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 11, 2007, 07:57:42 PM
Post by: Mr Happy on September 11, 2007, 11:17:18 PM
At the risk of repeating myself:
No child and no body ~ so what's to say?
Quite a lot it seems, see below:
We have no factual news coming out of Portugal. In fact very little news other than the stories "attributed" to unnamed "police" sources.
The only official statement issued by the police is that they have NO direct DNA evidence relating to Maddy and have now handed their files to the prosecutor for a decision. Under Portuguese law the "Prosecutor" will either tell the Police to arrest and charge someone, to seek further evidence, take more statements etc, send the file "upstairs" to a Judge for his/her opinion or to close the investigation. The Prosecutor has today sent the file to a Judge who has ten days to come to a decision.
No-one other than the Police and the Prosecutor knows what is in the files, the Judge has yet to read them. Anything and everything else is speculation.
The Press and other media are simply muck raking and frankly know nothing more than we do.
Personally, whilst I am sorry for the child, I have no idea what has happened to her, I cannot explain the actions of her parents either when the child was "taken" or since (but I can say I would not have behaved the way they did on the night she vanished).
What is left to debate/discuss?
So we moved onto our usual trick of talking drivel, cracking jokes and generally lightening the mood.
Because there is nothing else we can do.
We have spent 4 months and 19 pages of debate and achieved absolute nothing of any real value. In fact our only conclusion is that we have no conclusion.
I've learned to parlez vous francais pigeon style!
Post by: Snoopy on September 12, 2007, 09:03:15 AM
Je prends le grand plaisir en ?largissant vos horizons.
whistle:
Post by: Misunderstood on September 12, 2007, 09:32:32 AM
You think we're making light of it ??
Cop this! (http://www.pugbus.net/artman/publish/09077002_11_mccannquiz.shtml)
For my part I am trying hard to ignore it until further information and better facts come to light.
Aw quit being so stuffy... A bit of healthy speculation keeps the interest levels up.
Otherwise four months of damn hard work by the McCann's just goes to waste. You wouldn't want people saying "Maddie? - Who?" now would you? ;)
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 12, 2007, 09:35:27 AM
Post by: Nick on September 12, 2007, 09:36:47 AM
Post by: Snoopy on September 12, 2007, 09:36:54 AM
You think we're making light of it ??
Cop this! (http://www.pugbus.net/artman/publish/09077002_11_mccannquiz.shtml)
For my part I am trying hard to ignore it until further information and better facts come to light.
Aw quit being so stuffy... A bit of healthy speculation keeps the interest levels up.
Otherwise four months of damn hard work by the McCann's just goes to waste. You wouldn't want people saying "Maddie? - Who?" now would you? ;)
Stuffy! Moi?
You come in here and call me Stuffy when you don't even fit on top of the kennel.
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.angelfire.com%2Fspace2%2Fjeffrey2500%2FPictures%2FGarfied_Snoopy.gif&hash=dd4053993cf05a2f22749f176a38017373555a04)
Post by: Misunderstood on September 12, 2007, 09:39:50 AM
You think we're making light of it ??
Cop this! (http://www.pugbus.net/artman/publish/09077002_11_mccannquiz.shtml)
For my part I am trying hard to ignore it until further information and better facts come to light.
Aw quit being so stuffy... A bit of healthy speculation keeps the interest levels up.
Otherwise four months of damn hard work by the McCann's just goes to waste. You wouldn't want people saying "Maddie? - Who?" now would you? ;)
Stuffy! Moi?
You come in here and call me Stuffy when you don't even fit on top of the kennel.
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.angelfire.com%2Fspace2%2Fjeffrey2500%2FPictures%2FGarfied_Snoopy.gif&hash=dd4053993cf05a2f22749f176a38017373555a04)
Oi you Lay off! I've got a new friend at No.10 so just watch it.
What was the 'Red cross' anyway?
Post by: Berek on September 12, 2007, 09:48:22 AM
I read today the lawyers are costing ?500 an hour
Post by: GROWLER on September 12, 2007, 09:57:18 AM
Ah, that is how they are being cunning!
Correct....if. ;)
Post by: TG on September 12, 2007, 10:04:25 AM
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91210-1283685,00.htm
Post by: Nick on September 12, 2007, 10:05:12 AM
Post by: Bar Wench on September 12, 2007, 10:06:00 AM
Post by: Nick on September 12, 2007, 10:07:41 AM
Quote
He is also sifting through a 4,000-page dossier as Madeleine's parents face an agonising wait to learn if they will be charged over her disappearance.
He has 10 days to consider the contents - said to be stored in 10 lever arch files.
Post by: Misunderstood on September 12, 2007, 10:08:26 AM
That links to a blank page. Mysterious indeed.
Then it is a (Will remain a) Mystery object. confused:
Post by: Nick on September 12, 2007, 10:08:49 AM
That links to a blank page. Mysterious indeed.
Then it is a (Will remain a) Mystery object. confused:
No, Wenchy's link worked
Post by: Misunderstood on September 12, 2007, 10:12:22 AM
You know journalists are desperate when they write this sort of stuffQuoteHe is also sifting through a 4,000-page dossier as Madeleine's parents face an agonising wait to learn if they will be charged over her disappearance.
He has 10 days to consider the contents - said to be stored in 10 lever arch files.
I suppose it is lucky that the Judge speaks Portugese otherwise it could take years... eyes:
Post by: Berek on September 12, 2007, 01:47:22 PM
Post by: Nick on September 12, 2007, 01:48:49 PM
I sort of hope she did it. The Pope would have probs then!
Post by: Bar Wench on September 12, 2007, 01:51:03 PM
the mystery object has been revealed as her diary, they have also asked for the cuddle cat..the fat relative is horrified
Dear Diary,
What a mess. How did they ever guess it was me. I only wanted a peaceful holiday and now they have guessed that I've told you and that cuddle cat holds the map to Maddy's burial place.
Must go now Gerry wants his tea.
Good grief! What on earth do they think will be in it.
Post by: Nick on September 12, 2007, 01:51:55 PM
Post by: Berek on September 12, 2007, 01:57:45 PM
http://findmadeleine.com/
Post by: Berek on September 12, 2007, 01:58:47 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FskN0E4D92Q&feature=PlayList&p=2B599CA536B70BCF&index=7
Post by: Barman on September 12, 2007, 02:43:35 PM
Oh Wenchy, it wasn't you was it? noooo:the mystery object has been revealed as her diary, they have also asked for the cuddle cat..the fat relative is horrified
Dear Diary,
What a mess. How did they ever guess it was me. I only wanted a peaceful holiday and now they have guessed that I've told you and that cuddle cat holds the map to Maddy's burial place.
Must go now Gerry wants his tea.
Good grief! What on earth do they think will be in it.
Post by: Bar Wench on September 12, 2007, 02:52:01 PM
Oh Wenchy, it wasn't you was it? noooo:the mystery object has been revealed as her diary, they have also asked for the cuddle cat..the fat relative is horrified
Dear Diary,
What a mess. How did they ever guess it was me. I only wanted a peaceful holiday and now they have guessed that I've told you and that cuddle cat holds the map to Maddy's burial place.
Must go now Gerry wants his tea.
Good grief! What on earth do they think will be in it.
Have I been anywhere sunny this year? Have I hell!
Post by: Nick on September 12, 2007, 03:15:26 PM
Post by: Berek on September 12, 2007, 03:27:10 PM
"Gerry and Kate's view is that if they take money from the fund it might be that 90% of people who made donations aren't bothered about it."
"The parents of Madeleine McCann are considering commissioning independent forensic tests on the hire car that they used in Portugal.
A friend of the family says the car is being kept in a "safe place""
Who the fucking hell do they think they are ???
Post by: Barman on September 12, 2007, 03:33:55 PM
I've been on the beach all day... whistle:Oh Wenchy, it wasn't you was it? noooo:the mystery object has been revealed as her diary, they have also asked for the cuddle cat..the fat relative is horrified
Dear Diary,
What a mess. How did they ever guess it was me. I only wanted a peaceful holiday and now they have guessed that I've told you and that cuddle cat holds the map to Maddy's burial place.
Must go now Gerry wants his tea.
Good grief! What on earth do they think will be in it.
Have I been anywhere sunny this year? Have I hell!
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 12, 2007, 04:01:34 PM
heres a laugh ;
"Gerry and Kate's view is that if they take money from the fund it might be that 90% of people who made donations aren't bothered about it."
"The parents of Madeleine McCann are considering commissioning independent forensic tests on the hire car that they used in Portugal.
A friend of the family says the car is being kept in a "safe place""
Who the fucking hell do they think they are ???
You are very quick to make judgements Berek. eeek:
Surely they are entitled to contest any accusations made against them?
Also you're very selective on your use of quotations.
Quote
family spokesman David Hughes said: "They have decided not to seek to use those funds for their legal support."
He said: "Gerry and Kate's view is that if they take money from the fund it might be that 90% of people who made donations aren't bothered about it. But if 10% of people are bothered about it, they don't want to upset them. They want to take the controversy out of the situation."
Post by: Barman on September 13, 2007, 06:28:10 AM
Post by: Berek on September 13, 2007, 06:45:57 PM
Also you're very selective on your use of quotations.
which is why I am considering a career in politics whistle:
[/quote]
Post by: Snoopy on September 13, 2007, 06:47:44 PM
Post by: Berek on September 13, 2007, 07:04:31 PM
Please return this wee babby so she too can enjoy a deep fried Mars Bar
Post by: GROWLER on September 13, 2007, 07:22:25 PM
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.dailymail.co.uk%2Fi%2Fpix%2F2007%2F05_01%2FMcCannAuntG_468x423.jpg&hash=78873ff0a1795e88acc3f1d8701ec6c663cf12ee)
Please return this wee babby so she too can enjoy a deep fried Mars Bar
WHO TF is that one hell of an evil lookin'ugly munter? sick2:
You photoshopped that?
Tell you. I wouldn't like to be alone in me pit at night if SHE walked into the room. scared2:
Post by: Berek on September 13, 2007, 07:29:04 PM
"Philomena McCann, a teacher in Ullapool, northern Scotland, told Sky News television last week: "I'm sorry, but I don't have much faith in the Portuguese police.
"Many times I have questioned since the start what on earth they were doing, but now -- oh, it's just a complete disgrace.""
Post by: GROWLER on September 13, 2007, 07:32:34 PM
Where's her broom?
Wouldn't want her batting for me that's for sure. noooo:
A guilty verdict will surely follow if the jury ever see her in court.
Post by: Berek on September 13, 2007, 07:35:49 PM
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fnewsimg.bbc.co.uk%2Fmedia%2Fimages%2F41413000%2Fjpg%2F_41413254_rabc203.jpg&hash=c2c6ae42dcf152fa05d7ad7419b3842e91c1590b)
Post by: Mr Happy on September 13, 2007, 10:25:41 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBXB_cvdxME&mode=related&search=
Oh no you're her parents aren't you. Once again confiration that she blames response time.
And the great unwashed:
ezza1991 (3 weeks ago) Show Hide Marked as spam 0 (Reply)
Stay strong, and never loose hope. Maddie is out there somewhere, and she should be proud that her mummy and daddy are doing so much to find her. I really hope she comes home soon. You two are being so incredibly strong, this is a horrendous thing to happen to anyone, and you are truly an inspiration.
Hope she comes home soon, and never give up hope.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
jennaleebee (3 weeks ago) Show Hide Marked as spam -1 (Reply)
Gerry and Kate, please do not give up. You will find her, you have done a great job keeping Madeleine's profile up, keep at it. No one will work as hard as you to find her.
Our thoughts and prayers are with you, you will find her.
Idiots!
Post by: Mr Happy on September 13, 2007, 10:32:06 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMUdynuECbE&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ic0D0a2pB0w&NR=1
Gerry's a cnut!
Post by: GROWLER on September 13, 2007, 10:39:32 PM
Not a great deal has been made of the fact that these two bird brains alledgedly left their 3 babies/infants on their own while they went out scoffing and boozing.
Just how many of US would have done the same I wonder?
None I think. noooo:
Kids of that age need to be looked over ALL of the time, or at least present in the same vicinity/building.
IF Madeline was kidnapped, surely the parents would have heard something IF they'd been within earshot, and not guffawing with their high brow chummies. evil:
I don't believe they were checking on their nippers every half hour, as was alledgedly the case. Their 'mates' by agreeing with this are mearley covering up for them, but EVERY half hour isn't / wasn't acceptable in the first place imo. They should have been with them, or have had a bloody pizza delivery at the villa.
Post by: Snoopy on September 14, 2007, 07:36:40 AM
As a positive step, not that it will help recover the child/body or solve the mystery, I have stopped reading all newspapers. At least it stops me getting angry at the piss poor reporting and desperate, almost frantic, scrabblings of the journos for something to print.
Post by: TG on September 14, 2007, 08:01:44 AM
I do not believe they did it. I cant really justify that statement beyond the fact that it makes no real sense to me.
Without re-hashing what is basically 4 months of unsubstantiated rumour and gossip I incline to the opinion that the simplest explanation is usually the right one.
What is easier to believe?
A/ Child killed accidentally/deliberatly by her own parents, body hid for 25 days, moved under nose of the worlds media and still not found. 4 months of scrutiny and no arrests.
B/ Child left unattended. Taken by predatory paedophile who spotted easy pickings or taken to order by organised peadophile gang who had been watching over the proceeding days.
Option B seems the more likely to me.
This is interesting : http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91210-1283987,00.html
At the very least it throws more mud at the Portugese police. point:
Post by: Snoopy on September 14, 2007, 08:03:46 AM
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 14, 2007, 08:48:44 AM
Also you're very selective on your use of quotations.
which is why I am considering a career in politics whistle:
Yes, there has been a gap since Screaming Lord Sutch popped his clogs.
;)
Post by: Darwins Selection on September 14, 2007, 04:18:00 PM
eeek: eeek: eeek:
Also you're very selective on your use of quotations.
which is why I am considering a career in politics whistle:
Yes, there has been a gap since Screaming Lord Sutch popped his clogs.
;)
Is he dead?
Who have I been voting for then?
Post by: Snoopy on September 15, 2007, 10:05:56 AM
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2169867,00.html
Post by: Berek on September 15, 2007, 10:49:12 AM
One thing the McCanns COULD however have learned from it was to buy a baby monitor ( invented because of the Lindbergh case ) which would most likely have the range to be used between the bar and the apartment.. whistle:
Post by: Snoopy on September 15, 2007, 10:53:23 AM
Post by: Berek on September 15, 2007, 10:55:11 AM
"I have started to despise the McCanns. There is something truly irritating about them. I feel no pity for them. They have orchestrated this whole affair. I feel desperately sorry for their twins and for Maddy though. This truly mysterious case has "forced" me to buy newspapers I would never otherwise buy, and has intrigued me beyond belief for months. I loathe the way they have become media "darlings" (yes, they are being hounded by the media), but they are being courted by the glossies, and the TV stations, and just wait for the book, the novel, the film, the TV series. They will become multi-millionaires because of what has happened to them, and this is wholly unfair to the parents of the hundreds and hundreds of children that go missing in the world every year. I feel that a visit to the Pope is tantamount to a religious confession, and a request to be delivered from sin. I have two children, and I know the sacrifice involved as do other parents. It stinks that these parents have not held their twins close to them every minute of every day after their daughter went missing, and that every glimpse of them in the press was of them holding hands and walking along the beach, or her jogging, or him talking on his mobile. Their own courting of the media stinks. The money shoved their way on account of their missing daughter stinks too. How many other missing children's parents have received this kind of financial aid? How can they justify leaving Portugal for the sake of their twins? Two-year-old children are too young to have a notion of what is "normal life". For two-year-olds, being in a loving environment where their needs are fully met, with Mum and Dad is "normal". They wouldn't have any clue as to where they actually are, nor would they care. The whole business is highly suspicious, and I am sick to death of their poker faces dominating the news. God bless little Maddie, and the twins though. Joanna "
Post by: Snoopy on September 15, 2007, 11:00:53 AM
What is getting me down about the whole affair is the speculation. Throw enough ideas into the pot and eventually someone will be able to say "I told you so" whilst all the others will keep quiet or claim "to have know all along but not able to say because ....."
Do you think we will ever really get to the truth?
It seems unlikely to me
Post by: Berek on September 15, 2007, 06:49:39 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMUdynuECbE&NR=1
you wouldnt like this cameraman as a mate, I can't tell if Gerry swears or not.. some reckon he does
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUcVncYr6xc&mode=related&search=
Post by: Snoopy on September 15, 2007, 06:53:54 PM
Quote
Girl's Case 'May Solve McCann Mystery'
By Alex Watts
Sky News Online Reporter
Updated: 09:28, Friday September 14, 2007
Portuguese detectives have been urged to ditch their case against Gerry and Kate McCann and re-open the investigation into a girl who disappeared in similar circumstances to Madeleine.
Crime expert Mark Williams-Thomas believes there are far too many similarities between the two cases for it not to be a strong line of police inquiry.
Mr Williams-Thomas, a former detective who is now a child protection specialist, said: "I can't accept that Gerry and Kate as parents of the child could have been involved in her murder - even based on the fact that over 90% of murders are domestic-related.
"What I have difficulty in understanding is they would have killed her and stored her body for at least 25 days and left no evidence.
"At the very least the body would have started to decompose, especially in a hot country. And there was a huge risk of someone finding that body."
He believes the answer to the case may lie in the disappearance of an eight-year-old Portuguese girl in 2004.
Joana Cipriano vanished from a village just seven miles from Praia da Luz, where Madeleine disappeared.
Neither body has been found.
Joana's mother and uncle were jailed for her murder, but five police officers have now been accused of forcing false confessions out of them.
Mr Williams-Thomas believes that because of the huge doubts over the convictions, whoever abducted Joana is more than likely to be behind Madeleine's disappearance.
Joana vanished in Figueira
He said he could not understand why the police are pursuing their "ludicrous" investigation into the McCanns, when such a strong line of inquiry remains open.
He added: "There's not a single case in the UK where two children who are unknown to each other have been abducted or disappeared within a period of four years in a seven-mile radius.
"On that basis it has to be a serious line of inquiry to eliminate it as a huge coincidence.
"Portugal is a small country with very, very few abductions so two young girls vanishing out of thin air with their bodies never being recovered is something that needs to be investigated."
Joana vanished on September 12, 2004, after setting off from home in the village of Figueira to collect groceries. She never returned.
Like Madeleine McCann's case, the police investigation got off to a bad start. They failed to seal off the house where she was last seen.
Joana's mother Leonor and her brother Joao were jailed for 16 years for her murder.
But they claim they were set up and police have been named as suspects in their "torture".
Cipriano alleges police beat her to make her confess. A photograph of her heavily-bruised face was published in Portuguese newspapers.
She says the interrogation took place without her lawyer present and without the knowledge of the public prosecutor.
Police claimed Joana discovered Cipriano and her brother having sex when she returned with the groceries.
They said the pair were afraid Joana would tell what she saw and killed her.
Mr Williams-Thomas says because of the doubt over the safety of the convictions, the case should be re-opened.
But to compound the Madeleine investigation further, a senior detective in the hunt is one of the five officers alleged to have extracted the confessions.
Goncalo Amaral, who is number three in the Madeleine inquiry, and his officers have been accused of torture, omission of evidence and falsification of documents.
Portugal's Ministerio Publico has not revealed who has been accused of which offence.
Mr Williams-Thomas said: "This casts huge doubt in my mind about the integrity of the investigating officer.
"Even if we work on the basis that he is innocent, given this allegation against him, he shouldn't have anything to do with the Madeleine investigation."
He stressed: "There are so many similarities between the cases it has to be eliminated.
"Therefore to consider solely Kate and Gerry McCann as suspects rather than considering all the options is ludicrous."
The former detective also heavily criticised the Portuguese police inquiry into Madeleine's disappearance.
Commenting on their emergency application to seize Gerry McCann's laptop computer and reportedly even Madeleine's favourite toy Cuddle Cat, he said: "I think it's amazing that they haven't already seized them.
"This is the whole problem with the case. They are treating Kate and Gerry McCann as suspects but aren't dealing with them as suspects.
"Why didn't they do that when she went missing? They are back-tracking.
"They are trying to recover the situation, forensically and evidentally, they lost at the first opportunity."
Another crime expert believes even if the police do charge the McCanns they will struggle to convict them - because Madeleine's body is still missing and there is no evidence that has been made public to suggest she is even dead.
Desmond Thomas, a former deputy head of Hampshire CID who is now a forensic management consultant, says he does not believe anyone will be found guilty unless a body or weapon is discovered.
He said: "I think the Portuguese police are struggling. Of course, we cannot be sure about exactly what is in the dossier they have prepared.
"But from what we know this far, if I was bringing the charges, I would be nervous about it being successful.
"The only way I can see anyone being successfully charged is if the body is found and they can link it clearly to them."
This may be some solace to the McCanns, but then Portuguese courts may have a different conviction rate to UK courts.
After all, detectives managed to "solve" Joana's murder, and there was no body or weapon found.
Post by: Misunderstood on September 15, 2007, 07:48:32 PM
It may be safely assumed then, that the police are sensitive to the accusations made of the first and keen to avoid parallel with the the second.
Everyone has skeletons in their cupboards if you look hard enough... even the police.
Post by: Barman on September 16, 2007, 08:28:29 AM
With a million pounds in the bank I think they?d garner more sympathy if they expanded it a little and did something worthwhile to trace all missing children, not just Maddy? noooo:
Post by: Snoopy on September 16, 2007, 08:38:52 AM
The presence of the same detective on both cases precludes any notion that the similarities in the cases have been overlooked.
It may be safely assumed then, that the police are sensitive to the accusations made of the first and keen to avoid parallel with the the second.
Everyone has skeletons in their cupboards if you look hard enough... even the police.
Often them more than most.
Statistically, taking each occupation as a single group:
Doctors are the heaviest abusers of Alcohol and Drugs
Part Time Fire Officers are most likely to be Arsonists and strangely Peeping Toms/Flashers
Police Officers are more likely than any other single profession to be wife beaters (The modern term being Domestic Abusers)
Please don't demand sources as I cannot provide them ~ I was told this years ago, when I worked in security, by a very senior member of the Home Office. The comment about Firemen was confirmed later by several investigations we had to carry out into various incidents at a number of North London Hospitals and the fact that two out of the three GPs at my local surgery are barred from every pub in the area speaks for itself. As for Policemen ~ speak to any bobby's wife and she will be able to confirm that her husband's colleagues are too often free with their fists at home.
Post by: Snoopy on September 16, 2007, 08:41:50 AM
I see they are planning a major advertising campaign to find her?
With a million pounds in the bank I think they?d garner more sympathy if they expanded it a little and did something worthwhile to trace all missing children, not just Maddy? noooo:
I suspect that will happen in time. At the moment they will be hidebound by the rules of the Charity and anyway it will be for the trustees to decide. Charity laws are very specific on the uses that money given for a particular purpose may be put to. To do anything else would, at this time, be a clear breach of the law and many hoops will need to be jumped through before they could do that. It is not their money at this stage.
Post by: Snoopy on September 16, 2007, 01:19:46 PM
Post by: Berek on September 16, 2007, 05:17:39 PM
he must be crackers whistle:
Post by: Mr Happy on September 16, 2007, 05:39:53 PM
Cnut!
Post by: The Moan Ranger on September 16, 2007, 05:44:29 PM
Post by: Barman on September 16, 2007, 05:46:32 PM
Post by: Mr Happy on September 16, 2007, 05:56:59 PM
Perhaps Branson was the mystery witness.
'I was ballooning over a Portugese church one day...'
As an aside, not that I care one jot, is Branson a shirtlifter? I find it unthinkable that someone of his cash has not been in the paper for inability to rise to the ocassion with a prozzie or kiddyfiddling. What's your vice record boy?
Post by: Berek on September 16, 2007, 06:10:25 PM
Post by: Barman on September 16, 2007, 06:10:53 PM
As an aside, not that I care one jot, is Branson a shirtlifter? I find it unthinkable that someone of his cash has not been in the paper for inability to rise to the ocassion with a prozzie or kiddyfiddling. What's your vice record boy?Agreed? If I had his money I would ensure I was surrounded by big breasted bimbos at all times? rubschin:
Post by: Marley's Ghost (Imbiber of Spirits) on September 16, 2007, 06:12:13 PM
having met Richard Branson and conversed at some length ( in a business class lounge at LA airport ) I can assure you he is a mans man.. whistle:
So, now we know. Branson lifts shirts in his spare time. Thanks Berek.
Post by: Mr Happy on September 16, 2007, 06:12:33 PM
Post by: Nick on September 16, 2007, 06:13:20 PM
having met Richard Branson and conversed at some length ( in a business class lounge at LA airport ) I can assure you he is a mans man.. whistle:
I would love to hear Branson's account of that encounter!
Post by: Barman on September 16, 2007, 06:14:25 PM
?Guards, guards!? point:having met Richard Branson and conversed at some length ( in a business class lounge at LA airport ) I can assure you he is a mans man.. whistle:
I would love to hear Branson's account of that encounter!
Post by: Darwins Selection on September 16, 2007, 06:20:15 PM
having met Richard Branson and conversed at some length ( in a business class lounge at LA airport ) I can assure you he is a mans man.. whistle:The fact that he didn't try it on with you is hardly a cast iron snigger guarantee of his heterosexuality. ::)
Post by: Barman on September 16, 2007, 06:23:12 PM
Indeed, he had an eight hour flight and some fresh, young flight stewards to look forward to? allegedly. whistle:having met Richard Branson and conversed at some length ( in a business class lounge at LA airport ) I can assure you he is a mans man.. whistle:The fact that he didn't try it on with you is hardly a cast iron snigger guarantee of his heterosexuality. ::)
Post by: Darwins Selection on September 16, 2007, 06:25:10 PM
Branson or Berek?Indeed, he had an eight hour flight and some fresh, young flight stewards to look forward to? allegedly. whistle:having met Richard Branson and conversed at some length ( in a business class lounge at LA airport ) I can assure you he is a mans man.. whistle:The fact that he didn't try it on with you is hardly a cast iron snigger guarantee of his heterosexuality. ::)
Post by: Barman on September 16, 2007, 06:26:40 PM
If he was flying business, both I suppose? shrugs:Branson or Berek?Indeed, he had an eight hour flight and some fresh, young flight stewards to look forward to? allegedly. whistle:having met Richard Branson and conversed at some length ( in a business class lounge at LA airport ) I can assure you he is a mans man.. whistle:The fact that he didn't try it on with you is hardly a cast iron snigger guarantee of his heterosexuality. ::)
Post by: Mr Happy on September 16, 2007, 06:32:24 PM
I knew Berek would look good in drag, the man boobs relly fill that blouse...
Post by: Nick on September 16, 2007, 06:33:36 PM
Isn't that a train?
Post by: Barman on September 16, 2007, 06:35:07 PM
Terrible pic in almost every respect.Or an extremely low flying aircraft? whistle:
Isn't that a train?
Post by: Mr Happy on September 16, 2007, 06:46:51 PM
Post by: Darwins Selection on September 16, 2007, 09:28:53 PM
Apologies it was much smaller when i posted it, it still had Branso in it though...Isn't his hand in the picture in that other chaps crotch?
Post by: Misunderstood on September 16, 2007, 10:57:13 PM
Do they make them refill their own cartridges now? eeek:
Post by: Barman on September 17, 2007, 05:17:32 AM
That certainly appears to be the case Darwin? whistle:Apologies it was much smaller when i posted it, it still had Branso in it though...Isn't his hand in the picture in that other chaps crotch?
Post by: The Moan Ranger on September 17, 2007, 09:38:18 AM
http://www.barrybeelzebub.co.uk/
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 17, 2007, 09:48:23 AM
Quote from: barrybeelzebub
The internet is a wonderful thing, but the quicker they introduce an intelligence test that people have to pass before they?re allowed to log on, the better.
So very, very true.
Post by: Snoopy on September 17, 2007, 09:58:00 AM
Excellent - I'll add him to my favourite blogs.Quote from: barrybeelzebubThe internet is a wonderful thing, but the quicker they introduce an intelligence test that people have to pass before they?re allowed to log on, the better.
So very, very true.
That might well leave you talking to yourself then. whistle:
Post by: Nick on September 17, 2007, 10:06:15 AM
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 17, 2007, 10:08:32 AM
Post by: Nick on September 17, 2007, 10:09:20 AM
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 17, 2007, 10:12:50 AM
Post by: Nick on September 17, 2007, 10:13:55 AM
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 17, 2007, 10:17:05 AM
Post by: Snoopy on September 17, 2007, 10:17:41 AM
I assume we are awaiting a new theory
Post by: Nick on September 17, 2007, 10:19:14 AM
Post by: Snoopy on September 17, 2007, 10:20:37 AM
Post by: Nick on September 17, 2007, 10:21:26 AM
Post by: Snoopy on September 17, 2007, 10:22:10 AM
Post by: Misunderstood on September 17, 2007, 10:37:55 AM
Probably nicked the kid himself 'cos he was bored. eeek:
Post by: Nick on September 17, 2007, 10:41:07 AM
I should say, that as a dad myself it must be frightful, but the hysteria and incompetence surrounding this whole thing is weird. I know that we are the most surveilled (?) nation on the planet (except N. Korea) but if they had the same amount of CCTV over there, this would have been over long ago. Worrying.
Post by: Misunderstood on September 17, 2007, 10:49:08 AM
But there isn't and I'm not.
Post by: Nick on September 17, 2007, 10:50:47 AM
Post by: Snoopy on September 17, 2007, 10:55:31 AM
If there was any kind of link whatsoever between CCTV and crime detection I would be in favour of it.
But there isn't and I'm not.
In my experience at the very beginning of CCTV installation moved some problems to areas without cameras. Then the police cottoned onto another way of sitting on their collective arse and watching crime at a safe distance. It didn't take the criminals long to work out the response times and, to be honest it took the graffiti merchants even less time to discover a whole new audience for their "art".
Most CCTV images are not admissible in court as evidence anyway and the whole thing is a waste of time, space and money BUT it does enable politicos and senior policemen to say "We are doing something"
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 17, 2007, 10:59:12 AM
Post by: Nick on September 17, 2007, 11:02:48 AM
WHo watches the watchers?
Post by: Misunderstood on September 17, 2007, 11:06:43 AM
Maybe they should put CCTV in the confessional. rubschin: Maybe the already do... scared2:
Post by: Misunderstood on September 18, 2007, 11:29:17 AM
So what?
My daughter did that. She drove us all to distraction, more that once I fantasised about chucking her out of the window, Most of our near neighbours fancied throttling her too.
I used to go into work at three or four in the morning, just to get some peace and quiet. As a family we were emotional wrecks, zombies for eighteen months.
Looking back, I can't imagine how we kept going - all of us within hearing range.
But Hey! She's forty now.
I don't buy it.
Post by: Snoopy on September 18, 2007, 11:47:57 AM
Post by: Misunderstood on September 18, 2007, 11:52:14 AM
Post by: Snoopy on September 18, 2007, 11:55:36 AM
Umm! Last one was quite quiet, a determined pyromaniac though. noooo:
Yes we had one of those ~ until gambling got him in his teens. Haven't spoken to him for years. He's 40 next year.
Post by: Misunderstood on September 18, 2007, 11:57:14 AM
Post by: Bar Wench on September 18, 2007, 11:57:35 AM
Post by: Nick on September 18, 2007, 12:04:09 PM
Post by: Misunderstood on September 18, 2007, 12:06:31 PM
Does anyone here have normal well behaved kids? I was positively angelic and boring by the sounds of things. eeek:
Yes. I had two of them. Unremarkable.
Post by: Nick on September 18, 2007, 12:07:20 PM
Roll on 2015!!
Post by: Snoopy on September 18, 2007, 12:09:14 PM
Does anyone here have normal well behaved kids? I was positively angelic and boring by the sounds of things. eeek:
Betcha you were not. These are normal kids we are talking about.
The problems with children are
(i) There is no training for the job ~ you pick it up as you go along.
(ii) Every child is different so it doesn't matter what you did with the previous one ... the same things will not work with the current one.
(iii) They are us, only younger and without experience.
(iv) They believe they are the first who ever did anything, thought any thought or encountered any situation.
(v) They do not realise that you were once a kid yourself.
(vi) They do not come with an operators manual nor a help desk number (unless you count your own parents whose reaction is usually to roll about laughing)
Post by: Nick on September 18, 2007, 12:10:32 PM
Post by: Bar Wench on September 18, 2007, 12:11:00 PM
Does anyone here have normal well behaved kids? I was positively angelic and boring by the sounds of things. eeek:
Betcha you were not. These are normal kids we are talking about.
The problems with children are
(i) There is no training for the job ~ you pick it up as you go along.
(ii) Every child is different so it doesn't matter what you did with the previous one ... the same things will not work with the current one.
(iii) They are us, only younger and without experience.
(iv) They believe they are the first who ever did anything, thought any thought or encountered any situation.
(v) They do not realise that you were once a kid yourself.
(vi) They do not come with an operators manual nor a help desk number (unless you count your own parents whose reaction is usually to roll about laughing)
Honestly until the age of 19 when I dropped out of college the most worry I gave my parents was behaviour wise was being caught smoking. I didn't sneak out, set things on fire, get into trouble at school, have inappropriate boyfriends, cut myself, drink too much, have an eating disorder. eeek:
Post by: Nick on September 18, 2007, 12:12:32 PM
Does anyone here have normal well behaved kids? I was positively angelic and boring by the sounds of things. eeek:
Betcha you were not. These are normal kids we are talking about.
The problems with children are
(i) There is no training for the job ~ you pick it up as you go along.
(ii) Every child is different so it doesn't matter what you did with the previous one ... the same things will not work with the current one.
(iii) They are us, only younger and without experience.
(iv) They believe they are the first who ever did anything, thought any thought or encountered any situation.
(v) They do not realise that you were once a kid yourself.
(vi) They do not come with an operators manual nor a help desk number (unless you count your own parents whose reaction is usually to roll about laughing)
Honestly until the age of 19 when I dropped out of college the most worry I gave my parents was behaviour wise was being caught smoking. I didn't sneak out, set things on fire, get into trouble at school, have inappropriate boyfriends, cut myself, drink too much, have an eating disorder. eeek:
I guess you have caught up on all that now then!
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 18, 2007, 12:14:16 PM
Twins are serious hard work eeek:
Post by: Bar Wench on September 18, 2007, 12:16:48 PM
Does anyone here have normal well behaved kids? I was positively angelic and boring by the sounds of things. eeek:
Betcha you were not. These are normal kids we are talking about.
The problems with children are
(i) There is no training for the job ~ you pick it up as you go along.
(ii) Every child is different so it doesn't matter what you did with the previous one ... the same things will not work with the current one.
(iii) They are us, only younger and without experience.
(iv) They believe they are the first who ever did anything, thought any thought or encountered any situation.
(v) They do not realise that you were once a kid yourself.
(vi) They do not come with an operators manual nor a help desk number (unless you count your own parents whose reaction is usually to roll about laughing)
Honestly until the age of 19 when I dropped out of college the most worry I gave my parents was behaviour wise was being caught smoking. I didn't sneak out, set things on fire, get into trouble at school, have inappropriate boyfriends, cut myself, drink too much, have an eating disorder. eeek:
I guess you have caught up on all that now then!
One freak of a boyfriend but I was on prescribed drugs at the time so can't be held responsible. Mr Wench is considered most suitable and I am a settled young lady with a proper job. So other than two years where I was depressed and dropped out of college I haven't caused any major upset. I leave all that to Brother Wench. Crikey I really am a dullard. eeek:
Post by: Snoopy on September 18, 2007, 12:17:24 PM
Does anyone here have normal well behaved kids? I was positively angelic and boring by the sounds of things. eeek:
Betcha you were not. These are normal kids we are talking about.
The problems with children are
(i) There is no training for the job ~ you pick it up as you go along.
(ii) Every child is different so it doesn't matter what you did with the previous one ... the same things will not work with the current one.
(iii) They are us, only younger and without experience.
(iv) They believe they are the first who ever did anything, thought any thought or encountered any situation.
(v) They do not realise that you were once a kid yourself.
(vi) They do not come with an operators manual nor a help desk number (unless you count your own parents whose reaction is usually to roll about laughing)
Honestly until the age of 19 when I dropped out of college the most worry I gave my parents was behaviour wise was being caught smoking. I didn't sneak out, set things on fire, get into trouble at school, have inappropriate boyfriends, cut myself, drink too much, have an eating disorder. eeek:
Trust us Wenchy ~ you gave them sleepless nights, you worried them silly when your temperature rose above 100F
You caused them to sit night after night arguing about what to do about new clothes, the rate at which you were/or were not growing. The children you mixed with at school, why you hadn't been invited to so & so's party, your refusal to eat something, the rash on your tummy, the car sickness if you sat in the back, whether they could risk letting you go to France with the school. The list is endless and some items may not apply to you specifically as all children are different but the problems are pretty much the same.
Post by: Nick on September 18, 2007, 12:17:32 PM
Don't forget the McCann twins.
Twins are serious hard work eeek:
Oh yes, we were drifting. Thanks
Post by: Nick on September 18, 2007, 12:18:52 PM
Does anyone here have normal well behaved kids? I was positively angelic and boring by the sounds of things. eeek:
Betcha you were not. These are normal kids we are talking about.
The problems with children are
(i) There is no training for the job ~ you pick it up as you go along.
(ii) Every child is different so it doesn't matter what you did with the previous one ... the same things will not work with the current one.
(iii) They are us, only younger and without experience.
(iv) They believe they are the first who ever did anything, thought any thought or encountered any situation.
(v) They do not realise that you were once a kid yourself.
(vi) They do not come with an operators manual nor a help desk number (unless you count your own parents whose reaction is usually to roll about laughing)
Honestly until the age of 19 when I dropped out of college the most worry I gave my parents was behaviour wise was being caught smoking. I didn't sneak out, set things on fire, get into trouble at school, have inappropriate boyfriends, cut myself, drink too much, have an eating disorder. eeek:
Trust us Wenchy ~ you gave them sleepless nights, you worried them silly when your temperature rose above 100F
You caused them to sit night after night arguing about what to do about new clothes, the rate at which you were/or were not growing. The children you mixed with at school, why you hadn't been invited to so & so's party, your refusal to eat something, the rash on your tummy, the car sickness if you sat in the back, whether they could risk letting you go to France with the school. The list is endless and some items may not apply to you specifically as all children are different but the problems are pretty much the same.
Agreed. Made harder when he sometimes says, "YOU aren't my real Mum and Dad, so I can find some new ones" sad24:
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 18, 2007, 12:21:41 PM
Agreed. Made harder when he sometimes says, "YOU aren't my real Mum and Dad, so I can find some new ones" sad24:
Gulp sad24:
happy100
Post by: Nick on September 18, 2007, 12:22:54 PM
Post by: Snoopy on September 18, 2007, 12:23:21 PM
Does anyone here have normal well behaved kids? I was positively angelic and boring by the sounds of things. eeek:
Betcha you were not. These are normal kids we are talking about.
The problems with children are
(i) There is no training for the job ~ you pick it up as you go along.
(ii) Every child is different so it doesn't matter what you did with the previous one ... the same things will not work with the current one.
(iii) They are us, only younger and without experience.
(iv) They believe they are the first who ever did anything, thought any thought or encountered any situation.
(v) They do not realise that you were once a kid yourself.
(vi) They do not come with an operators manual nor a help desk number (unless you count your own parents whose reaction is usually to roll about laughing)
Honestly until the age of 19 when I dropped out of college the most worry I gave my parents was behaviour wise was being caught smoking. I didn't sneak out, set things on fire, get into trouble at school, have inappropriate boyfriends, cut myself, drink too much, have an eating disorder. eeek:
Trust us Wenchy ~ you gave them sleepless nights, you worried them silly when your temperature rose above 100F
You caused them to sit night after night arguing about what to do about new clothes, the rate at which you were/or were not growing. The children you mixed with at school, why you hadn't been invited to so & so's party, your refusal to eat something, the rash on your tummy, the car sickness if you sat in the back, whether they could risk letting you go to France with the school. The list is endless and some items may not apply to you specifically as all children are different but the problems are pretty much the same.
Agreed. Made harder when he sometimes says, "YOU aren't my real Mum and Dad, so I can find some new ones" sad24:
OUCH!
But understandable I suppose.
We were impressed at the ease with which he calls you "Dad" and that you responded to it without hesitation.
He has to hurt you from time to time ~ they all do. That is an easy one for him to use but I really don't think he means it as he clearly worships you ~ that was very obvious.
Post by: Nick on September 18, 2007, 12:24:31 PM
That's nice to hear. Miss Netball Kit cloud9: says he is doing fine with her.
SO would I actually eeek:
Post by: Bar Wench on September 18, 2007, 12:26:48 PM
Post by: Nick on September 18, 2007, 12:27:32 PM
And also mine eyes:
Post by: Bar Wench on September 18, 2007, 12:29:28 PM
Post by: Nick on September 18, 2007, 12:31:46 PM
We bought him a digital in Toronto. Hmmmmmmmm, good plan!
Post by: Bar Wench on September 18, 2007, 12:33:06 PM
I had thought of that, but he can work it better than me. There's a thought. But then I have to get the pic off the phone and onto here rubschin:
We bought him a digital in Toronto. Hmmmmmmmm, good plan!
NOOOOOO do NOT ask The Boy to do that. He seems happy at this school.
Post by: Nick on September 18, 2007, 12:36:19 PM
I can post it in the Secret Boys' Area. They have been asking me, you know.
Post by: Bar Wench on September 18, 2007, 12:36:52 PM
He can snap her in her Gym Kit.
I can post it in the Secret Boys' Area. They have been asking me, you know.
cussing:
Post by: Nick on September 18, 2007, 12:39:46 PM
* non-sweaty
Post by: Bar Wench on September 18, 2007, 12:41:03 PM
I could PM you the "polite"* ones
* non-sweaty
You could. On the other hand do I want to be called as a witness in the Miss Netball 2007 stalker case? rubschin:
Post by: Snoopy on September 18, 2007, 12:43:23 PM
I could PM you the "polite"* ones
* non-sweaty
You could. On the other hand do I want to be called as a witness in the Miss Netball 2007 stalker case? rubschin:
No but you do want to check out the "opposition". cool14:
Post by: Bar Wench on September 18, 2007, 12:44:10 PM
I could PM you the "polite"* ones
* non-sweaty
You could. On the other hand do I want to be called as a witness in the Miss Netball 2007 stalker case? rubschin:
No but you do want to check out the "opposition". cool14:
Opposition? You mean I'm not the only lady in your lives? sad24:
Post by: Misunderstood on September 18, 2007, 12:44:24 PM
Does anyone here have normal well behaved kids? I was positively angelic and boring by the sounds of things. eeek:
Betcha you were not. These are normal kids we are talking about.
The problems with children are
(i) There is no training for the job ~ you pick it up as you go along.
(ii) Every child is different so it doesn't matter what you did with the previous one ... the same things will not work with the current one.
(iii) They are us, only younger and without experience.
(iv) They believe they are the first who ever did anything, thought any thought or encountered any situation.
(v) They do not realise that you were once a kid yourself.
(vi) They do not come with an operators manual nor a help desk number (unless you count your own parents whose reaction is usually to roll about laughing)
Yep! And really, REALLY enjoying it too. ;D
Post by: Nick on September 18, 2007, 12:45:23 PM
I could PM you the "polite"* ones
* non-sweaty
You could. On the other hand do I want to be called as a witness in the Miss Netball 2007 stalker case? rubschin:
No but you do want to check out the "opposition". cool14:
Opposition? You mean I'm not the only lady in your lives? sad24:
I could make a list.............. whistle:
Post by: Snoopy on September 18, 2007, 12:46:45 PM
Does anyone here have normal well behaved kids? I was positively angelic and boring by the sounds of things. eeek:
Betcha you were not. These are normal kids we are talking about.
The problems with children are
(i) There is no training for the job ~ you pick it up as you go along.
(ii) Every child is different so it doesn't matter what you did with the previous one ... the same things will not work with the current one.
(iii) They are us, only younger and without experience.
(iv) They believe they are the first who ever did anything, thought any thought or encountered any situation.
(v) They do not realise that you were once a kid yourself.
(vi) They do not come with an operators manual nor a help desk number (unless you count your own parents whose reaction is usually to roll about laughing)
Yep! And really, REALLY enjoying it too. ;D
Yes ~ that's the bit I enjoy about being a Granddad.
Q: What's the best thing about grandchildren?
A: You can give them back.
Post by: Bar Wench on September 18, 2007, 12:48:00 PM
I could PM you the "polite"* ones
* non-sweaty
You could. On the other hand do I want to be called as a witness in the Miss Netball 2007 stalker case? rubschin:
No but you do want to check out the "opposition". cool14:
Opposition? You mean I'm not the only lady in your lives? sad24:
I could make a list.............. whistle:
I'm so hurt. ::)
Post by: Snoopy on September 18, 2007, 12:52:22 PM
I could PM you the "polite"* ones
* non-sweaty
You could. On the other hand do I want to be called as a witness in the Miss Netball 2007 stalker case? rubschin:
No but you do want to check out the "opposition". cool14:
Opposition? You mean I'm not the only lady in your lives? sad24:
I could make a list.............. whistle:
I'm so hurt. ::)
Don't be silly ~ every woman sees every other woman as potential opposition.
That's why every girl has an ugly, overweight friend ~ to boost her ego and her chances.
BTW Why do they always claim that the F & U friend has a "Lovely personality" --- as if anyone is interested in her mind. ::)
Post by: Nick on September 18, 2007, 12:53:41 PM
Post by: Bar Wench on September 18, 2007, 12:56:15 PM
Post by: Misunderstood on September 18, 2007, 01:03:01 PM
Post by: Bar Wench on September 18, 2007, 01:04:04 PM
happy100
It's fine. sad24: Am now going to look at old pictures of me on facebook to assure myself I was not in fact a munter. sad24:
Post by: Misunderstood on September 18, 2007, 01:19:16 PM
Post by: Nick on September 18, 2007, 01:20:14 PM
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 18, 2007, 01:22:50 PM
I usually ended up with the munter cry: Nice personalities though...
Same here. I used to pre-empt my mate's comment by say "I don't fancy mine much"
Post by: Barman on September 18, 2007, 01:23:38 PM
lol: lol: lol:I usually ended up with the munter cry: Nice personalities though...
Same here. I used to pre-empt my mate's comment by say "I don't fancy mine much"
Post by: Misunderstood on September 18, 2007, 01:23:53 PM
I usually ended up with the munter cry: Nice personalities though...
Same here. I used to pre-empt my mate's comment by say "I don't fancy mine much"
lol: lol: lol:
Post by: Barman on September 18, 2007, 01:24:21 PM
Post by: Snoopy on September 18, 2007, 01:25:34 PM
Post by: Misunderstood on September 18, 2007, 01:26:45 PM
My answer to the problem was to find myself a little fat mate. "Look" I would cry "A match made in heaven" whistle:
Nooo! You were supposed to go after the girls... confused:
Post by: Bar Wench on September 18, 2007, 01:27:08 PM
Post by: Snoopy on September 18, 2007, 01:27:48 PM
Post by: Misunderstood on September 18, 2007, 01:41:07 PM
Stupid Cat! evil:
>snigger<
Post by: Berek on September 18, 2007, 01:59:23 PM
I see Team McCann and the Tapas 9 have a new media PR fella. All the papers and media in general are now shite scared to say anything because the top lawyers are watching and reading every word.
I was saying to Meg last night that IF they get off with it they will always be viewed with suspicion, the poor mites body needs to be found otherwise this will become another Jon Bennet Ramsay and they will always be suspects
I don't often agree with Jon Gaunt but he had it all cock on in his column today.
Post by: Snoopy on September 18, 2007, 02:08:31 PM
The last PR had to return to her normal job and was only ever there on a short term contract.
'Bout time the papers backed off a bit ~ it was all getting out of hand. Accusation after accusation without a shred of evidence. Many of the papers have been made to look pretty stupid now with the weekend revelations about the Portuguese Police and their methods of obtaining "confessions".
A body is needed to clear it all up ~ or for the child to be found alive and well cared for by someone who just wanted a little blonde baby.
Post by: Marley's Ghost (Imbiber of Spirits) on September 18, 2007, 03:19:53 PM
I usually ended up with the munter cry: Nice personalities though...
Actually, a mate of mine always reckoned to go for the munter 'cos she'd be good in other ways to compensate - if you get my drift. And I'm not talking about their personalities!
Post by: TG on September 18, 2007, 03:26:32 PM
getting back on topic and away from the flirting..
Nice try Berek. 2 whole posts on topic. surrender:
Post by: Snoopy on September 18, 2007, 03:28:41 PM
Post by: TG on September 18, 2007, 03:29:40 PM
Who's John Gaunt anyway? Another suspect??
Same here. never heard of him. Sounds guilty to me.
Post by: Snoopy on September 18, 2007, 03:31:51 PM
Post by: Snoopy on September 18, 2007, 03:36:42 PM
Berek means this fella:
Quote
Jon Gaunt is a morning talk show presenter.
Gaunt has worked for many radio stations, including BBC Three Counties Radio, BBC WM, BBC London, and BBC Coventry & Warwickshire. He currently hosts a mid-morning current affairs show ("The Jon Gaunt Show") on talkSPORT. Gaunt was awarded three Sony Radio Academy Gold Awards in 2001. [1]
Gaunt has dealt with controversy during his career; he has faced the UK Broadcasting Standards Commission five times; three of the complaints made against him were upheld.
In other words a self opinionated, third rate broadcaster on Talk Sport who cannot get a job on the BBC because of his "record" ::)
Fat f*cker too
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bbc.co.uk%2Finfo%2Freport2001%2Fimages%2F3counties_jon_gaunt.jpg&hash=ac30d19fa8b4d50a590479857ae021da84aac51f)
Post by: TG on September 18, 2007, 03:39:10 PM
Post by: TG on September 18, 2007, 03:44:54 PM
TalkSport is great when it is focusing on sport. Anything else and I would steer well clear.
Post by: Snoopy on September 18, 2007, 03:47:15 PM
Post by: Nick on September 18, 2007, 04:23:58 PM
Post by: Snoopy on September 18, 2007, 04:34:28 PM
But once again no news means either speculation, reruns of previous postings or meandering thoughts brought about by the posts in general.
Post by: Berek on September 18, 2007, 06:08:29 PM
Post by: Snoopy on September 18, 2007, 06:48:46 PM
Thanks B for the confirmation.
Post by: Berek on September 19, 2007, 09:59:23 AM
Post by: Barman on September 19, 2007, 10:05:04 AM
apparently now the piss wet nappies mixed with the sweat in Maddies sandals thus causing the liquid DNA found in the car.. drumroll:They said on t?wireless this morning that the DNA came from the twins and would therefore be a perfect match for Maddie? rubschin:
Post by: Snoopy on September 19, 2007, 12:35:00 PM
Post by: Barman on September 19, 2007, 12:36:53 PM
Do I detect the sounds of a lifeboat being launched?I thought it was the Batfone ringing... whistle:
Post by: Snoopy on September 19, 2007, 12:42:39 PM
Do I detect the sounds of a lifeboat being launched?I thought it was the Batfone ringing... whistle:
Nah ~ the buggers are rowing for the safety of the shore as we speak. ::)
Post by: Misunderstood on September 19, 2007, 01:17:13 PM
Like fingerprints before it, DNA was touted as a method of ascertaining with absolute certainty, the identity of the owner of the sample.
It seems that is demonstrably not true any more.
Not a big deal for me as I only have one sibling, but it must throw a large slice of doubt on anyone from a large family that has been convicted on DNA records and just circumstantial evidence.
Very worrying, given the government's determination to establish a nationwide database. I might have siblings that I don't know about... eeek: No-one is safe.... scared2:
Post by: Bar Wench on September 19, 2007, 01:18:34 PM
Very worrying, given the government's determination to establish a nationwide database. I might have siblings that I don't know about... eeek: No-one is safe.... scared2:
I'm pretty sure I do. It's all quite worrying.
Post by: Nick on September 19, 2007, 01:20:55 PM
I'm quite concerned about this...
Like fingerprints before it, DNA was touted as a method of ascertaining with absolute certainty, the identity of the owner of the sample.
It seems that is demonstrably not true any more.
Not a big deal for me as I only have one sibling, but it must throw a large slice of doubt on anyone from a large family that has been convicted on DNA records and just circumstantial evidence.
Very worrying, given the government's determination to establish a nationwide database. I might have siblings that I don't know about... eeek: No-one is safe.... scared2:
Very very good point. The difference in DNA between siblings, expecially identical twins FFS is negligible.
Post by: Berek on September 19, 2007, 01:22:36 PM
Post by: Nick on September 19, 2007, 01:24:45 PM
Post by: Berek on September 19, 2007, 01:47:51 PM
Post by: MargaRita on September 19, 2007, 04:41:43 PM
How can he have phone access to the PM, how can he have top solicitors and PR people (none of whom seem to want payment) , and how can he have rich benefactors throwing money at him?
Sadly, hundreds of thousands of children go missing worldwide every year. Their parents don't have these contacts or this media coverage.
Post by: Nick on September 19, 2007, 04:43:04 PM
Hello again. Should you publish your e mail address to the world like that? CHange your profile!
Post by: Bar Wench on September 19, 2007, 05:25:12 PM
Post by: Grumpmeister on September 19, 2007, 05:31:02 PM
How can he have phone access to the PM, how can he have top solicitors and PR people (none of whom seem to want payment) , and how can he have rich benefactors throwing money at him?
Because a little bit of free good PR is worth more than 10 advertising campaigns. As for phone access to the PM, PAYG sims are bugger all these days and there are bound to be spare mobile kicking around government departments.
Post by: Berek on September 20, 2007, 07:31:57 AM
Post by: Nick on September 20, 2007, 07:34:46 AM
Post by: Berek on September 20, 2007, 07:47:46 AM
Post by: tel on September 20, 2007, 08:01:58 AM
Should be sorted now. Let me know if it's not as I can see them all anyway as admin.
EEK! redface:
Post by: Bar Wench on September 20, 2007, 08:03:39 AM
Should be sorted now. Let me know if it's not as I can see them all anyway as admin.
EEK! redface:
I am all knowing and all powerful! Bwwahahahahahah
Post by: Barman on September 20, 2007, 08:04:22 AM
No, I am all-knowing... whistle:Should be sorted now. Let me know if it's not as I can see them all anyway as admin.
EEK! redface:
I am all knowing and all powerful! Bwwahahahahahah
Post by: Bar Wench on September 20, 2007, 08:05:45 AM
point:
Post by: Barman on September 20, 2007, 08:08:09 AM
No you're not. Because <sing song voice>I know things that you don't know, you don't know, you don't know.</sing song voice>Betcha don't... whistle:
point:
Post by: Bar Wench on September 20, 2007, 08:08:37 AM
No you're not. Because <sing song voice>I know things that you don't know, you don't know, you don't know.</sing song voice>Betcha don't... whistle:
point:
Betcha I do!
Post by: Barman on September 20, 2007, 08:11:24 AM
Are we talking shopping perchance? whistle:No you're not. Because <sing song voice>I know things that you don't know, you don't know, you don't know.</sing song voice>Betcha don't... whistle:
point:
Betcha I do!
Post by: Bar Wench on September 20, 2007, 08:17:41 AM
Are we talking shopping perchance? whistle:No you're not. Because <sing song voice>I know things that you don't know, you don't know, you don't know.</sing song voice>Betcha don't... whistle:
point:
Betcha I do!
Maybe whistle:
Post by: Nick on September 20, 2007, 08:20:39 AM
Post by: Bar Wench on September 20, 2007, 08:22:11 AM
What is this thread about?
I could split it? lol:
Post by: Nick on September 20, 2007, 08:23:12 AM
[attachment deleted by admin]
Post by: Bar Wench on September 20, 2007, 08:24:14 AM
No, that confuses us.
It's so sad that it is so easy to do. point:
Post by: Barman on September 20, 2007, 08:24:26 AM
noooo:Are we talking shopping perchance? whistle:No you're not. Because <sing song voice>I know things that you don't know, you don't know, you don't know.</sing song voice>Betcha don't... whistle:
point:
Betcha I do!
Maybe whistle:
Post by: Bar Wench on September 20, 2007, 08:29:21 AM
Post by: Nick on September 20, 2007, 08:30:13 AM
[attachment deleted by admin]
Post by: Bar Wench on September 20, 2007, 08:31:59 AM
Post by: Nick on September 20, 2007, 08:32:55 AM
Post by: Bar Wench on September 20, 2007, 08:34:36 AM
Are we back on topic now?
Could be. I really have nothing more to say on the matter. The whole thing is a shambles. They are unfit parents. I feel horribly sorry for the children both Maddy and the twins but I'm afraid I have no sympathy for the shifty McCanns.
Post by: Berek on September 20, 2007, 02:03:53 PM
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tvparty.com%2Fbgifs17%2Fmccann-header.jpg&hash=1f50efa86b154821bac56b83de68ab8c3b41bec3)
Post by: TG on September 20, 2007, 07:06:52 PM
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91210-1285078,00.html
Sky getting a bit desperate maybe.
How long before they take the 'madeline' link from the front page index I wonder.
Post by: Darwins Selection on September 21, 2007, 09:56:41 AM
They are unfit parents. I feel horribly sorry for the children both Maddy and the twins but I'm afraid I have no sympathy for the shifty McCanns.Still quite open minded about it all then?
Post by: Bar Wench on September 21, 2007, 10:03:52 AM
They are unfit parents. I feel horribly sorry for the children both Maddy and the twins but I'm afraid I have no sympathy for the shifty McCanns.Still quite open minded about it all then?
That's my opinion on the whole leaving them in the apartment thing. I can't understand how you would be so desperate to have a child that you go through IVF only to leave them in an apartment alone while you swan off to wine and dine. If it had been a single mum or a chav couple the nation would be baying for blood but because they are nice and middle class we are giving them a free pass.
Post by: Snoopy on September 21, 2007, 10:33:28 AM
Post by: Bar Wench on September 21, 2007, 10:55:29 AM
Agreed ~ don't like the spider avatar though
Not my fault. cussing:
Post by: Snoopy on September 21, 2007, 11:09:26 AM
Agreed ~ don't like the spider avatar though
Not my fault. cussing:
So I discovered.
Post by: Berek on September 21, 2007, 03:03:03 PM
MAKES ME FUCKING PUKE !!!!!
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 21, 2007, 03:06:13 PM
Post by: Berek on September 21, 2007, 03:11:09 PM
You're only upset because they didn't do it.
rubschin: whistle: whistle:
Post by: Darwins Selection on September 21, 2007, 06:01:46 PM
You're only upset because they didn't do it.Agreed.
There is currently no tangible proof that they inflicted any harm on the child.
Post by: Bar Wench on September 21, 2007, 06:06:37 PM
Post by: Darwins Selection on September 21, 2007, 06:09:39 PM
Other than the initial abandonment that led to her be taken.
Allow me to offer you a discounted place on the next "Irony explained for the sweet and Innocent" course at the Tech college.
Post by: Mr Happy on September 21, 2007, 07:23:29 PM
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 21, 2007, 07:31:49 PM
Post by: Mr Happy on September 21, 2007, 07:40:49 PM
The Portugese Police have made enough of a hash of it that they will not be charged, or if the 1% option of abduction is the truth the person will not be found.
An innocent child has suffered at the hands of two horrible 'grown ups', I conclude that the World is a poorer place for it.
Oh and... HANG THE BASTARDS!
Post by: Nick on September 21, 2007, 08:12:14 PM
Hmmm rubschin:
As we said, the McCanns are middle class professionals and left their kids alone while they went out on the piss. They met the effing POPE. WHy?
These two are dodgy.
WHole different story coming out. WHen do they get to see the POPE?
DOes that make sense?
Post by: Mr Happy on September 21, 2007, 08:20:42 PM
DOes that make sense?
Neigh
Post by: Nick on September 21, 2007, 08:22:32 PM
D'ya know wot I mean?
Post by: Mr Happy on September 21, 2007, 08:27:07 PM
I get your spin, young lad from Wigan - who cares?
Bet the parents tax credits are heavily investigated!
Post by: Nick on September 21, 2007, 08:28:09 PM
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 21, 2007, 08:30:40 PM
Young children should never be left unattended, it's that simple.
My ex and and I didn't and I doubt if any on this forum ever did.
Doesn't matter what 'class' you come from.
Post by: Mr Happy on September 21, 2007, 08:34:29 PM
Doesn't matter what 'class' you come from.
No but the perception of it seems to.
Lesson to parents to be; get a qualification, cling on to cuddly toy, go to church. If the unthinkable happens at least you can rake in the millions...
Post by: Uncle Mort on September 21, 2007, 08:40:01 PM
Post by: Mr Happy on September 21, 2007, 08:50:14 PM
The children in the Wigan case are much older, the boy who died was 10. At what age can you leave children alone?
30ish prolly.
That's one of the problems, I was allowed to roam free and came accross old quarry's, a disused factory with working machinery etc. Could have quite easily gone horribly wrong but learnt many a lesson.
Worried about being over protective and my kids issing out on fun and/or becoming reprobates. What to do?
Kids have checked out through many a generation, is it merely filling 24hr news channels that now puts the sh1t up every parent in the country?
Post by: Berek on September 22, 2007, 07:56:28 AM
Post by: Barman on September 22, 2007, 08:30:30 AM
Gerry now claims there was an intruder in the apartment an hour before she went missing, how come he's only saying that now ??Perhaps they were worried that people might think they were not fit to be parents?
You know, find an intruder in the room, don?t bother reporting it then piss off down the pub leaving the room unlocked with your three kids in it?
You can see how people might get the wrong end of the stick. You know what they are like...
Post by: Nick on September 22, 2007, 08:50:02 AM
Post by: Mr Happy on September 22, 2007, 12:00:50 PM
Portugese Police have arranged a line-up:
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdi1.shopping.com%2Fimages%2Fdi%2F56%2F36%2F73%2F58524e73706644724d73305245623478646167-100x100-0-0.jpg&hash=63fee331eff408ada0e4d8fbdad55f73e4fbca96)
Post by: Berek on September 22, 2007, 01:05:37 PM
She was killed by one of Kate's love toys?
Portugese Police have arranged a line-up:
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdi1.shopping.com%2Fimages%2Fdi%2F56%2F36%2F73%2F58524e73706644724d73305245623478646167-100x100-0-0.jpg&hash=63fee331eff408ada0e4d8fbdad55f73e4fbca96)
drumroll: drumroll:
if our Berek jumped on Kate she'd snap in half.. she needs a chicken dinner
Post by: Berek on September 22, 2007, 01:42:59 PM
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91210-1285329,00.html
Post by: Darwins Selection on September 22, 2007, 02:43:11 PM
She was killed by one of Kate's love toys?
Portugese Police have arranged a line-up:
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdi1.shopping.com%2Fimages%2Fdi%2F56%2F36%2F73%2F58524e73706644724d73305245623478646167-100x100-0-0.jpg&hash=63fee331eff408ada0e4d8fbdad55f73e4fbca96)
drumroll: drumroll:
if our Berek jumped on Kate she'd snap in half.. she needs a chicken dinner
I expected you to suggest a Salami sandwich. whistle:
Post by: Sour Puss on September 25, 2007, 09:15:02 PM
http://www.metro.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=67250&in_page_id=34
Second tourist 'saw Maddy in Morocco'
Sunday, September 23, 2007
A second sighting in Morocco of a girl who looked like Madeleine McCann has been revealed.
A tourist from Yorkshire contacted police to notify them of seeing someone who looked similar to Madeleine outside the Ibis Hotel in Marrakech on May 9, it emerged yesterday.
A Norwegian tourist had already claimed to have seen a child like four-year-old Madeleine at a petrol station in the city on that day.
The Briton was unaware of this first sighting, meaning police now have two independent reports from the same place.
Details of the second sighting were passed on to the Portuguese and Moroccan authorities, and parents Kate and Gerry McCann, but not disclosed to the media until now.
Yesterday, the McCanns' spokesman Clarence Mitchell said: 'It was made known to us when it happened.
'All I can say is that any possible sightings, if credible, we hope would be examined thoroughly, whether it's in Portugal, Spain or anywhere else.'
Madeleine disappeared from the Praia da Luz resort in the Algarve on May 3.
Yesterday, the McCanns, both 39, left their home in Rothley, Leicestershire, with twins Sean and Amelie to go to church, where prayers are said daily for their daughter. Mr Mitchell said: 'They are feeling positive.'
Post by: Snoopy on September 26, 2007, 08:40:39 AM
http://www.independent.ie/world-news/europe/police-taking-photograph-of-maddy-in-morocco-seriously-1088750.html
Post by: Nick on September 26, 2007, 08:43:16 AM
Post by: Berek on September 26, 2007, 09:57:02 AM
we all know she was eaten by the one eyed monster
Post by: Snoopy on September 26, 2007, 10:02:30 AM
I dont think the kid in the picture is her, firstly she/he/it is no fairer skinned than the woman in black to her right. Since Maddie went missing iv'e seen her everywhere, take a group of 4 year old girls and you are sure to find one that bears a resemblance.
we all know she was eaten by the one eyed monster
Gordon Brown ate the kid??????????? eeek:
Post by: Nick on September 26, 2007, 10:07:07 AM
Post by: Darwins Selection on September 26, 2007, 12:53:33 PM
A definite possibility. Actually, I don't like to think about him eating. I bet he is fast and messy. sick2:Deep-fried Mars bars are not easy to eat tidily.
Post by: Nick on September 26, 2007, 01:27:10 PM
Post by: Berek on September 26, 2007, 01:55:07 PM
I reckon we'll have loads of these photos cropping up, just like the big cats and the loch ness monster
Post by: Nick on September 26, 2007, 01:56:32 PM
Post by: Bar Wench on September 26, 2007, 01:59:00 PM
Post by: Nick on September 26, 2007, 02:01:20 PM
Wimmin! noooo:
Post by: Bar Wench on September 26, 2007, 02:02:04 PM
No, digital. They just took three weeks to download them.
Wimmin! noooo:
Well download them. They are interchangable in my head these days.
Post by: Berek on September 26, 2007, 02:15:31 PM
They were Norwegian.
I thought they were Spanish.. rubschin:
Post by: Bar Wench on September 26, 2007, 02:17:31 PM
They were Norwegian.
I thought they were Spanish.. rubschin:
I think they were too.
Post by: Snoopy on September 26, 2007, 02:20:06 PM
Quote
INTERPOL is taking seriously a photograph which, it is claimed, shows Madeleine McCann in Morocco, it emerged last night.
The image was taken by a Spanish couple while they were on holiday at the end of August. It shows a fair-haired girl accompanied by a number of Moroccan adults.
On returning home to Albacete in south-east Spain, the couple passed the picture to Spanish police. Jose Herrero Arcas, a government official, said the photograph had then been handed to Interpol.
"The quality of the photograph is not very clear, and it was taken from around 200 metres away.
"However, the National Police are taking the claim seriously enough to have sent it on to their colleagues at Interpol,'' he said.
Post by: TG on September 26, 2007, 02:52:48 PM
Mind you, that will probably change in the next 5 minutes so I wont bother with a link.
Post by: Berek on September 26, 2007, 02:57:19 PM
Photo not Maddie according to latest Sky news.
Mind you, that will probably change in the next 5 minutes so I wont bother with a link.
I bet Kay Burely is on her way there as well.. point:
Post by: Barman on September 26, 2007, 02:57:53 PM
Madeleine went missing on May 3 while her family were on holiday in Portugal triggering an international search and a high-profile campaign.
FFS I think the entire universe knows that by now... noooo:
Post by: TG on September 26, 2007, 03:01:02 PM
Why does every story end with: -
Madeleine went missing on May 3 while her family were on holiday in Portugal triggering an international search and a high-profile campaign.
FFS I think the entire universe knows that by now... noooo:
Yes. But the world keeps going off topic and forgetting.
Post by: Barman on September 26, 2007, 03:02:42 PM
lol:Why does every story end with: -
Madeleine went missing on May 3 while her family were on holiday in Portugal triggering an international search and a high-profile campaign.
FFS I think the entire universe knows that by now... noooo:
Yes. But the world keeps going off topic and forgetting.
Post by: Mr Happy on September 26, 2007, 03:03:16 PM
Post by: Berek on September 26, 2007, 03:04:26 PM
Big black prostitute - Chelsea fan - got a tattoo of John Terry and Frank Lampard on the inside of her thighs. She says to her punter "if you can guess who they are you get a free shag". He looks to the left and then to the right and says "I dunno who those ugly bastards are but the one in the middle with the fat lips and curly hair is Shaun Wright-Philips!
Post by: Barman on September 26, 2007, 03:07:20 PM
just to go off topic for a minute..Have you been slurping your patient?s medication today Berek? rubschin:
Big black prostitute - Chelsea fan - got a tattoo of John Terry and Frank Lampard on the inside of her thighs. She says to her punter "if you can guess who they are you get a free shag". He looks to the left and then to the right and says "I dunno who those ugly bastards are but the one in the middle with the fat lips and curly hair is Shaun Wright-Philips!
Post by: Berek on September 26, 2007, 03:12:05 PM
Post by: Berek on September 26, 2007, 03:20:59 PM
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.dailymail.co.uk%2Fi%2Fpix%2F2007%2F09_04%2FNoMadByelineES_468x590.jpg&hash=ddd693a4b82aef677636e56bd5339968488f3416)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=484083&in_page_id=1770&ct=5
Post by: Barman on September 26, 2007, 03:22:46 PM
Post by: Nick on September 26, 2007, 04:00:41 PM
Quote
Madeleine went missing on May 3 while her family were on holiday in Portugal triggering an international search and a high-profile campaign.
First I've heard of it!
What is this thread about?
Post by: Berek on September 26, 2007, 06:13:28 PM
QuoteMadeleine went missing on May 3 while her family were on holiday in Portugal triggering an international search and a high-profile campaign.
First I've heard of it!
What is this thread about?
bananas whistle:
Post by: Nick on September 26, 2007, 09:02:42 PM
Quote
Bushra's father is just a farmer so he would not have read the newspapers
Obviously. Like DS then
Post by: Berek on September 27, 2007, 07:07:27 AM
Post by: Barman on September 27, 2007, 07:16:23 AM
apparently they have already spent ?300,000 of the ?1 million in the fund.On bananas? rubschin:
Post by: Berek on September 27, 2007, 07:18:49 AM
Post by: Barman on September 27, 2007, 07:19:32 AM
Kate wanted one of those banana shaped dildos.. whistle:And...?
Post by: Darwins Selection on September 27, 2007, 07:23:52 AM
apparently they have already spent ?300,000 of the ?1 million in the fund.Blimey!
That's half a logo!
Post by: Darwins Selection on September 27, 2007, 07:25:08 AM
QuoteBushra's father is just a farmer so he would not have read the newspapers
Obviously. Like DS then
Shows all you know.
We get papers out here all the time, I was reading only yesterday about the death of Winston Churchill.
Very sad.
Post by: Barman on September 27, 2007, 07:53:10 AM
Winston Churchill is dead? eeek:QuoteBushra's father is just a farmer so he would not have read the newspapers
Obviously. Like DS then
Shows all you know.
We get papers out here all the time, I was reading only yesterday about the death of Winston Churchill.
Very sad.
Post by: Nick on September 27, 2007, 08:32:39 AM
Post by: Berek on September 27, 2007, 08:52:29 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v69yX3qZUZQ
Post by: Berek on September 28, 2007, 04:21:41 PM
Post by: Barman on September 28, 2007, 04:22:20 PM
Glancing at a paper at work today I saw that a Chilean production company are to make a t.v. series about Maddies diappearance.. whistle:doh:
Post by: Berek on September 28, 2007, 04:24:47 PM
Post by: Berek on September 28, 2007, 04:25:25 PM
Post by: Misunderstood on October 01, 2007, 05:06:53 PM
Post by: GROWLER on October 01, 2007, 05:55:39 PM
I said something here yesterday - but I can't remember what. noooo:
I wrote a lot yesterday- and CAN remember what it was, but I'm not re-writing it. noooo:
Post by: Snoopy on October 01, 2007, 05:57:19 PM
I said something here yesterday - but I can't remember what. noooo:
I wrote a lot yesterday- and CAN remember what it was, but I'm not re-writing it. noooo:
rubschin: Best not.
Post by: Nick on October 01, 2007, 08:19:23 PM
Post by: Berek on October 02, 2007, 06:10:01 PM
Post by: TG on October 02, 2007, 07:26:31 PM
.. the McCanns will get off..
Berek. Just for the record (before some eastern european wanksplat deletes it) do you beleive the McCanns killed their daughter or not?
Forget leaving them unattended, did they KILL her?
Post by: Nick on October 02, 2007, 08:09:48 PM
I don't go to doctors. They make you ill!
Post by: Bar Wench on October 02, 2007, 08:24:29 PM
.. the McCanns will get off..
Berek. Just for the record (before some eastern european wanksplat deletes it) do you beleive the McCanns killed their daughter or not?
Forget leaving them unattended, did they KILL her?
I'll answer. I don't know. I'm leaning towards yes they did though. Not on purpose but as a horrible accident.
Post by: TG on October 02, 2007, 08:33:35 PM
.. the McCanns will get off..
Berek. Just for the record (before some eastern european wanksplat deletes it) do you beleive the McCanns killed their daughter or not?
Forget leaving them unattended, did they KILL her?
I'll answer. I don't know. I'm leaning towards yes they did though. Not on purpose but as a horrible accident.
No disrespect but that is no answer. A horrible accident could include running under a bus. Let's open it it up and make it clear.
Leaving aside the obvious fact of leaving her unattended who beleives they killed their daughter and are covering it up?
Post by: Misunderstood on October 02, 2007, 09:29:23 PM
Trouble is, the same lack of evidence does not exonerate them either.
My personal feelings lie against accusation of the McCanns - at least for now, it's unsustainable.
Post by: Mr Happy on October 02, 2007, 10:30:46 PM
I don't think suggesting it is an accident is no answer.
It could have been sleeping pills, a trip, whatever. The parents didn't admit the 'accident' straight away as they feared the other kids would be taken away.
Spell check, wtf mi spuling is grate!
Post by: Misunderstood on October 03, 2007, 08:18:24 AM
Tail, i think it's indisputable that their lack of care caused her death.
I don't think suggesting it is an accident is no answer.
It could have been sleeping pills, a trip, whatever. The parents didn't admit the 'accident' straight away as they feared the other kids would be taken away.
Spell check, wtf mi spuling is grate!
I was 'leaving aside the obvious lack of care'. Anyway, I accept that the lack of care caused the INCIDENT but not her death. That is still an open question.
Post by: Bar Wench on October 03, 2007, 08:31:22 AM
Tail, i think it's indisputable that their lack of care caused her death.
I don't think suggesting it is an accident is no answer.
It could have been sleeping pills, a trip, whatever. The parents didn't admit the 'accident' straight away as they feared the other kids would be taken away.
Spell check, wtf mi spuling is grate!
Exactly!
I believe there was an accidental over dose of sleeping pills. Or they "sedated" her and she tripped and fell. She died and they have covered it up.
I don't believe that they set out to kill her.
At the very least I think they should be charged with aiding and abeting or as an accessory. If they hadn't left them it wouldn't have happened. I simply can't get past that.
Post by: Barman on October 03, 2007, 08:44:42 AM
However, I think what made most of us suspicious was their attitude when initially interviewed – they weren’t quite ‘right’ for some reason – many, many people said it.
Post by: Uncle Mort on October 03, 2007, 08:45:22 AM
Post by: Bar Wench on October 03, 2007, 08:51:44 AM
There is clearly no evidence that they were involved in her disappearance apart from the obvious neglect.
However, I think what made most of us suspicious was their attitude when initially interviewed – they weren’t quite ‘right’ for some reason – many, many people said it.
No evidence what so ever. Freely admit it. It's just what I believe. I've also had to stop reading/watching it. I threw stuff at the tv the whole thing was making me so cross.
I also believe the police were negligent. Clearly not doing their job. The fact that the parents weren't considered suspects at the very beginning did not smack of a professional investigation. Even if I didn't believe they were involved I would think that. Surely they should have been investigated so they could be properly eliminated.
Post by: Nick on October 03, 2007, 08:52:31 AM
Post by: Barman on October 03, 2007, 08:55:41 AM
Has anyone considered that she was abducted by aliens?I suspect someone has… whistle:
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freesmileys.org%2Femo%2Falien006.gif&hash=2bd9296644ccd1da65310192141048211a2acd20) (http://www.freesmileys.org)
Post by: Misunderstood on October 03, 2007, 09:03:50 AM
Post by: Snoopy on October 03, 2007, 10:48:12 AM
Parents were of course negligent.
Post by: Nick on October 03, 2007, 10:50:19 AM
Post by: Snoopy on October 03, 2007, 10:51:24 AM
As they well know. As I have said before, I never let The Boy out of my sight (except when at school) . We have a rather nice restaurant (well three actually) close to our house. ONe is 50 yards away. We would NEVER go out to one and leave him alone (asleep or awake). What were they thinking of?
Dunno ~ we haven't been out together ~ without the children ~ in 14 years
Post by: Nick on October 03, 2007, 10:52:05 AM
Post by: GROWLER on October 03, 2007, 10:54:56 AM
Only cus they'd kill each other. eveilgrin:
Does this extreme brother/sister hatred thing EVER get any better?
The only thing I've found to stop them fighting, is for me to start a rant between me and Mrs GROWLER. Werks EVERY time. happy088
Post by: Snoopy on October 03, 2007, 10:57:46 AM
Wouldn't leave ours alone either.
Only cus they'd kill each other. eveilgrin:
Does this extreme brother/sister hatred thing EVER get any better?
My elder two Boy (39) girl (37) have not spoken for ten years.................. so the answer would seem to be NO!
Post by: GROWLER on October 03, 2007, 10:59:19 AM
Wouldn't leave ours alone either.
Only cus they'd kill each other. eveilgrin:
Does this extreme brother/sister hatred thing EVER get any better?
My elder two Boy (39) girl (37) have not spoken for ten years.................. so the answer would seem to be NO!
GROWLER jnr. has stated that he NEVER wants to see his little sister EVER again after he or she has left home.
I find that sad tbh. sad32:
Post by: Nick on October 03, 2007, 11:00:29 AM
Mind you, I am 53 and my 60 year old (sacked) sister is off my list!
Post by: Snoopy on October 03, 2007, 11:19:34 AM
It was not always that way when we were kids.
Post by: Nick on October 03, 2007, 11:22:42 AM
He replied, "Yes, but not Paul!!!"
Fair enough. The Paul in question appears to me to be at least three quarters chimpanzee, so I can see the problem. He even has those curved feet eeek:
Post by: The Moan Ranger on October 03, 2007, 02:50:16 PM
Well, they are doctors!
I don't go to doctors. They make you ill!
All doctors are bastards too cussing:
Post by: Berek on October 10, 2007, 04:54:10 PM
they are still managing a run though :
"On Saturday we decided to go for a run but drove nearby and parked the car but we were ‘snapped’ at the end, when I was certainly looking wearier than Kate!"
http://www.findmadeleine.com/
Post by: Barman on October 10, 2007, 04:56:18 PM
I was looking at the siteWhy? shrugs:
Post by: Berek on October 10, 2007, 08:23:59 PM
I was looking at the siteWhy? shrugs:
tut tut.. beause I still wonder whats happened to her.. whistle:
Post by: Snoopy on October 10, 2007, 08:27:08 PM
Post by: Berek on October 11, 2007, 01:50:03 PM
eat more broccolli son...
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91210-1288014,00.html
Post by: Nick on October 11, 2007, 01:51:56 PM
Post by: Berek on October 11, 2007, 01:54:45 PM
I got dragged to some fertility clinic years ago. I thought it was for Mrs Nick. I got a bag with some pron mags, a "receptacle" and other stuff. It was a hot day. Cost me a fortune
HEH HEH HEH.. point:
Post by: Nick on October 11, 2007, 01:56:10 PM
Sorry girls, but it's true. For that I would have expected help from a nurse!
Post by: Barman on October 11, 2007, 01:57:13 PM
£400 for a wank!I think you’ll find it was a brothel Nick… point:
Sorry girls, but it's true. For that I would have expected help from a nurse!
Post by: Nick on October 11, 2007, 01:57:50 PM
Post by: Berek on October 11, 2007, 01:58:00 PM
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kissmestace.com%2Fwp-content%2Fhalloweencostume_xtina_nurse_06.jpg&hash=862f7d48702cefe691d8b39fe6598b71de866e04)
Post by: Snoopy on October 11, 2007, 01:58:27 PM
Post by: Nick on October 11, 2007, 01:59:09 PM
Thanks. I defer to your greater experience
Post by: Berek on October 11, 2007, 01:59:51 PM
Post by: Nick on October 11, 2007, 02:00:29 PM
Post by: Barman on October 11, 2007, 02:01:13 PM
Odd that you mention that...................... noooo:What? rubschin:
Post by: Nick on October 11, 2007, 02:01:37 PM
Post by: Snoopy on October 11, 2007, 02:01:56 PM
I went National Health ... they said "Do it at home and bring it into the path lab within half an hour ~ oh and it is useless if contaminated with saliva" eeek:
Post by: Nick on October 11, 2007, 02:02:48 PM
Oh, I see. They actually say that stuff.
Blimey.
Post by: Snoopy on October 11, 2007, 02:03:42 PM
Post by: The Moan Ranger on October 11, 2007, 02:07:45 PM
Should have gone with BUPA ~ they provide a nurse to help (male if you ask for one)
A "helping hand" as it were?
Post by: Snoopy on October 11, 2007, 02:10:11 PM
Should have gone with BUPA ~ they provide a nurse to help (male if you ask for one)
A "helping hand" as it were?
Allegedly
Post by: Darwins Selection on October 11, 2007, 03:30:26 PM
Shook me at the time as well.
That should avoid contamination.
Post by: Snoopy on October 11, 2007, 03:35:07 PM
The next time I arrived with a sample they said ..... "When did you produce this?" I replied "'bout five minutes ago in your car park". The look on the receptionist's face was worth it. lol: lol:
Post by: Barman on October 11, 2007, 03:38:21 PM
Didn't actually ~ they said I took too long to get it to the path lab so it was useless .... would I do it again?lol: lol: lol:
The next time I arrived with a sample they said ..... "When did you produce this?" I replied "'bout five minutes ago in your car park". The look on the receptionist's face was worth it. lol: lol:
Post by: Darwins Selection on October 11, 2007, 03:45:27 PM
Didn't actually ~ they said I took too long to get it to the path lab so it was useless .... would I do it again?happy001 happy001 happy001
The next time I arrived with a sample they said ..... "When did you produce this?" I replied "'bout five minutes ago in your car park". The look on the receptionist's face was worth it. lol: lol:
Have the clap.
Post by: Snoopy on October 11, 2007, 03:51:38 PM
Post by: Berek on October 18, 2007, 07:26:35 AM
Post by: Barman on October 18, 2007, 07:28:50 AM
Post by: Darwins Selection on October 18, 2007, 08:40:36 AM
There was a brief report on the radio yesterday that tests proved a body had been in the hire car… didn’t hear any more about it after that.Bit hard to drive any car with your body on the outside.
Post by: Barman on October 18, 2007, 08:45:37 AM
Post by: Darwins Selection on October 18, 2007, 08:53:50 AM
Whatever 'evidence' they have to confirm a dead body was in the car would also yield DNA.
Probably some local taking a bit of roadkill home for supper.
Post by: Barman on October 18, 2007, 08:54:56 AM
Post by: Bar Wench on October 18, 2007, 08:55:53 AM
Post by: Marley's Ghost (Imbiber of Spirits) on October 18, 2007, 08:57:51 AM
Then really what was the point of mentioning it. Banghead
Perhaps to keep alive the longest thread to date? At least the highest number of pages is marginally more interesting than 'quote-a-thons'.
Post by: Barman on October 18, 2007, 08:58:03 AM
Then really what was the point of mentioning it. BangheadI wish I hadn't now... noooo:
Pardon me for making an on-topic comment eh? Banghead
Post by: Snoopy on October 18, 2007, 08:58:31 AM
Post by: Barman on October 18, 2007, 08:58:55 AM
What Ghostie said... happy088Then really what was the point of mentioning it. Banghead
Perhaps to keep alive the longest thread to date? At least the highest number of pages is marginally more interesting than 'quote-a-thons'.
Post by: Marley's Ghost (Imbiber of Spirits) on October 18, 2007, 09:00:46 AM
What Ghostie said... happy088Then really what was the point of mentioning it. Banghead
Perhaps to keep alive the longest thread to date? At least the highest number of pages is marginally more interesting than 'quote-a-thons'.
Well, for REAL excitement, we could always combine the two?? whistle:
Post by: Snoopy on October 18, 2007, 09:02:54 AM
What Ghostie said... happy088Then really what was the point of mentioning it. Banghead
Perhaps to keep alive the longest thread to date? At least the highest number of pages is marginally more interesting than 'quote-a-thons'.
Well, for REAL excitement, we could always combine the two?? whistle:
sleep017
Post by: TG on October 18, 2007, 09:03:29 AM
What Ghostie said... happy088Then really what was the point of mentioning it. Banghead
Perhaps to keep alive the longest thread to date? At least the highest number of pages is marginally more interesting than 'quote-a-thons'.
Well, for REAL excitement, we could always combine the two?? whistle:
Nah. noooo:
Post by: Barman on October 18, 2007, 09:05:08 AM
BumpDid you bang your head? happy100
Post by: Snoopy on October 18, 2007, 09:08:47 AM
BumpDid you bang your head? happy100
Fell over in my excitement. ::)
Post by: Bar Wench on October 18, 2007, 09:11:50 AM
Post by: Darwins Selection on October 18, 2007, 09:45:44 AM
I do that a lot. noooo:Banging?
Post by: Bar Wench on October 18, 2007, 09:46:44 AM
I bruise like a peach.
Post by: Snoopy on October 18, 2007, 09:47:29 AM
Post by: Darwins Selection on October 18, 2007, 09:48:00 AM
Combine three and have the "Bereks Haway and lose yer little girl at the weekend" quote-a-thon?What Ghostie said... happy088Then really what was the point of mentioning it. Banghead
Perhaps to keep alive the longest thread to date? At least the highest number of pages is marginally more interesting than 'quote-a-thons'.
Well, for REAL excitement, we could always combine the two?? whistle:
Post by: TG on October 18, 2007, 09:53:18 AM
It turned out to be my fault because I should have opened them.
Now then, what were we discussing..? rubschin:
Post by: Berek on October 18, 2007, 09:57:15 AM
While we are a million miles off topic, Mrs TG opened the curtains yesterday morning and they fell down, track and all.
It turned out to be my fault because I should have opened them.
Now then, what were we discussing..? rubschin:
will she be adding " repair curtain rail " to your 2008 "to do" list ?
Post by: Snoopy on October 18, 2007, 09:59:40 AM
While we are a million miles off topic, Mrs TG opened the curtains yesterday morning and they fell down, track and all.
It turned out to be my fault because I should have opened them.
Now then, what were we discussing..? rubschin:
You're male, you're breathing, you're in the same house ...... Of course it's your fault, what did you expect.
Post by: TG on October 18, 2007, 10:00:15 AM
While we are a million miles off topic, Mrs TG opened the curtains yesterday morning and they fell down, track and all.
It turned out to be my fault because I should have opened them.
Now then, what were we discussing..? rubschin:
will she be adding " repair curtain rail " to your 2008 "to do" list ?
Probably just after 'install new double glazing'
Post by: TG on October 18, 2007, 10:01:11 AM
While we are a million miles off topic, Mrs TG opened the curtains yesterday morning and they fell down, track and all.
It turned out to be my fault because I should have opened them.
Now then, what were we discussing..? rubschin:
You're male, you're breathing, you're in the same house ...... Of course it's your fault, what did you expect.
I know what you mean but I wasnt even in the house! surrender:
Post by: Snoopy on October 18, 2007, 10:05:25 AM
Post by: Bar Wench on October 18, 2007, 10:08:45 AM
While we are a million miles off topic, Mrs TG opened the curtains yesterday morning and they fell down, track and all.
It turned out to be my fault because I should have opened them.
Now then, what were we discussing..? rubschin:
You're male, you're breathing, you're in the same house ...... Of course it's your fault, what did you expect.
I know what you mean but I wasnt even in the house! surrender:
Why didn't you open them before you left then? eeek:
Post by: Snoopy on October 18, 2007, 10:10:36 AM
Post by: TG on October 18, 2007, 10:12:40 AM
While we are a million miles off topic, Mrs TG opened the curtains yesterday morning and they fell down, track and all.
It turned out to be my fault because I should have opened them.
Now then, what were we discussing..? rubschin:
You're male, you're breathing, you're in the same house ...... Of course it's your fault, what did you expect.
I know what you mean but I wasnt even in the house! surrender:
Why didn't you open them before you left then? eeek:
Cos' it was dark. Banghead
Post by: Miss Demeanour on October 18, 2007, 11:52:24 AM
Cos' it was dark. Banghead
Of course it was your fault - you should have got blinds instead noooo:
Post by: TG on October 18, 2007, 03:08:21 PM
Cos' it was dark. Banghead
Of course it was your fault - you should have got blinds instead noooo:
Bugger this. I'm going back on topic. Any new developments?
Oh yes. Some award winning novelist bint is talking bollocks....erm...
Hang about, If i'd got blinds and they collapsed when she opened them (which is likely) it would still have been my fault even if i had been on the moon at the time, so what difference would blinds make to the blame game? Eh? Eh?
Post by: Berek on October 18, 2007, 03:44:29 PM
Post by: Misunderstood on October 18, 2007, 11:42:27 PM
You don't have to be present.
In fact, you don't even have to be alive.
Just 'male' is enough.
Now, what was this thread about?
Post by: Uncle Mort on October 19, 2007, 09:10:18 AM
Having watched 'Dispatches' (channel 4 last night) I'm even more sure it was abduction. Also having now seen more details of the apartment and where the bar/restaurant the McCanns were at that evening I cannot understand how they could have even considered leaving the children unattended.
Post by: Landlady on October 19, 2007, 11:17:53 AM
I cannot understand how they could have even considered leaving the children unattended.
That's the nub of the matter I think and neither can I noooo:
Post by: MargaRita on October 19, 2007, 05:02:01 PM
She's being criticised because she looks too careless to be a mum. confused:
Post by: Snoopy on October 19, 2007, 05:06:39 PM
Post by: Mr Happy on October 19, 2007, 09:52:04 PM
I'm awaiting the book, Kate & Gerry's Guide To Parenting.
Post by: Mr Happy on October 19, 2007, 09:57:12 PM
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.dailymail.co.uk%2Fi%2Fpix%2F2007%2F05_01%2FKateMcCannAP_468x300.jpg&hash=5780ca8f1ac057e67d6e0996dffd2f89b5038c87)
JUMP!
Post by: Barman on October 20, 2007, 04:53:23 AM
HEADLINE: Portuguese Police discover photographic evidence from the very moment that poor Maddie went missing.
KATE: “88 – 89 – 100 – coming ready or not!”
Post by: Berek on October 20, 2007, 10:29:56 AM
Post by: Darwins Selection on October 20, 2007, 11:14:28 AM
“88 – 89 – 100”doh:
When are the pub accounts due for audit? cool14:
Post by: Snoopy on October 20, 2007, 11:18:51 AM
Post by: Barman on October 20, 2007, 02:38:21 PM
Post by: Misunderstood on October 21, 2007, 10:59:00 AM
how she can think she's gorgeous is beyond me, she's like a plucked chicken..
Don't recall her using 'gorgeous', 'slim' and 'non-maternal' were the words I heard.
Post by: Snoopy on October 21, 2007, 02:09:51 PM
Post by: Bar Wench on October 22, 2007, 07:39:24 AM
how she can think she's gorgeous is beyond me, she's like a plucked chicken..
Don't recall her using 'gorgeous', 'slim' and 'non-maternal' were the words I heard.
Why a non-maternal person would bother with IVF is beyond me. ::)
Post by: Darwins Selection on October 22, 2007, 07:57:42 AM
Smokescreen, obviously. ::)how she can think she's gorgeous is beyond me, she's like a plucked chicken..
Don't recall her using 'gorgeous', 'slim' and 'non-maternal' were the words I heard.
Why a non-maternal person would bother with IVF is beyond me. ::)
Post by: Misunderstood on October 22, 2007, 04:16:03 PM
how she can think she's gorgeous is beyond me, she's like a plucked chicken..
Don't recall her using 'gorgeous', 'slim' and 'non-maternal' were the words I heard.
Why a non-maternal person would bother with IVF is beyond me. ::)
Might be that the 'non-maternal 'look' is only skin deep
Post by: Berek on October 23, 2007, 02:53:35 PM
Post by: Uncle Mort on October 23, 2007, 03:04:08 PM
Post by: Darwins Selection on October 23, 2007, 03:42:53 PM
I see from one paper today that Kate wants to start working in child care ! eeek:Might have trouble getting a good reference.
Post by: Snoopy on October 23, 2007, 04:46:58 PM
I see from one paper today that Kate wants to start working in child care ! eeek:
Daily Mail says so ~ but then ~ They would, wouldn't they.
Post by: Berek on October 23, 2007, 05:05:40 PM
I see from one paper today that Kate wants to start working in child care ! eeek:
Daily Mail says so ~ but then ~ They would, wouldn't they.
they, being the Daily Mail, also reckon she's going to rid the world of cancer, but then it will come back again, and then they'll find another cure, and then it will come back again, and then Richard Littledick will write a witty story about it that will be found in Bargain Books for £1 along with his other shite
Post by: Barman on October 23, 2007, 05:07:28 PM
I see from one paper today that Kate wants to start working in child care ! eeek:Somebody else said today that she’d be able to look after your kids and go out on the piss with you at the same time!
drumroll:
Post by: Berek on October 24, 2007, 01:51:30 PM
Waiter Jose Baptista, 45, told how the staff were amazed by the calm demeanour of Gerry McCann and his wife Kate in the agonising days after Madeleine disappeared. "
http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/22952
Post by: Uncle Mort on October 24, 2007, 02:02:02 PM
Post by: Berek on October 24, 2007, 02:04:39 PM
More shit stirring from a crap paper (pardon my French)
rubschin:
at least it kept frigging Diana off the front page
which reminds me, whatever happened to Will Carling ?
Post by: Berek on October 24, 2007, 02:08:39 PM
Post by: Berek on October 24, 2007, 02:11:13 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0wCsXBj_pU
Post by: Barman on October 24, 2007, 02:12:16 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZGMHShn0ZE;D
Quote
You are sick, sick, sick. I can't believe people can be so cowardly as to put together this kind of montage. Don't you realise they have two children who deserve some kind of normality? I can't believe how creepy you are. I notice you don't even have the courage to use your own face as an avatar, just Kate McCann's...you need help.
Post by: Mr Happy on October 24, 2007, 10:04:34 PM
Kate McCann says she believes that Maddie is still alive as nobody would harm anyone so beautiful, not physically she backtracked, but a beautiful person.
Is this a Hoddlesque karma thing you're suggesting young Kate, murdered children are inwardly ugly and deserving.
Popey concur with your views?
noooo:
Post by: Darwins Selection on October 25, 2007, 07:37:28 AM
Why don't we just get on and burn the parents at the stake and give the other children to a nunnery?
Problem solved.
If it turns out that some creep did abduct the girl after all, we can all say sorry and their pal the Pope can sanctify them.
Post by: Uncle Mort on October 25, 2007, 07:45:12 AM
Post by: TG on October 25, 2007, 07:48:05 AM
Totally agree, where's the baying mob when you want one? ::)
Wattching Eastenders.
Post by: Darwins Selection on October 25, 2007, 07:48:27 AM
Totally agree, where's the baying mob when you want one? ::)Which reminds me, time to put linseed oil on the Ducking Stool before Winter sets in.
Post by: Barman on October 25, 2007, 03:16:29 PM
Totally agree, where's the baying mob when you want one? ::)Thirded! happy088
Post by: TG on October 26, 2007, 08:46:46 AM
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.postimage.org%2FaVRTh3i.jpg&hash=cd9a8178e39759fc2c5c9e2c869246338ee4ac64) (http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=aVRTh3i)
Looks like that bloke at our B&Q to me. Always struck me as a bit dodgy. rubschin:
Post by: Darwins Selection on October 26, 2007, 09:29:19 AM
Result immenent! We have a picture!
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.postimage.org%2FaVRTh3i.jpg&hash=cd9a8178e39759fc2c5c9e2c869246338ee4ac64) (http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=aVRTh3i)
Looks like that bloke at our B&Q to me. Always struck me as a bit dodgy. rubschin:
That's not Maddy, he's nicking one of my turkeys! evil:
Why does he have no face? Is he a Civil Servant?
Post by: Barman on October 26, 2007, 11:45:12 AM
Result immenent! We have a picture!Is that some bizarre ‘identikit’ of what they say happened… for the hard of understanding like? rubschin:
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.postimage.org%2FaVRTh3i.jpg&hash=cd9a8178e39759fc2c5c9e2c869246338ee4ac64) (http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=aVRTh3i)
Looks like that bloke at our B&Q to me. Always struck me as a bit dodgy. rubschin:
Post by: Berek on October 26, 2007, 05:00:25 PM
Anyway, I see the publicity stunt backfired in Spain, after watching their interview 70% said they thought they were lying
Post by: Barman on October 26, 2007, 05:03:38 PM
And the ‘witness’ was also at the tapas bar? surrender:
Post by: Berek on October 26, 2007, 05:04:45 PM
Post by: Barman on October 26, 2007, 05:08:00 PM
having helped consume the 12 bottles of wine ?Indeed…
“It wash a man wearing, um shoes, yesh, shoes and um… carrying poor Maddie… yes carrying her… I luv you… you’re my besh fren’ you are…”
Post by: Mr Happy on October 27, 2007, 07:58:31 PM
The red wine stain on Kate's top didn't arouse suspicion as she had been drinking lager all night. At 11.10 I saw a man with shoes and a head carrying a girl that looked like Maddie. I'd have said something, but there was no need as Maddie had already been killed by her parents, oooops...'
Post by: Nick on October 27, 2007, 09:04:52 PM
Coverage in SPain is huge. Everyone we met there is convinced, and so am I
Post by: Misunderstood on October 27, 2007, 09:28:04 PM
It was Kate. She deffo did it.
Coverage in SPain is huge. Everyone we met there is convinced, and so am I
Which part of the 'evidence' convinced you?
Post by: Shy Talk on October 27, 2007, 09:28:59 PM
Post by: Mr Happy on October 29, 2007, 08:54:00 PM
So far they've proved that it was definitely a man or woman of Moroccan or non-Moroccan appearance, kidnapping Maddie in an 8 minute window, probably for a paedo ring.
In summary, according to Kate and Gerry's detectives, it was somebody other than Kate & Gerry...
Post by: Nick on October 29, 2007, 09:13:17 PM
Post by: GROWLER on October 30, 2007, 08:56:13 AM
They'll no doubt have some 'relevant' excuse for this latest outrage.
Post by: Uncle Mort on October 30, 2007, 09:18:28 AM
Post by: Nick on October 30, 2007, 09:25:08 AM
Post by: GROWLER on October 30, 2007, 09:31:51 AM
Not exactly the most sensible decision they made but still streets behind "the children will be fine on their own"
True, but all this stuff is doing their cause more and more damage.
If they're looking for any form of sympathy and understanding they are certainly proving how NOT to go about it.
They must be nearing the status of being the most despised couple in the country now. evil:
Post by: Barman on October 30, 2007, 11:34:38 AM
Not exactly the most sensible decision they made but still streets behind "the children will be fine on their own";D
Post by: TG on October 30, 2007, 11:55:39 AM
I see Ricky and Bianca are coming back to Eastenders so the 'Where's Madeline' drama will soon slip over the horizon.
Post by: Misunderstood on October 30, 2007, 12:04:09 PM
Common sense, facts, humanity, justice and compassion all get rolled up into a frenzy of extracting the last millilitre of coverage out of it.
The structure of the whole issue gets to be so convoluted and surreal that no one has a clue where truth ends and copy selling gimmickry starts.
As far as I can see, there is not one single shred of any kind of evidence whatsoever here and yet people are convinced utterly of their guilt/innocence and are willing to dispense justice on the spot to them.
The media is the ultimate kangaroo court in forming peoples opinions for them, it is about time that media reporting of incidents of this kind was restricted to simply the truth.
Just suppose that they were charged and put on trial, they would be unlikely to face an unbiased jury anywhere in the world and that cannot be right, whether we realise it or not, the media is committed to providing what we want, in the early stages it was seeking the safe return of the child.
Now the mood has changed, the emphasis has shifted to tittle-tattle gossiping to keep the corpse of a story alive and shifting copy. The well-being of the child is not a story any more so there is only one area left to exploit.
Personally, I don't have a clue, and I'll leave it that way until I hear evidence given under oath in court.
Post by: Bar Wench on October 30, 2007, 12:07:24 PM
Post by: Nick on October 30, 2007, 12:09:11 PM
WTF is that about? There are 5000 here at any one time waiting for adoption!!
Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr Banghead Angry9: Angry9: Angry9:
Post by: Misunderstood on October 30, 2007, 12:12:52 PM
And, I recall, that plonker Milliband has adopted a kid FROM THE USA!!
WTF is that about? There are 5000 here at any one time waiting for adoption!!
Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr Banghead Angry9: Angry9: Angry9:
Sez it all really... evil:
Post by: Barman on October 30, 2007, 12:16:17 PM
Agreed but why haven't social services taken action against them for leaving them alone in the first place. A "lower class" family would have had the remaining children removed from them.Agreed²
Many people have formed an opinion on the McCanns based on two things – their stupidity in leaving the kids alone in the first place and their apparent lack of emotion while being interviewed.
Post by: Pastis on October 30, 2007, 12:20:17 PM
And, I recall, that plonker Milliband has adopted a kid FROM THE USA!!
His second, actually! (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7067282.stm) confused:
Post by: Nick on October 30, 2007, 12:30:16 PM
See also!
Quote
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6297573.stm
I am enraged and have e mailed the bastard!
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.postimage.org%2FaV1sfLWJ.jpg&hash=532ef9efc61af31e87f8d8b2a26c2c8ec6a19001) (http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=aV1sfLWJ)
Smug f*cking hyena!
Post by: Barman on October 30, 2007, 12:41:01 PM
From the states. HOw the f*ck can he justify that?A face that you couldn't tire of smacking...
See also!Quotehttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6297573.stm
I am enraged and have e mailed the bastard!
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.postimage.org%2FaV1sfLWJ.jpg&hash=532ef9efc61af31e87f8d8b2a26c2c8ec6a19001) (http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=aV1sfLWJ)
Smug f*cking hyena!
Post by: Nick on October 30, 2007, 12:43:37 PM
I should add that despite the shoulder to shoulder high speed impact he didn't stop or apologise.
Post by: Misunderstood on October 30, 2007, 01:44:02 PM
Agreed but why haven't social services taken action against them for leaving them alone in the first place. A "lower class" family would have had the remaining children removed from them.Agreed²
Many people have formed an opinion on the McCanns based on two things – their stupidity in leaving the kids alone in the first place and their apparent lack of emotion while being interviewed.
That certainly wasn't the case at the beginning where most people admitted that 'there but for the grace of god, go I' - Everyone has done something really stupid and been mightily relieved that nobody noticed. As for emotions, well I don't know where I would be in the emotional examination line-up. saying the same things over and over again to half of the worlds media - the tears have to run out sometime.
I remarked at the time that Ian Huntley and others like him, had left permanent scars on the concept of 'how to behave as a innocent/victim on TV'. Conscious of being led up the garden by previous liars, anybody following in those footsteps will be in for a sceptical ride by an audience of whom all have various contradictory concepts of how an innocent party should behave.
I am at a loss to know how I would react under similar circumstances, if previous catastrophes are anything to go by, I would 'turn to stone', an assessment made by people witnessing my earlier reactions as completely devoid of emotion. That would undoubtedly see me guilty as sin.
On that scenario, I would obviously prefer the concept of a fair trial. Something that is being denied to the McCanns by virtue of over exposure, Maybe it was a mistake to rely on the media but I don't suppose they believed for a moment, that it would end up as a witch-hunt.
Post by: Nick on October 30, 2007, 01:59:51 PM
Post by: GROWLER on October 30, 2007, 02:01:22 PM
She did it! eveilgrin:
Pure speculation. I'd put money on it though.
Post by: Misunderstood on October 30, 2007, 02:03:10 PM
She did it! eveilgrin:
She did what exactly?
Post by: Nick on October 30, 2007, 02:18:32 PM
Post by: Uncle Mort on October 30, 2007, 02:38:03 PM
Post by: Darwins Selection on October 30, 2007, 02:38:18 PM
And, I recall, that plonker Milliband has adopted a kid FROM THE USA!!
His second, actually! (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7067282.stm) confused:
Did he 'lose' his first one as well?
Post by: Nick on October 30, 2007, 02:42:55 PM
It's the hiding problem that makes me believe they didn't do it. Where could they have hidden the body and then, if it was so well hidden, why move it three weeks later?
She did it!
Post by: Uncle Mort on November 01, 2007, 09:49:56 AM
Post by: Barman on November 01, 2007, 09:55:50 AM
Quote
Mr McCann, a consultant cardiologist at Leicester's Glenfield Hospital, is expected to resume his duties by working three half days a week.Not full time then?
Post by: Nick on November 01, 2007, 09:59:17 AM
They will prolly have him cleaning the bogs or summat
Post by: Uncle Mort on November 01, 2007, 10:11:36 AM
Post by: Barman on November 01, 2007, 10:13:00 AM
Well it's not likely to be the hospital creche. eeek:;D
Post by: Nick on November 01, 2007, 10:15:11 AM
Post by: Darwins Selection on November 01, 2007, 10:26:11 AM
I know a surgeon who is a serious dipso (local) His hands shake. He operates mainly in the willy department scared2:
The shaking is probably a benefit then.
Post by: Berek on November 01, 2007, 11:11:22 AM
drumroll: drumroll:
Post by: Nick on November 01, 2007, 11:13:43 AM
Post by: Berek on November 01, 2007, 11:17:09 AM
It was 9am !! What time does the prick start work ??, I'm out at 7am !!!
Post by: Nick on November 01, 2007, 11:21:40 AM
Post by: Berek on November 01, 2007, 11:31:50 AM
Post by: Berek on November 01, 2007, 12:19:19 PM
Post by: Nick on November 01, 2007, 12:21:14 PM
Post by: Berek on November 01, 2007, 12:24:53 PM
Post by: Marley's Ghost (Imbiber of Spirits) on November 01, 2007, 01:00:51 PM
He lost it!
No, it was probably abducted - police are looking into it!
Post by: Nick on November 01, 2007, 01:01:49 PM
Post by: Marley's Ghost (Imbiber of Spirits) on November 01, 2007, 01:06:15 PM
Check the boot, I say.
Which one? Right or left? His or hers? (Hers would doubtless be FMB style boots - not that I'd want to of course!)
Post by: Nick on November 01, 2007, 01:19:45 PM
The quality on here is going down noooo:
Post by: Marley's Ghost (Imbiber of Spirits) on November 01, 2007, 01:41:45 PM
alien
The quality on here is going down noooo:
Was that ever in doubt?
Though we do seem to be heading into PMS and Bra Strap territory with the number of posts!
Post by: Barman on November 01, 2007, 01:44:45 PM
Post by: Marley's Ghost (Imbiber of Spirits) on November 01, 2007, 01:46:41 PM
We need Snoopy back... whistle:
Why???
He's enjoying himself at the Daisy Hill Puppy Farm or somesuch on his hols. Leave him be!
Post by: Nick on November 01, 2007, 01:48:40 PM
She did it!
Post by: Bar Wench on November 01, 2007, 01:51:37 PM
We need Snoopy back... whistle:
Oh because he so adds quality to the quantity! ::)
Post by: Barman on November 01, 2007, 01:58:22 PM
yes...We need Snoopy back... whistle:
Oh because he so adds quality to the quantity! ::)
Post by: Bar Wench on November 01, 2007, 01:59:41 PM
yes...We need Snoopy back... whistle:
Oh because he so adds quality to the quantity! ::)
eeek:
Post by: Darwins Selection on November 01, 2007, 02:07:18 PM
We need Snoopy back... whistle:
Why???
He's enjoying himself at the Daisy Hill Puppy Farm or somesuch on his hols. Leave him be!
Is he at Stud?
Post by: Nick on November 01, 2007, 02:08:25 PM
Post by: Barman on November 01, 2007, 02:16:51 PM
It is a holiday. Bridport he said. I doubt it noooo:Dorset surely?
Post by: Nick on November 01, 2007, 02:19:05 PM
Post by: Barman on November 01, 2007, 02:33:09 PM
Don't call me shirley. Are we on the post record yet?Nearly - only 7,333 to make it this month!
Post by: tel on November 01, 2007, 02:35:20 PM
Don't call me shirley. Are we on the post record yet?Nearly - only 7,333 to make it this month!
How many each, is that?
Post by: Uncle Mort on November 01, 2007, 02:43:10 PM
Post by: Barman on November 01, 2007, 03:39:11 PM
120 for each member listed (that incudes Nick's many alter egos of course ::))Or about 1,000 for each of the active members... whistle:
Post by: Pastis on November 01, 2007, 04:47:43 PM
Post by: Pastis on November 01, 2007, 04:48:00 PM
Post by: Pastis on November 01, 2007, 04:48:15 PM
Post by: Pastis on November 01, 2007, 04:48:30 PM
Post by: Pastis on November 01, 2007, 04:48:51 PM
Post by: Bar Wench on November 01, 2007, 04:48:58 PM
Post by: Pastis on November 01, 2007, 04:49:29 PM
Post by: Pastis on November 01, 2007, 04:49:49 PM
Post by: Pastis on November 01, 2007, 04:50:07 PM
Post by: Pastis on November 01, 2007, 04:50:23 PM
Post by: Pastis on November 01, 2007, 04:50:37 PM
Post by: Pastis on November 01, 2007, 04:50:57 PM
Post by: Pastis on November 01, 2007, 04:51:43 PM
Post by: Berek on November 01, 2007, 05:09:37 PM
Caribbean. OK?
get me a dodgy watch off the fella on the beach
and if you see Desmond say hello.. he used to cut my hair
Post by: Pastis on November 01, 2007, 05:24:31 PM
Post by: Barman on November 01, 2007, 05:41:58 PM
Caribbean. OK?Have a great time then!
Post by: Pastis on November 01, 2007, 05:56:05 PM
Caribbean. OK?Have a great time then!
I thank you. ;) You might get the occasional postcard... just keeping in touch, like whistle:
Post by: Darwins Selection on November 01, 2007, 06:16:45 PM
You mean Desmond Me ears are alight Decker?He's funny and sly as I remember.
Post by: Berek on November 01, 2007, 08:45:41 PM
You mean Desmond Me ears are alight Decker?
No, I mean Desmond the barber from Peckham
Post by: Snoopy on November 02, 2007, 06:11:37 PM
You mean Desmond Me ears are alight Decker?
No, I mean Desmond the barber from Peckham
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.screenonline.org.uk%2Ffiles%2F1191840.jpg&hash=7ef33e34ae74dd19c87ad338032ec363eb037588)
Norman Beaton ~ Died in 1994
Post by: Darwins Selection on November 02, 2007, 07:26:51 PM
You mean Desmond Me ears are alight Decker?
No, I mean Desmond the barber from Peckham
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.screenonline.org.uk%2Ffiles%2F1191840.jpg&hash=7ef33e34ae74dd19c87ad338032ec363eb037588)
Norman Beaton ~ Died in 1994
Sad loss.
His wife wrote excellent cookbooks.
Post by: Barman on November 03, 2007, 05:59:22 AM
drumroll:You mean Desmond Me ears are alight Decker?
No, I mean Desmond the barber from Peckham
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.screenonline.org.uk%2Ffiles%2F1191840.jpg&hash=7ef33e34ae74dd19c87ad338032ec363eb037588)
Norman Beaton ~ Died in 1994
Sad loss.
His wife wrote excellent cookbooks.
Post by: Barman on November 03, 2007, 05:59:58 AM
Post by: Berek on November 03, 2007, 08:24:52 AM
Post by: Barman on November 03, 2007, 11:10:08 AM
Is it only six months? noooo:
Post by: Berek on November 03, 2007, 11:12:00 AM
Post by: Snoopy on November 03, 2007, 11:19:16 AM
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article2789070.ece
Post by: Berek on November 03, 2007, 11:30:01 AM
Post by: Snoopy on November 03, 2007, 11:34:51 AM
Seriously I have nothing but admiration for you ~ I couldn't do what you do for a fortune, not even for half an hour.
Post by: GROWLER on November 03, 2007, 08:17:17 PM
I'm off to the newsagents to que up right now for the delivery of this one. noooo:
Post by: Barman on November 04, 2007, 06:16:36 AM
New suspects being revealed in tomorrows Sunday Express apparently! eeek:Here you go!
I'm off to the newsagents to que up right now for the delivery of this one. noooo:
Unseen Madeleine picture released (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7077347.stm)
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fnewsimg.bbc.co.uk%2Fmedia%2Fimages%2F44216000%2Fjpg%2F_44216748_maddypony203b.jpg&hash=414c9c0916c205a1f4be87e758de15e935e0feaf)
It was the pony what done it like!
Post by: Snoopy on November 04, 2007, 07:57:43 AM
Skimmed all the papers whilst I was at it.
Sunday Times is no better.
Still ..... at least I have saved the money by not actually buying the papers so I shouldn't complain I s'pose.
Post by: Berek on November 04, 2007, 09:37:49 AM
Post by: Barman on November 04, 2007, 09:38:58 AM
The Express is also reporting that Mourinho is going to Liverpool !Did he take little Maddie then? rubschin:
Post by: Snoopy on November 04, 2007, 09:54:36 AM
The Express is also reporting that Mourinho is going to Liverpool !Did he take little Maddie then? rubschin:
Weeeeeeeelllllllllllllll ~ He is Portuguese ~ puts him as far into the frame as the many others named to date.
Post by: Nick on November 06, 2007, 11:25:25 AM
It's all over, bar the trial!
Post by: Barman on November 06, 2007, 11:26:02 AM
I see Kate McCann has confessed at last.eeek:
It's all over, bar the trial!
Post by: Bar Wench on November 06, 2007, 11:26:29 AM
I see Kate McCann has confessed at last.
It's all over, bar the trial!
Where?
Post by: Darwins Selection on November 06, 2007, 11:27:51 AM
I see Kate McCann has confessed at last.
It's all over, bar the trial!
Where?
On BBC 24, just after the alien landings at Cheam report. ::)
Post by: Nick on November 06, 2007, 11:28:41 AM
Post by: Bar Wench on November 06, 2007, 11:29:48 AM
Post by: Barman on November 06, 2007, 11:36:25 AM
Post by: Misunderstood on November 06, 2007, 02:41:01 PM
NICK IS BORED
Post by: Nick on November 06, 2007, 02:42:03 PM
OK?
Post by: Misunderstood on November 06, 2007, 02:44:24 PM
I was then. Waiting for Huw (sp.) Edwards to stop wittering.
OK?
OK!
Post by: Nick on November 06, 2007, 02:46:42 PM
Sky New NOW!
Post by: Uncle Mort on November 06, 2007, 02:48:02 PM
Post by: Nick on November 06, 2007, 03:14:42 PM
Post by: Misunderstood on November 06, 2007, 03:16:23 PM
NO, corpse in the boot and the whole lot.
:lalalala
Post by: Barman on November 06, 2007, 03:43:00 PM
Post by: Nick on November 06, 2007, 03:46:20 PM
Post by: Misunderstood on November 06, 2007, 04:05:16 PM
I Want CLOSURE
As do we all, but not at any price. There must be a small space left for the truth and a spot of evidence.
Post by: Mr Happy on November 06, 2007, 11:52:41 PM
Maddie aged 4 minus two parents important careers, minus sleep, minus quality time for twins, minus time alone whilst parents dining out...
If posession is 9/10's the abductors, the ones that don't exist, are probably taking the lead...
Post by: Misunderstood on November 07, 2007, 12:08:21 AM
Six months must be about an eighth of her life.
Maddie aged 4 minus two parents important careers, minus sleep, minus quality time for twins, minus time alone whilst parents dining out...
If posession is 9/10's the abductors, the ones that don't exist, are probably taking the lead...
confused: That's very profound. Mind you don't go scorching your brain
Post by: GROWLER on November 07, 2007, 12:16:31 AM
Six months must be about an eighth of her life.
Maddie aged 4 minus two parents important careers, minus sleep, minus quality time for twins, minus time alone whilst parents dining out...
If posession is 9/10's the abductors, the ones that don't exist, are probably taking the lead...
confused: That's very profound. Mind you don't go scorching your brain
Well mine's TOTALLY cabbaged now reading that.
What exactly is he saying...in english like? confused:
Post by: Misunderstood on November 07, 2007, 12:20:55 AM
I THINK he's saying... that in terms of aggregated time of Maddie and family, the abductor (if there is one) is ahead in the percentage of possession of her lifespan. (if there is one)
Post by: GROWLER on November 07, 2007, 12:28:36 AM
::) You're expecting a translation? eeek:
I THINK he's saying... that in terms of aggregated time of Maddie and family, the abductor (if there is one) is ahead in the percentage of possession of her lifespan. (if there is one)
Doesn't add up that, well not in my 'ed it doesn't. noooo:
Does it really matter anyway? noooo:
Post by: Darwins Selection on November 07, 2007, 08:59:24 AM
Doesn't add up that, well not in my 'ed it doesn't. noooo:
Does it really matter anyway? noooo:
Yer 'ed?
Nah! ;)
Post by: Mr Happy on November 07, 2007, 11:19:32 PM
Six months must be about an eighth of her life.
Maddie aged 4 minus two parents important careers, minus sleep, minus quality time for twins, minus time alone whilst parents dining out...
If posession is 9/10's the abductors, the ones that don't exist, are probably taking the lead...
confused: That's very profound. Mind you don't go scorching your brain
Well mine's TOTALLY cabbaged now reading that.
What exactly is he saying...in english like? confused:
In my defence may i offer up two badgers, a speckled hen, an old bob and whatever else was in my magic cupboard.
It is an interesting point though, perhaps tongue in cheek in this instance. There was that young boy that went missing about twenty years ago, surely those that abducted him will simply be ma and pa in his eyes.
Latest news is that Kate has been told not to cry in front of cameras in case the abductor is getting off on it. Well that must be why she looks like she doesn't give two shits...
Post by: Barman on November 08, 2007, 05:32:27 AM
;DSix months must be about an eighth of her life.
Maddie aged 4 minus two parents important careers, minus sleep, minus quality time for twins, minus time alone whilst parents dining out...
If posession is 9/10's the abductors, the ones that don't exist, are probably taking the lead...
confused: That's very profound. Mind you don't go scorching your brain
Well mine's TOTALLY cabbaged now reading that.
What exactly is he saying...in english like? confused:
In my defence may i offer up two badgers, a speckled hen, an old bob and whatever else was in my magic cupboard.
It is an interesting point though, perhaps tongue in cheek in this instance. There was that young boy that went missing about twenty years ago, surely those that abducted him will simply be ma and pa in his eyes.
Latest news is that Kate has been told not to cry in front of cameras in case the abductor is getting off on it. Well that must be why she looks like she doesn't give two shits...
Post by: Berek on November 18, 2007, 09:45:08 AM
Post by: Barman on November 18, 2007, 11:12:08 AM
Tut Tut we were starting to forget about the wean.. whistle:How is she?
Post by: TG on November 19, 2007, 12:54:09 PM
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/topstories/2007/11/19/witness-saw-murat-s-girlfriend-with-madeleine-89520-20126003/
But wait :
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=494927&in_page_id=1811
noooo:
Post by: Nick on November 19, 2007, 01:11:01 PM
Post by: TG on November 19, 2007, 01:38:01 PM
Expect charges soon! happy088
Post by: Barman on November 19, 2007, 01:39:16 PM
I get the feeling the McCann saga is about to come to some kind of a conclusion.I do hope so... noooo:
Expect charges soon! happy088
Post by: Nick on November 19, 2007, 01:42:28 PM
Post by: Barman on November 19, 2007, 01:43:55 PM
Post by: Bar Wench on November 19, 2007, 01:45:14 PM
Post by: Nick on November 19, 2007, 01:45:53 PM
Let's try!
Post by: Bar Wench on November 19, 2007, 01:47:03 PM
That WOULD break the board!
Let's try!
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freesmileys.org%2Femo%2Fsigns011.gif&hash=39eb5c591d4fb3a7eb7cbb235672b0e5fd65085b)
Post by: TG on November 19, 2007, 01:48:11 PM
Post by: TG on November 19, 2007, 01:49:02 PM
Post by: TG on November 19, 2007, 01:49:53 PM
Post by: Darwins Selection on November 19, 2007, 01:51:59 PM
Allow me. whistle:Ah well. Moving on.... tunble:Yeah happy088I forgot to press quote. cry:
Post by: TG on November 19, 2007, 01:52:39 PM
Allow me. whistle:Ah well. Moving on.... tunble:Yeah happy088I forgot to press quote. cry:
Cheers!
Post by: Bar Wench on November 19, 2007, 01:59:39 PM
Allow me. whistle:Ah well. Moving on.... tunble:Yeah happy088I forgot to press quote. cry:
Cheers!
eveilgrin:
Post by: Barman on November 19, 2007, 02:10:46 PM
doh:Allow me. whistle:Ah well. Moving on.... tunble:Yeah happy088I forgot to press quote. cry:
Cheers!
eveilgrin:
Post by: Darwins Selection on November 19, 2007, 02:13:50 PM
doh: doh:doh:Allow me. whistle:Ah well. Moving on.... tunble:Yeah happy088I forgot to press quote. cry:
Cheers!
eveilgrin:
Post by: Nick on November 19, 2007, 02:16:11 PM
doh: doh:doh:Allow me. whistle:Ah well. Moving on.... tunble:Yeah happy088I forgot to press quote. cry:
Cheers!
Will this help the investigation?
eveilgrin:
Post by: TG on November 19, 2007, 02:24:51 PM
doh: doh:doh:Allow me. whistle:Ah well. Moving on.... tunble:Yeah happy088I forgot to press quote. cry:
Cheers!
Will this help the investigation?
eveilgrin:
If you take out all the shite and quotathons this thread would only be about 3 pages long. whistle:
Post by: Nick on November 19, 2007, 02:38:03 PM
doh: doh:doh:Allow me. whistle:Ah well. Moving on.... tunble:Yeah happy088I forgot to press quote. cry:
Cheers!
Will this help the investigation?
eveilgrin:
If you take out all the shite and quotathons this thread would only be about 3 pages long. whistle:
4?
Post by: TG on November 19, 2007, 02:57:42 PM
doh: doh:doh:Allow me. whistle:Ah well. Moving on.... tunble:Yeah happy088I forgot to press quote. cry:
Cheers!
Will this help the investigation?
eveilgrin:
If you take out all the shite and quotathons this thread would only be about 3 pages long. whistle:
4?
Nope. 3.
Post by: Nick on November 19, 2007, 03:00:06 PM
doh: doh:doh:Allow me. whistle:Ah well. Moving on.... tunble:Yeah happy088I forgot to press quote. cry:
Cheers!
Will this help the investigation?
eveilgrin:
If you take out all the shite and quotathons this thread would only be about 3 pages long. whistle:
4?
Nope. 3.
7
Post by: Snoopy on November 19, 2007, 03:05:10 PM
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.childrensmuseum.org%2Fspecial_exhibits%2Fgood_grief%2Fimages%2Flogo_goodgrief.jpg&hash=31e40e3a3639e4df86c63d5fdbcab364eef7c4c9)doh: doh:doh:Allow me. whistle:Ah well. Moving on.... tunble:Yeah happy088I forgot to press quote. cry:
Cheers!
Will this help the investigation?
eveilgrin:
If you take out all the shite and quotathons this thread would only be about 3 pages long. whistle:
4?
Nope. 3.
7
Post by: Berek on November 19, 2007, 04:13:56 PM
Post by: Nick on November 19, 2007, 05:45:48 PM
OK?
Post by: The Moan Ranger on November 19, 2007, 09:13:23 PM
Post by: The Moan Ranger on November 19, 2007, 09:34:47 PM
Post by: TG on November 19, 2007, 10:08:50 PM
Words fail me. This is the biggest pile of cunt I have ever seen. BBC - could do a lot better - see teacher.
Thats a bit harsh.... eeek:
Whatever a kind of pile it was there was still nothing new.
Right, I'm going to read my profile for a bit, watch some goat porn and go to bed none the wiser.
Post by: Mr Happy on November 19, 2007, 10:59:57 PM
Post by: TG on December 06, 2007, 08:45:48 AM
She is officially 'old news' now.
Post by: Snoopy on December 06, 2007, 08:47:31 AM
Post by: Snoopy on December 07, 2007, 06:52:27 PM
Gerry McCann nominated for Scot of the Year
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/12/07/wmaddy107.xml
Post by: TG on December 07, 2007, 07:15:13 PM
I FIND THIS HARD TO BELIEVEGerry McCann nominated for Scot of the Year
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/12/07/wmaddy107.xml
I dont know what to say!
Post by: Nick on December 07, 2007, 07:25:22 PM
Post by: Darwins Selection on December 07, 2007, 07:37:56 PM
Post by: Uncle Mort on December 10, 2007, 08:44:09 AM
Post by: Nick on December 10, 2007, 08:44:53 AM
Post by: Bar Wench on December 10, 2007, 08:45:04 AM
Post by: Nick on December 14, 2007, 09:53:01 AM
What a pile of shite. In any case publishing the fact that "We know who you are and where you are keeping her" is an open invitation to someone to start digging up the patio...........
Post by: Barman on December 14, 2007, 09:55:07 AM
Quote
The agency is receiving £50,000 a month from the fund set up to find Madeleine and the detectives are running a parallel investigation to the police hunt.eeek:
Post by: Nick on December 14, 2007, 09:57:26 AM
Post by: Uncle Mort on January 08, 2008, 05:01:15 PM
McCanns 'in talks' to make Maddie The Movie
(http://www.metro.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=82829&in_page_id=34)
Post by: Snoopy on January 08, 2008, 05:19:27 PM
Post by: Just One More on January 08, 2008, 07:25:30 PM
Post by: The Moan Ranger on January 08, 2008, 08:05:32 PM
Post by: Snoopy on January 09, 2008, 09:32:07 AM
Do we have any other source which might or might not confirm the story?
Post by: tel on January 09, 2008, 09:39:07 AM
Post by: Snoopy on January 09, 2008, 09:41:54 AM
Post by: Uncle Mort on January 09, 2008, 10:00:59 AM
Post by: Berek on January 09, 2008, 11:59:04 AM
Post by: Darwins Selection on January 09, 2008, 12:57:12 PM
I wonder who will play them in the film ?? and who will play the one eyed monster next door ?? Gordon Brown perhaps ??
I would have expected you to have a small part.
Post by: Nick on January 09, 2008, 12:58:01 PM
Post by: Berek on January 09, 2008, 07:35:20 PM
I wonder who will play them in the film ?? and who will play the one eyed monster next door ?? Gordon Brown perhaps ??
I would have expected you to have a small part.
Have you been talking to Meg ? eeek:
Post by: TG on January 11, 2008, 02:13:53 PM
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-1300255,00.html
Post by: Berek on January 11, 2008, 03:04:12 PM
bookingdesk@julietadams.co.uk
or ring
0208 671 7673
Post by: Darwins Selection on January 20, 2008, 03:32:10 PM
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.postimage.org%2FPq52UCYr.jpg&hash=29a8ba32dde00f536711619c4163ed8eb0fe3cac) (http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=Pq52UCYr)
Post by: Barman on January 20, 2008, 03:35:01 PM
George Harrison is the new suspect.Oh my sweet lord... noooo:
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.postimage.org%2FPq52UCYr.jpg&hash=29a8ba32dde00f536711619c4163ed8eb0fe3cac) (http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=Pq52UCYr)
Post by: Mr Happy on January 20, 2008, 09:05:50 PM
What are we now 8 or so months in? Suddenly someone remembers seeing a man, not just any man but someone looking 'ill at ease'. Anybody connected to the murderous twat 'parents' should look ill at ease.
And why is it that pictures of suspects are lifted straight from American horror films yet the usual culprits are trolley collectors called Norman?
Post by: Nick on February 06, 2008, 11:06:22 AM
Post by: Uncle Mort on February 06, 2008, 11:14:21 AM
Post by: Mr Happy on February 06, 2008, 11:54:30 PM
Post by: The Moan Ranger on February 27, 2008, 12:21:10 PM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bradford/7265084.stm
Now why would that be, I wonder rubschin:
Post by: Nick on February 27, 2008, 12:27:16 PM
What else can I say.
I am a parent of a 9 year old. They (actually mother) took FOUR HOURS to report her missing. FOUR HOURS!!!!
Ok. WOrking class and not media savvy.
Rought.
One assumes dead.
Very sad
Post by: Berek on February 27, 2008, 12:28:47 PM
Post by: Berek on February 27, 2008, 12:33:18 PM
http://www.findmadeleine.com/blog/
Post by: tel on March 14, 2008, 03:10:04 PM
Post by: Barman on March 14, 2008, 03:11:40 PM
http://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/index.php?topic=3098.0
Post by: Snoopy on March 19, 2008, 11:07:48 AM
Bloody right too evil:
Post by: Mr Happy on March 19, 2008, 07:42:02 PM
Why do they continue to put these lines together?
Post by: Barman on March 19, 2008, 08:16:53 PM
"We acknowledge that there is no evidence whatsoever to support this theory and that Kate and Gerry are completely innocent of any involvement in their daughter's disappearance."i don't know how they can say that 'til the case is solved... noooo:
Why do they continue to put these lines together?
Post by: Snoopy on May 03, 2008, 01:09:18 PM
Post by: Berek on May 04, 2008, 01:37:08 PM
Post by: TG on May 04, 2008, 01:40:28 PM
I was thinking that this morning, but the photos of her parents still outwiegh the photos of her.
Well, a year on they only have a few photo's of maddie. In the last year there have been millions of photo's of the parents.
I expect that explains the difference.
Post by: Berek on May 04, 2008, 01:42:31 PM
Post by: Nick on May 04, 2008, 04:34:30 PM
Post by: Barman on May 04, 2008, 05:11:46 PM
Have they gone back to work yet?He has... noooo:
Post by: Snoopy on June 30, 2008, 06:22:02 PM
Post by: Barman on June 30, 2008, 07:41:40 PM
No ~ don't let's forget.I had...
Post by: Uncle Mort on July 01, 2008, 07:24:18 AM
<edit>
oddly enough:
Police 'closing' Madeleine case (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7482799.stm)
Post by: Berek on July 01, 2008, 02:33:29 PM
Post by: Snoopy on July 15, 2008, 02:28:03 PM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7507357.stm
Post by: Berek on July 15, 2008, 02:30:31 PM
And now the buggers are making money out of her. noooo:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7507357.stm
Ah yes, the " Evil one eyed monster who has a daughter the spitting image of Maddy "
Post by: Uncle Mort on July 15, 2008, 02:42:27 PM
Post by: Snoopy on July 15, 2008, 02:50:06 PM
Sure the media went over the top but both the parents and Murat brought that on themselves through their actions and comments made to reporters. I just hope that any damages gained will be frozen until the investigation is formally closed and then handed over to a charity for abused children. It is just wrong for anyone involved in anyway to benefit from that little girl's loss. They could have all settled for an apology.
Post by: Uncle Mort on July 15, 2008, 03:25:33 PM
As to the damages you don't know where they will go, although I bet the lawyers arn't doing for free.
his lawyers named the Sun, Daily Express, Sunday Express, Daily Star, Daily Mail, London Evening Standard, Metro, Daily Mirror, Sunday Mirror, News of the World and the Scotsman.
The good old British Press ::)
Post by: The Moan Ranger on July 15, 2008, 03:34:10 PM
:-)
But they (McCanns) should be charged and found guilty of neglect.
Post by: Uncle Mort on July 15, 2008, 03:38:36 PM
Post by: Barman on July 15, 2008, 04:14:02 PM
Agreed.Thirded
Post by: The Moan Ranger on July 15, 2008, 05:04:20 PM
B'stards.
Post by: Landlady on July 15, 2008, 05:12:58 PM
And then taken outside and both shot in the back of the head. And then charge the "fund" 20p for the two bullets.
B'stards.
I have to say that I really do want to agree with MR's statement/suggestion here - okay wrong to damn someone until PROVEN guilty I also agree BUT if it hadn't been for their own neglect of their own children in the first place Maddy would 'probably' not be missing now -I still feel something is very wrong about them, not proven I know, but thats how I feel
Post by: Barman on July 15, 2008, 05:37:26 PM
And then taken outside and both shot in the back of the head. And then charge the "fund" 20p for the two bullets.Seconded... and I'll donate the 20p from the poor box on the ba- where the bloody hell did that go? cussing:
B'stards.
Post by: Snoopy on July 15, 2008, 05:48:54 PM
Post by: Barman on July 15, 2008, 05:51:50 PM
Pikeys were in earlier ~ flogging pegs and white heatherAnd why did you let them in? noooo:
Post by: Snoopy on July 15, 2008, 06:07:08 PM
Pikeys were in earlier ~ flogging pegs and white heatherAnd why did you let them in? noooo:
They snuck in while I was taking a comfort break.
(Having a crap if you must know and LL objects when I do that in the bar as you know)
Post by: Darwins Selection on July 15, 2008, 06:36:26 PM
Post by: Nick on July 15, 2008, 06:58:43 PM
Quote
if it hadn't been for their own neglect of their own children in the first place Maddy would 'probably' not be missing now
Why the "probably"?
Post by: Bar Wench on July 16, 2008, 07:50:13 AM
I'm with LL, there is something not quite right about them.
Post by: Snoopy on July 16, 2008, 07:53:04 AM
Post by: Barman on July 16, 2008, 08:11:54 AM
Post by: Uncle Mort on July 16, 2008, 09:09:20 AM
The child was either abducted from the room or had woken and wandered off looking for her parents and was subsequently abducted. The parents and friends probably lied about how many times and how carefully they checked on the children but that's it.
Post by: Berek on August 05, 2008, 10:18:13 AM
Now that they have been cleared as suspects why do they still need that annoying prick of a spokesman on the books and at what cost ???, he really gets on my tits.
I still think they should be charged with neglect, how the fuck they can say they are not responsible for her disappearence never fails to annoy me.
Post by: Snoopy on August 05, 2008, 10:20:28 AM
Post by: Berek on August 05, 2008, 01:06:54 PM
http://www.findmadeleine.com/blog/
You'd have thought he'd be doing the chat shows by now and working on the film
Post by: Snoopy on August 05, 2008, 03:55:14 PM
Post by: Uncle Mort on October 16, 2008, 10:49:31 AM
Libel payout for McCann friends (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7673148.stm)
Just pleased to see Express Newspapers getting it in the neck. Shite papers.
Post by: Barman on October 17, 2008, 10:46:15 AM
I wonder if the 'tapas seven' will be donating their loot to the 'find Maddy' appeal...?
Post by: TG on October 17, 2008, 10:48:10 AM
Well, everybody seems to have done quite well out of it all... except Maddy of course...
I wonder if the 'tapas seven' will be donating their loot to the 'find Maddy' appeal...?
I think they have.
Post by: Barman on October 17, 2008, 10:49:06 AM
Oh... redface:Well, everybody seems to have done quite well out of it all... except Maddy of course...
I wonder if the 'tapas seven' will be donating their loot to the 'find Maddy' appeal...?
I think they have.
Post by: Bar Wench on October 17, 2008, 10:53:32 AM
Cynical BM? ;)
Post by: Snoopy on October 17, 2008, 10:57:49 AM
Post by: Barman on October 17, 2008, 10:59:09 AM
Post by: TG on October 17, 2008, 10:59:51 AM
All right, all right... keep your hair on all of you! ::)point:
Post by: Barman on October 17, 2008, 11:01:49 AM
Post by: Bar Wench on October 17, 2008, 11:02:28 AM
Post by: Snoopy on October 17, 2008, 11:03:06 AM
I hadn't realised it was "Be nasty to Barman" day... sad24:
Only because none of us know how to put it on the calendar. whistle:
Post by: Nick on October 17, 2008, 11:15:48 AM
Oh, and Barman
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.postimage.org%2FaV1qcljJ.jpg&hash=846a80ff2896def48890214bd1ffcdd27394ab55) (http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=aV1qcljJ)
Post by: Nick on November 20, 2008, 08:35:27 PM
Post by: Barman on November 20, 2008, 08:37:23 PM
It's gone a bit quiet,likeIs she dead like...?
Post by: Nick on November 20, 2008, 08:37:59 PM
Post by: Barman on November 20, 2008, 08:40:26 PM
Don't even think about itI didn't... scared2:
Post by: Nick on November 20, 2008, 08:41:28 PM
Post by: Barman on March 20, 2009, 09:29:09 PM
Post by: Snoopy on March 21, 2009, 08:45:45 AM
Post by: Miss Demeanour on August 08, 2009, 05:01:56 PM
The investigators yesterday issued an e-fit of the woman, described as an Australian Victoria Beckham-lookalike, who reportedly asked a witness if he was there to deliver her "new daughter" just days after the Leicestershire girl's disappearance.
Clarence Mitchell, spokesman for Kate and Gerry McCann, said there had already been a "substantial" response to the appeal, including several possible names for the woman.
Do you reckon those names could be Posh Spice noooo:
Post by: Barman on August 08, 2009, 05:03:21 PM
Private detectives searching for Madeleine McCann have received hundreds of calls after appealing for information about a mysterious woman, the family's spokesman has said.lol: lol: lol:
The investigators yesterday issued an e-fit of the woman, described as an Australian Victoria Beckham-lookalike, who reportedly asked a witness if he was there to deliver her "new daughter" just days after the Leicestershire girl's disappearance.
Clarence Mitchell, spokesman for Kate and Gerry McCann, said there had already been a "substantial" response to the appeal, including several possible names for the woman.
Do you reckon those names could be Posh Spice noooo:
Post by: Nick on August 08, 2009, 06:46:32 PM
Post by: Barman on August 08, 2009, 06:47:23 PM
I think Madonna's in the frame rubschin:What, growing cucumbers and stuff...? rubschin:
Post by: Miss Demeanour on August 08, 2009, 06:48:25 PM
I think Madonna's in the frame rubschin:
Nah - she's just voguing again whistle:
Post by: Nick on August 08, 2009, 06:49:17 PM
I think Madonna's in the frame rubschin:What, growing cucumbers and stuff...? rubschin:
Has the Dettol gone to your head?
Post by: Barman on August 08, 2009, 06:49:54 PM
No, the wood varnish prolly... surrender:I think Madonna's in the frame rubschin:What, growing cucumbers and stuff...? rubschin:
Has the Dettol gone to your head?
Post by: Nick on August 08, 2009, 06:50:40 PM
Post by: Miss Demeanour on August 08, 2009, 06:51:16 PM
Post by: Barman on August 08, 2009, 06:52:52 PM
I bought some wood varnish today sleep017Did it do what it said on the tin...?
Mine didn't - five years my arse! cussing:
Post by: Nick on August 08, 2009, 06:53:34 PM
I also got ONE stair rail, two lots of grouting stuff, a Mastic Gun, a tape measure, some sort of wood filler and a quote for carpetting a house eeek:
Oh and this week we have floor sander man, a glazier, a painter AND the joy of a trip to fooking Wales
Post by: Barman on August 08, 2009, 06:54:48 PM
::)A mastic gun! cloud9:
I also got ONE stair rail, two lots of grouting stuff, a Mastic Gun, a tape measure, some sort of wood filler and a quote for carpetting a house eeek:
Oh and this week we have floor sander man, a glazier, a painter AND the joy of a trip to fooking Wales
Did you point it like a real gun, did ya, DID YA PUNK??? eveilgrin:
Post by: Nick on August 08, 2009, 06:56:36 PM
Post by: Miss Demeanour on August 08, 2009, 06:57:20 PM
Post by: Barman on August 08, 2009, 06:58:14 PM
It is not yet loaded. But having read all the (Fleming) Bond novels since Monday I am in a very odd mood rubschin:World domination and stuff...?
Post by: Nick on August 08, 2009, 06:58:50 PM
Post by: Barman on August 08, 2009, 07:00:39 PM
I met that OddJob guy once (the actor). I tried to sell him membership of a book club redface:Popcorn:
Post by: Nick on August 08, 2009, 07:02:44 PM
He watched me scared2:
Then he shut the door noooo:
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg34.imageshack.us%2Fimg34%2F6284%2F22720829.jpg&hash=ae5829ffc92d4c22f909c88eeab6e03e0b8f7243) (http://www.postimage.org/)
One does not get the sense of a devoted reader noooo:
Post by: Barman on August 08, 2009, 07:05:10 PM
Summer 1978. I was werking as a door to door salesman. I knocked on his door in Shepherd's Bush. He answered and I did my spiel.Well at least he didn't throw his hat at you... noooo:
He watched me scared2:
Then he shut the door noooo:
Post by: Nick on August 08, 2009, 07:06:52 PM
Post by: Barman on August 08, 2009, 07:07:39 PM
He wasn't wearing a hat.He prolly threw it at the Mormons then - lucky you eh?
Post by: Darwins Selection on August 08, 2009, 10:55:00 PM
lol: lol: lol:He wasn't wearing a hat.He prolly threw it at the Mormons then - lucky you eh?
Post by: Miss Demeanour on November 23, 2009, 11:30:05 AM
Kevin Halligen, 48, from Surrey, is wanted in the United States for allegedly conning a law firm out of $2.1m in fees which he spent on himself, including the purchase of a mansion.
The Washington-based businessman, who styled himself as a security expert with FBI and MI5 connections has not been arrested because officials in the United States do not know where he is.
Halligen?s firm, Oakley International, was given a six-month contract by the Madeleine Fund in 2008 to carry out detective work and review CCTV footage of possible sightings of the missing girl around the world, but was dropped after six months because of a lack of progress.
Thousands of Britons donated money to the fund, which topped ?2m in the months after the toddler disappeared from a holiday flat in Portugal in May 2007.
Some of the money was spent on private detectives, including ?300,000 given to Oakley.
So that's ?300,000 donated by the public for nothing ::) .....
Is absolutely everybody on the take noooo:
Post by: Snoopy on November 23, 2009, 11:37:21 AM
Post by: GROWLER on November 23, 2009, 01:15:55 PM
So that's ?300,000 donated by the public for nothing ::) .....
Is absolutely everybody on the take noooo:
In business, virtually absolutely yes.
In terms of the public, 95% of those that are on benefits and have no intention of working ever whatsoever for whatever reason, yes.
We are now living in a virtually total corrupt world, full of lying thieving scamsterising selfish bullying greedy bastards.
I trust virtually no one, as I think whatever they say or do, it's to enable them to prise more money out of my and your pockets, and to line their own.
Nobody gives a stuff anymore. We're all on our own as individuals. Dog eat dog, fact.
You are totally untrustworthy until proved otherwise now imo. Sad that in'it?
Post by: Nick on May 06, 2011, 07:05:07 PM
Sorry, but if The Boy had disappeared in those circumstances I would bein prison by now noooo:
Post by: Barman on May 07, 2011, 04:14:33 AM
Post by: Snoopy on May 07, 2011, 05:21:18 AM
Post by: Barman on May 07, 2011, 06:45:38 AM
Post by: Uncle Mort on May 07, 2011, 09:48:09 AM
Post by: Miss Creant Commander of the picklement and baking BAb(Hons) on May 07, 2011, 12:50:39 PM
Post by: Darwins Selection on May 07, 2011, 01:18:46 PM
Now Osama's dead, I bet Maddie McCann'll be going for Hide n Seek Champion.
*Cough*
http://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/index.php?topic=2659.3705
Did you like my AFFS impersonation there?
Post by: Barman on May 07, 2011, 02:17:39 PM
Now Osama's dead, I bet Maddie McCann'll be going for Hide n Seek Champion.
*Cough*
http://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/index.php?action=post;quote=280067;topic=2659.3705;num_replies=3731;sesc=ff16b387150ca8e05dcf1e5926105cea (http://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/index.php?action=post;quote=280067;topic=2659.3705;num_replies=3731;sesc=ff16b387150ca8e05dcf1e5926105cea)
Did you like my AFFS impersonation there?
AFFS! worthy:
Post by: Miss Creant Commander of the picklement and baking BAb(Hons) on May 07, 2011, 07:43:57 PM
Session verification failed. Please try logging out and back in again, and then try again.
Session verification failed. Please try logging out and back in again, and then try again.
I am bereft. sad24:
Post by: Darwins Selection on May 07, 2011, 08:14:19 PM
I am bereft. sad24:
Is that a Growler thing?
Post by: Snoopy on May 08, 2011, 05:14:52 AM
Session verification failed. Please try logging out and back in again, and then try again.
Session verification failed. Please try logging out and back in again, and then try again.
Session verification failed. Please try logging out and back in again, and then try again.
I am bereft. sad24:
I got the same message Miss C cussing:
Post by: Barman on May 08, 2011, 05:21:23 AM
He was pointing you all here. (http://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/index.php?topic=2659.3705)
Post by: Darwins Selection on May 08, 2011, 08:20:20 AM
Quote from: Barman link=topic=944.msg281007#1304832083
Darwin cocked up the link but I have fixed it like... whistle:redface:
He was pointing you all here. (http://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/index.php?topic=2659.3705)
It's all too technical for me surrender:
Post by: Just One More on May 11, 2011, 09:38:06 PM
Post by: Darwins Selection on May 11, 2011, 09:50:24 PM
I remarked to a friend that Kate McCann is looking really tanned lately. Someone suggested it may be due to her lying in the Sun all week.
happy001 happy001 happy001
Post by: apc2010 on May 11, 2011, 10:13:07 PM
I remarked to a friend that Kate McCann is looking really tanned lately. Someone suggested it may be due to her lying in the Sun all week.
drumroll:
Post by: Barman on May 12, 2011, 04:59:10 AM
I remarked to a friend that Kate McCann is looking really tanned lately. Someone suggested it may be due to her lying in the Sun all week.
happy001
Post by: Barman on April 26, 2012, 04:51:17 AM
::)
Post by: Miss Creant Commander of the picklement and baking BAb(Hons) on April 26, 2012, 05:51:21 AM
Post by: Barman on April 26, 2012, 05:54:06 AM
She is growing into rather a pretty young lady.
Or not... whistle:
Post by: GROWLER on March 04, 2013, 04:01:54 PM
She'll be in the Army with the squaddies getting bladderd now I reckon. :thumbsup:
Anything to get away from those rancid parents of hers.
Post by: Barman on March 04, 2013, 04:07:39 PM
Post by: apc2010 on March 04, 2013, 04:08:26 PM
She's alledgedly been spotted in Aya Nappa now ffs! Shocked:
She'll be in the Army with the squaddies getting bladderd now I reckon. :thumbsup:
Anything to get away from those rancid parents of hers.
Actual story ...some couple left an apartment without paying rent ,,,,,,so to get the old bill involved ,,he says Maddie was with them ......now interpol are on his rent case... :thumbsup:
Post by: Just One More on March 04, 2013, 07:46:21 PM
Post by: apc2010 on October 14, 2013, 05:56:39 AM
Post by: Barman on October 14, 2013, 05:59:21 AM
Crimewatch tonight.......
A new timeline....? noooo:
Post by: Miss Demeanour on October 14, 2013, 06:15:50 AM
Next week there will be another before unknown witness to the Stephen Lawrence murder !!!!!!
Etc etc etc
Bet if Maddy disappeared in Aberdeen there wouldn't be a need to do so many reconstructions or keep the case alive whistle:
Post by: Barman on October 14, 2013, 06:40:09 AM
Conplete waste of time, effort and money !!!!!
Next week there will be another before unknown witness to the Stephen Lawrence murder !!!!!!
Etc etc etc
Bet if Maddy disappeared in Aberdeen there wouldn't be a need to do so many reconstructions or keep the case alive whistle:
Ooooh you cynic! lol:
Post by: Miss Demeanour on October 14, 2013, 06:51:20 AM
Desperate times call for desperate measures. How else are the police going to keep their jobs in this time of cutbacks whistle:
Post by: apc2010 on October 14, 2013, 06:52:57 AM
Who me ? angel1
Desperate times call for desperate measures. How else are the police going to keep their jobs in this time of cutbacks whistle:
And maybe a new book....... rubschin:
Post by: Darwins Selection on October 14, 2013, 07:49:17 AM
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc02.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Fi%2F2011%2F242%2F3%2F0%2Fhitler_sketch_wip_thing_by_sspirate-d48c32h.png&hash=e680d01721fe08c9b040b2fb0aa29494d082cef9)
Item 2: "500 drown in 3 refugee sinkings last week"
noooo:
Post by: apc2010 on October 14, 2013, 07:55:13 AM
BBC No 1 news item, "German man sought in Maddie case, new sketch released"
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc02.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Fi%2F2011%2F242%2F3%2F0%2Fhitler_sketch_wip_thing_by_sspirate-d48c32h.png&hash=e680d01721fe08c9b040b2fb0aa29494d082cef9)
Item 2: "500 drown in 3 refugee sinkings last week"
noooo:
;D and noooo:
Post by: Barman on October 14, 2013, 08:11:57 AM
BBC No 1 news item, "German man sought in Maddie case, new sketch released"
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc02.deviantart.net%2Ffs71%2Fi%2F2011%2F242%2F3%2F0%2Fhitler_sketch_wip_thing_by_sspirate-d48c32h.png&hash=e680d01721fe08c9b040b2fb0aa29494d082cef9)
Item 2: "500 drown in 3 refugee sinkings last week"
noooo:
;D and noooo:
^^^ wot they said ^^^
Post by: apc2010 on October 14, 2013, 11:53:53 AM
What a load of bollocks.......
They don't even look like Gerry.......... noooo:
Post by: Barman on October 14, 2013, 11:54:42 AM
Police have released two E-Fits of the man responsible for Maddie Mc-Canns disapperence.
What a load of bollocks.......
They don't even look like Gerry.......... noooo:
drumroll:
lol: lol: lol:
Post by: Baldy on October 14, 2013, 12:03:18 PM
Police have released two E-Fits of the man responsible for Maddie Mc-Canns disapperence.
What a load of bollocks.......
They don't even look like Gerry.......... noooo:
lol: lol: lol:
Post by: boogs on October 14, 2013, 02:58:50 PM
Police have released two E-Fits of the man responsible for Maddie Mc-Canns disapperence.
What a load of bollocks.......
They don't even look like Gerry.......... noooo:
Thumbs: ;D ;D
Post by: Just One More on October 14, 2013, 05:17:07 PM
Post by: Barman on October 15, 2013, 05:46:27 AM
Post by: Miss Demeanour on October 15, 2013, 06:01:19 AM
Apparently a child was snatched six years ago. They think a bloke took her. They don't know who it is . They need your help to find her .
Bish bosh wallop .....millions saved by a Miss D reconstruction :thumbsup:
Post by: Barman on October 15, 2013, 06:02:00 AM
Didn't need to
Apparently a child was snatched six years ago. They think a bloke took her. They don't know who it is . They need your help to find her .
Bish bosh wallop .....millions saved by a Miss D reconstruction :thumbsup:
Thumbs:
Post by: Just One More on October 15, 2013, 06:05:08 AM
Didn't need to
Apparently a child was snatched six years ago. They think a bloke took her. They don't know who it is . They need your help to find her .
Bish bosh wallop .....millions saved by a Miss D reconstruction :thumbsup:
lol:
Post by: Darwins Selection on October 15, 2013, 07:51:08 AM
Didn't need to
Apparently a child was snatched six years ago. They think a bloke took her. They don't know who it is . They need your help to find her .
Bish bosh wallop .....millions saved by a Miss D reconstruction :thumbsup:
You omitted ".. and it wasn't the parents' fault."
Post by: Miss Demeanour on October 15, 2013, 09:23:12 AM
Post by: Nick on October 15, 2013, 09:32:55 AM
Post by: Barman on October 15, 2013, 09:56:00 AM
Was talking about this with some pals the other day. All are parents. We agreed that not one of us would go out to dinner leaving a 3 year old alone. What were they thinking of??
Quite...
Post by: apc2010 on October 15, 2013, 09:57:10 AM
Was talking about this with some pals the other day. All are parents. We agreed that not one of us would go out to dinner leaving a 3 year old alone. What were they thinking of??
Quite...
It's ok if you give them a sleeping tablet.... Thumbs:
Post by: Nick on October 15, 2013, 10:00:35 AM
Post by: Miss Demeanour on October 15, 2013, 10:18:42 AM
Post by: Steve on October 15, 2013, 10:30:48 AM
Post by: Nick on October 15, 2013, 10:33:09 AM
Post by: Steve on October 15, 2013, 10:56:25 AM
Post by: apc2010 on October 15, 2013, 10:57:00 AM
Don't you just take em with you and bung em in a pram when they get tired rubschin:
Just read there was a "night creche" on the complex.... noooo:
Post by: apc2010 on October 15, 2013, 12:26:54 PM
Did anybody watch it...? Shrugs:
Yeah, put the kids to bed and went down the boozer to watch it........ Thumbs:
Post by: Nick on October 15, 2013, 12:41:48 PM
Post by: Steve on October 15, 2013, 12:49:27 PM
Post by: Nick on October 15, 2013, 12:56:52 PM
Post by: Baldy on October 15, 2013, 01:17:10 PM
Did anybody watch it...? Shrugs:
Yeah, put the kids to bed and went down the boozer to watch it........ Thumbs:
lol: lol: lol:
Post by: Baldy on October 15, 2013, 01:17:47 PM
No, she was kidnapped on the street and was 14. MMcC was 3 and left alone. As has often been said, if her parents were Scouse or Manc thugs they would be in clink for child neglect
Thumbs: Thumbs:
Post by: Steve on October 15, 2013, 01:27:33 PM
No, she was kidnapped on the street and was 14. MMcC was 3 and left alone. As has often been said, if her parents were Scouse or Manc thugs they would be in clink for child neglectErr no they would not, only the worst cases get that. Community orders and suspended sentences are the norm (http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/neglect-mum-left-child-4-3471837) and anyway not a cat in hell's chance of a prosecution given the incompetence and known illegal actions of the Portuguese plod.
What gets me is the incessant "we can see the parents, lets burn them at the stake" style posting that dominate discussion every time this case resurfaces. They were feckless and self interested no doubt but someone somewhere had a far darker motive and could well be continuing such evil. And as de Jesus and other cases have shown, the real victim could still be being abused and could still be rescued.
Post by: boogs on October 15, 2013, 02:08:52 PM
You may say why keep it going ? As I said these are clever people and if they stop it would look suspicious...
When my kids were young and we went on holiday the kids ate early put to bed and one of us stayed in with them we took turns... If you want to just do as you like then leave the kids at home or don't have kids at all. Then the problem does not arise ... Shrugs:
Kids are young for such a short time you should enjoy that time with them ... Some people just so self centred they want it all no sense of responsibility. noooo:
That is just MHO and I just hope that what ever happened to that poor child she is and has not suffered ... evil:
I also do not want to see the smug faces of those two ever again. evil: evil: evil:
Sorry rant over redface:
Post by: Nick on October 15, 2013, 02:13:22 PM
I feel sorry for the McCanns to some extent but have nothing but contempt for them for the most part. I would NEVER have done what they did. NEVER
Post by: Baldy on October 15, 2013, 02:15:29 PM
It has often been mentioned in this thread. There is something spooky about them. I have doctors in my family and they are so scientifically focussed they can barely function in normal society. My BiL is almost autistic which is why he went into anaesthetics I guess: felt more comfortable with unconscious people.
I feel sorry for the McCanns to some extent but have nothing but contempt for them for the most part. I would NEVER have done what they did. NEVER
As a fellow parent. Thumbs:
Post by: boogs on October 15, 2013, 02:26:28 PM
It has often been mentioned in this thread. There is something spooky about them. I have doctors in my family and they are so scientifically focussed they can barely function in normal society. My BiL is almost autistic which is why he went into anaesthetics I guess: felt more comfortable with unconscious people.
I feel sorry for the McCanns to some extent but have nothing but contempt for them for the most part. I would NEVER have done what they did. NEVER
Exactly decent parents never would Thumbs: I hope I am wrong and if I am then like you I have a little sympathy.. but whatever the truth I hope they can live with it because either way it is down to them .... eeek:
Post by: apc2010 on October 15, 2013, 02:28:55 PM
It has often been mentioned in this thread. There is something spooky about them. I have doctors in my family and they are so scientifically focussed they can barely function in normal society. My BiL is almost autistic which is why he went into anaesthetics I guess: felt more comfortable with unconscious people.
I feel sorry for the McCanns to some extent but have nothing but contempt for them for the most part. I would NEVER have done what they did. NEVER
Exactly decent parents never would Thumbs: I hope I am wrong and if I am then like you I have a little sympathy.. but whatever the truth I hope they can live with it because either way it is down to them .... eeek:
The money from the books helps......... noooo: oh and the sun exclusives once a year.....
Post by: Nick on October 15, 2013, 02:30:27 PM
Post by: boogs on October 15, 2013, 02:31:10 PM
It has often been mentioned in this thread. There is something spooky about them. I have doctors in my family and they are so scientifically focussed they can barely function in normal society. My BiL is almost autistic which is why he went into anaesthetics I guess: felt more comfortable with unconscious people.
I feel sorry for the McCanns to some extent but have nothing but contempt for them for the most part. I would NEVER have done what they did. NEVER
Exactly decent parents never would Thumbs: I hope I am wrong and if I am then like you I have a little sympathy.. but whatever the truth I hope they can live with it because either way it is down to them .... eeek:
The money from the books helps......... noooo: oh and the sun exclusives once a year.....
Zactly my point ... soo wrong
Post by: Nick on October 15, 2013, 02:32:42 PM
whistle:
Post by: Baldy on October 15, 2013, 02:35:00 PM
Indeed. And the GP salaries whistle:
Do not forget about borrowing a bit of money from the fund to pay the mortgage etc..
Post by: boogs on October 15, 2013, 02:37:51 PM
Post by: apc2010 on October 15, 2013, 02:39:13 PM
http://www.findmadeleine.com/online_store/index.html (http://www.findmadeleine.com/online_store/index.html)
whistle:
I thought this was gonna be like a" where's wally" site........ redface:
Post by: Baldy on October 15, 2013, 02:40:13 PM
http://www.findmadeleine.com/online_store/index.html (http://www.findmadeleine.com/online_store/index.html)
whistle:
I thought this was gonna be like a" where's wally" site........ redface:
lol: lol: lol:
Post by: Darwins Selection on October 15, 2013, 02:51:59 PM
http://www.findmadeleine.com/online_store/index.html (http://www.findmadeleine.com/online_store/index.html)
whistle:
I thought this was gonna be like a" where's wally" site........ redface:
rubschin:
So, you know the name of the Dark/blond-haired German/Dutchman/Englishman aged 25-40 who might have been seen in Portugal carrying a child/doll/dog in pyjamas between 8 and 10 PM six years ago.
Get on the phone to Crimewatch right away.
Post by: Just One More on October 15, 2013, 05:21:15 PM
Did anybody watch it...? Shrugs:
Yeah, put the kids to bed and went down the boozer to watch it........ Thumbs:
lol: lol: lol: lol:
Post by: Barman on October 15, 2013, 06:35:08 PM
Post by: Nick on October 15, 2013, 06:36:52 PM
Post by: Barman on October 15, 2013, 07:31:26 PM
Meanwhile LL says Spank2: Spank2: Spank2: Spank2: Spank2: Spank2:
eyes:
Post by: Nick on October 30, 2013, 08:23:36 AM
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs9.postimg.org%2F4439zme4b%2F601407_195730573944699_407054230_n.jpg&hash=552fe50cc561f3b1fc19299032767a4647ffc858) (http://postimg.org/image/4439zme4b/)
Post by: Baldy on October 30, 2013, 08:53:34 AM
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs9.postimg.org%2F4439zme4b%2F601407_195730573944699_407054230_n.jpg&hash=552fe50cc561f3b1fc19299032767a4647ffc858) (http://postimg.org/image/4439zme4b/)
Thumbs: lol: lol: lol:
Post by: Barman on October 30, 2013, 09:32:08 AM
(https://www.virtual-pub.com/SMF/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs9.postimg.org%2F4439zme4b%2F601407_195730573944699_407054230_n.jpg&hash=552fe50cc561f3b1fc19299032767a4647ffc858) (http://postimg.org/image/4439zme4b/)
happy001
Post by: Landlady on October 30, 2013, 10:01:40 AM
Meanwhile LL says Spank2: Spank2: Spank2: Spank2: Spank2: Spank2:
No LL doesn't Mr. Nick and I applaud the opinions, all of them Thumbs:
Somewhere there is either a body, or a little girl who has been subjected to the most horrendous ordeal.
If it is the former then I pray that there may be some forensic evidence that will be found and link quickly to the killer(s) capture
If it is the latter then I pray that who ever has the child is treating her well and showing her some genuine love and affection
Something inside me also doesn't like/trust these parents and I sadly would not be surprised to find out it was some horrendous scam as it's not just the great unwashed who abuse their children or are amoral eveilgrin:
Post by: Nick on November 09, 2013, 01:30:25 PM
He revealed to me that Maddy is here in Nerja eeek: with a police guard and that she is being held as part of a conspiracy of Freemasons eeek:
There could be munny in this :thumbsup:
He was disguised as a wino with home made shoes and a laydee's hat, so he must be authentic :thumbsup:
Or barking mad rubschin:
Post by: apc2010 on November 09, 2013, 01:32:23 PM
Amazing news. Sitting quietly on the beach earlier I was approached by a man who confessed he was a secret agent eeek:
He revealed to me that Maddy is here in Nerja eeek: with a police guard and that she is being held as part of a conspiracy of Freemasons eeek:
There could be munny in this :thumbsup:
He was disguised as a wino with home made shoes and a laydee's hat, so he must be authentic :thumbsup:
Or barking mad rubschin:
;D ;D call Max Clifford.......no wait... Max and little girls..... rubschin:
Post by: Steve on November 09, 2013, 01:38:47 PM
happy001Amazing news. Sitting quietly on the beach earlier I was approached by a man who confessed he was a secret agent eeek:
He revealed to me that Maddy is here in Nerja eeek: with a police guard and that she is being held as part of a conspiracy of Freemasons eeek:
There could be munny in this :thumbsup:
He was disguised as a wino with home made shoes and a laydee's hat, so he must be authentic :thumbsup:
Or barking mad rubschin:
;D ;D call Max Clifford.......no wait... Max and little girls..... rubschin:
rubschin:
noooo:
How does Nick attract them?
Post by: Miss Creant Commander of the picklement and baking BAb(Hons) on November 09, 2013, 01:49:09 PM
happy001Amazing news. Sitting quietly on the beach earlier I was approached by a man who confessed he was a secret agent eeek:
He revealed to me that Maddy is here in Nerja eeek: with a police guard and that she is being held as part of a conspiracy of Freemasons eeek:
There could be munny in this :thumbsup:
He was disguised as a wino with home made shoes and a laydee's hat, so he must be authentic :thumbsup:
Or barking mad rubschin:
;D ;D call Max Clifford.......no wait... Max and little girls..... rubschin:
rubschin:
noooo:
How does Nick attract them?
Either with sweets or by asking them if they want to see some lovely puppies depends how old they are.;
Post by: Marley's Ghost (Imbiber of Spirits) on November 09, 2013, 02:08:56 PM
happy001Amazing news. Sitting quietly on the beach earlier I was approached by a man who confessed he was a secret agent eeek:
He revealed to me that Maddy is here in Nerja eeek: with a police guard and that she is being held as part of a conspiracy of Freemasons eeek:
There could be munny in this :thumbsup:
He was disguised as a wino with home made shoes and a laydee's hat, so he must be authentic :thumbsup:
Or barking mad rubschin:
;D ;D call Max Clifford.......no wait... Max and little girls..... rubschin:
rubschin:
noooo:
How does Nick attract them?
Either with sweets or by asking them if they want to see some lovely puppies depends how old they are.;
drumroll:
Post by: Landlady on November 09, 2013, 02:23:43 PM
happy001Amazing news. Sitting quietly on the beach earlier I was approached by a man who confessed he was a secret agent eeek:
He revealed to me that Maddy is here in Nerja eeek: with a police guard and that she is being held as part of a conspiracy of Freemasons eeek:
There could be munny in this :thumbsup:
He was disguised as a wino with home made shoes and a laydee's hat, so he must be authentic :thumbsup:
Or barking mad rubschin:
;D ;D call Max Clifford.......no wait... Max and little girls..... rubschin:
rubschin:
noooo:
How does Nick attract them?
Either with sweets or by asking them if they want to see some lovely puppies depends how old they are.;
drumroll: drumroll:
Post by: Nick on November 09, 2013, 02:24:30 PM
Post by: Barman on November 09, 2013, 02:25:24 PM
happy001Amazing news. Sitting quietly on the beach earlier I was approached by a man who confessed he was a secret agent eeek:
He revealed to me that Maddy is here in Nerja eeek: with a police guard and that she is being held as part of a conspiracy of Freemasons eeek:
There could be munny in this :thumbsup:
He was disguised as a wino with home made shoes and a laydee's hat, so he must be authentic :thumbsup:
Or barking mad rubschin:
;D ;D call Max Clifford.......no wait... Max and little girls..... rubschin:
rubschin:
noooo:
How does Nick attract them?
He is a nutter magnet.....
Post by: apc2010 on November 09, 2013, 02:26:25 PM
happy001Amazing news. Sitting quietly on the beach earlier I was approached by a man who confessed he was a secret agent eeek:
He revealed to me that Maddy is here in Nerja eeek: with a police guard and that she is being held as part of a conspiracy of Freemasons eeek:
There could be munny in this :thumbsup:
He was disguised as a wino with home made shoes and a laydee's hat, so he must be authentic :thumbsup:
Or barking mad rubschin:
;D ;D call Max Clifford.......no wait... Max and little girls..... rubschin:
rubschin:
noooo:
How does Nick attract them?
He is a nutter.....
whistle:
Post by: boogs on November 09, 2013, 02:57:38 PM
But good for us Thumbs:
Post by: apc2010 on January 13, 2014, 05:26:34 PM
rubschin:
Post by: Barman on January 13, 2014, 05:34:16 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2538472/British-police-preparing-make-arrests-Operation-Grange-investigation-disappearance-Madeleine-McCann.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2538472/British-police-preparing-make-arrests-Operation-Grange-investigation-disappearance-Madeleine-McCann.html)
rubschin:
doh: I'd forgotten about little Maddy....
Post by: Nick on January 13, 2014, 05:36:31 PM
Post by: Darwins Selection on January 13, 2014, 05:54:36 PM
Were the McCanns insured? rubschin:
PPI ?
Portuguese Police Incompetence?
Post by: Baldy on January 13, 2014, 08:06:26 PM
Were the McCanns insured? rubschin:
PPI ?
Portuguese Police Incompetence?
drumroll: drumroll: ;D
Post by: Just One More on January 13, 2014, 09:24:01 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2538472/British-police-preparing-make-arrests-Operation-Grange-investigation-disappearance-Madeleine-McCann.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2538472/British-police-preparing-make-arrests-Operation-Grange-investigation-disappearance-Madeleine-McCann.html)
rubschin:
doh: I'd forgotten about little Maddy....
Are you Gerry McCann, do I win £5 rubschin:
Post by: apc2010 on January 13, 2014, 09:25:18 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2538472/British-police-preparing-make-arrests-Operation-Grange-investigation-disappearance-Madeleine-McCann.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2538472/British-police-preparing-make-arrests-Operation-Grange-investigation-disappearance-Madeleine-McCann.html)
rubschin:
doh: I'd forgotten about little Maddy....
Are you Gerry McCann, do I win £5 rubschin:
;D ;D ;D ;D
Post by: Baldy on January 13, 2014, 09:32:24 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2538472/British-police-preparing-make-arrests-Operation-Grange-investigation-disappearance-Madeleine-McCann.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2538472/British-police-preparing-make-arrests-Operation-Grange-investigation-disappearance-Madeleine-McCann.html)
rubschin:
doh: I'd forgotten about little Maddy....
Are you Gerry McCann, do I win £5 rubschin:
lol: lol:
Post by: Barman on January 14, 2014, 07:04:15 AM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2538472/British-police-preparing-make-arrests-Operation-Grange-investigation-disappearance-Madeleine-McCann.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2538472/British-police-preparing-make-arrests-Operation-Grange-investigation-disappearance-Madeleine-McCann.html)
rubschin:
doh: I'd forgotten about little Maddy....
Are you Gerry McCann, do I win £5 rubschin:
happy001
Post by: Miss Creant Commander of the picklement and baking BAb(Hons) on January 14, 2014, 02:15:40 PM
A lawyer accused Madeleine McCann’s parents of child neglect as he defended his own client in an “outrageous” courtroom speech.
Gareth Morgan made the shocking claim while acting for a drink-driving mum who left her five-year-old son, who has Asperger syndrome, home alone at night.
Yesterday a friend of Kate and Gerry McCann, both 45, blasted the comparison as “insensitive and plain wrong”.
Check out all the latest News, Sport & Celeb gossip at Mirror.co.uk http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccann-lawyer-gareth-morgan-3020133#ixzz2qNlJ323p (http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccann-lawyer-gareth-morgan-3020133#ixzz2qNlJ323p)
Follow us: @DailyMirror on Twitter | DailyMirror on Facebook
Post by: Nick on January 14, 2014, 02:17:23 PM
Post by: Nick on June 02, 2014, 06:35:22 AM
Post by: Barman on June 02, 2014, 09:49:52 AM
They are digging.How long before Kate and Gerry get arrested? rubschin:
I note that they are not there on this occasion..... whistle:
Post by: The Moan Ranger on June 02, 2014, 03:14:01 PM
Post by: Baldy on June 02, 2014, 05:46:12 PM
Just as the weather is improving too. How very odd.
They could have gone on the piss at a restaurant around the corner.....again.
Post by: Nick on June 02, 2014, 05:59:45 PM
Post by: Baldy on June 02, 2014, 06:10:46 PM
I guess they are onto Thomas Cook as we speak whistle:
One way tickets? rubschin:
Post by: Nick on June 02, 2014, 06:12:50 PM
Post by: boogs on June 02, 2014, 08:43:44 PM
They are digging.How long before Kate and Gerry get arrested? rubschin::thumbsup:
Post by: Steve on June 16, 2014, 03:01:45 PM
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27864606 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27864606)
Quote
However, an adjournment to the libel trial was granted at the court after Mr Amaral sacked his legal team at the last minute. It is the fourth delay in the case.
Post by: Miss Demeanour on June 16, 2014, 06:32:44 PM
Post by: Just One More on June 16, 2014, 06:35:15 PM
Kate McCann looks skeletal . She is obviously trying to demonstrate to the searchers what they are looking for noooo:
lol: ... and no redface:
:thumbsup:
Post by: Nick on June 16, 2014, 06:36:07 PM
I have said it before and I will say it again, I would NEVER NEVER have gone out for dinner and left a 3 year old The Boy asleep at home. NEVER. They deserve to be locked up cussing: cussing: cussing: cussing: cussing: cussing:
Post by: Steve on June 16, 2014, 07:09:44 PM
So they were stupid and wrong and unlucky. But at least one person was extremely evil and surely it's way gone past the time we should be focussing on that instead
Post by: Nick on June 16, 2014, 07:15:46 PM
Post by: Barman on June 16, 2014, 07:22:43 PM
Kate McCann looks skeletal . She is obviously trying to demonstrate to the searchers what they are looking for noooo:
drumroll:
lol: lol: lol:
Post by: Baldy on June 16, 2014, 07:59:58 PM
I have made many regrettable errors in my life but leaving a three year old alone in a strange place while I went out on the piss is not one of them. Friends with kids have talked about this and the verdict is unanimous: NEVER
The arseholes initially claimed they could see the apartment from where they were 'on the piss'...... noooo: Proved wrong!
A child minding service was offered where they were staying.....did they take them up on the cheap offer, considering they were at a restaurant quite a few metres around a blind corner from where the kids were? noooo:
Have they 'dipped' into the charity lately to continue their lifestyle, should they need to make the odd mortgage payment? Shrugs:
Too many 'things' do not add up for my liking. noooo:
Post by: Miss Demeanour on June 16, 2014, 08:06:34 PM
I have made many regrettable errors in my life but leaving a three year old alone in a strange place while I went out on the piss is not one of them. Friends with kids have talked about this and the verdict is unanimous: NEVER
Exactly
For it to be a proper holiday you leave the kids at home :thumbsup:
Post by: Barman on June 16, 2014, 08:08:40 PM
I have made many regrettable errors in my life but leaving a three year old alone in a strange place while I went out on the piss is not one of them. Friends with kids have talked about this and the verdict is unanimous: NEVER
The arseholes initially claimed they could see the apartment from where they were 'on the piss'...... noooo: Proved wrong!
A child minding service was offered where they were staying.....did they take them up on the cheap offer, considering they were at a restaurant quite a few metres around a blind corner from where the kids were? noooo:
Have they 'dipped' into the charity lately to continue their lifestyle, should they need to make the odd mortgage payment? Shrugs:
Too many 'things' do not add up for my liking. noooo:
^^^ wot he said
^^^Sent from my Moto G using Tapatalk
Post by: Baldy on June 16, 2014, 08:10:03 PM
I have made many regrettable errors in my life but leaving a three year old alone in a strange place while I went out on the piss is not one of them. Friends with kids have talked about this and the verdict is unanimous: NEVER
Exactly
For it to be a proper holiday you leave the kids at home :thumbsup:
You are an WAG....and I claim my fiver. Thumbs:
However, I am not sure who BM played for. Shrugs:
Post by: Steve on June 16, 2014, 08:23:02 PM
So much of this case has public opinion contaminated by what that misogynist git Amaral was doing for his own agenda with the UK press that indisputable facts are rarer than rocking horse poo. Even the News of the World that came up with that 'proof you can't see' story actually says well you can but through trees.
There is a limit to how much you can torture people for being stupid, wrong and unlucky. IMHO we're way past that and it gets in the way of finding who really were the criminal(s)
Post by: Nick on June 16, 2014, 08:27:23 PM
Post by: Steve on June 16, 2014, 08:32:12 PM
The twats who went out "for dinner" and left a 3 year old alone. NEVER. If they had been chavs and not doctors with good PR they would have been strung up by now!No they wouldn't.
What do you think the going rate is for leaving a 5 year old alone so you can get blind drunk and then go for a driving lesson and crash the car?
"She was given a 12-month supervision order, ordered to carry out 120 hours unpaid work and told to attend 15 sessions on a thinking skills course."
Post by: Nick on June 16, 2014, 08:35:30 PM
Post by: Steve on June 16, 2014, 08:46:08 PM
That Wail quote does not excuse the selfish bastards
I'm not excusing them, as I said they were stupid and wrong and unlucky.
Post by: Baldy on June 16, 2014, 08:51:46 PM
Would you use a child caring service if you had no idea what checks they made on the staff used?
So much of this case has public opinion contaminated by what that misogynist git Amaral was doing for his own agenda with the UK press that indisputable facts are rarer than rocking horse poo. Even the News of the World that came up with that 'proof you can't see' story actually says well you can but through trees.
There is a limit to how much you can torture people for being stupid, wrong and unlucky. IMHO we're way past that and it gets in the way of finding who really were the criminal(s)
Prolly better that just leaving the poor little mites on their own, while you go on the piss out of eyeshot.
Me and Ex Mrs Baldy took it in turns when friends came around to go out on the piss or got a babysitter in at our expense (who Mrs ex Baldy had checked out) .....and never left my eldest daughter at home alone...NEVER FECKIN NEVER!!!!!
Post by: Baldy on June 16, 2014, 08:58:21 PM
The twats who went out "for dinner" and left a 3 year old alone. NEVER. If they had been chavs and not doctors with good PR they would have been strung up by now!No they wouldn't.
What do you think the going rate is for leaving a 5 year old alone so you can get blind drunk and then go for a driving lesson and crash the car?
"She was given a 12-month supervision order, ordered to carry out 120 hours unpaid work and told to attend 15 sessions on a thinking skills course."
That is still a bit more than they have got......yet. whistle:
Post by: Nick on June 16, 2014, 09:11:51 PM
Post by: Steve on June 16, 2014, 09:24:35 PM
Leaving a 3 year old alone while you go on the piss and she gets killed/raped/trafficked is not UNLUCKY. The end.IIRC didn't I say stupid and wrong as well
Post by: Barman on March 15, 2019, 11:58:57 AM
Post by: Miss Demeanour on March 15, 2019, 08:47:14 PM
"The story of Madeleine McCann, the young girl who went missing while on vacation in Portugal"
Post by: Steve on March 15, 2019, 10:02:39 PM
And then there's the whole lack of morals in making money out of this without adding a shred of original evidence or analysis
All that Netflickers is not gold
Post by: Nick on March 16, 2019, 07:47:07 AM
No point in watching the show as the programme blurb sums it up in its entirety
"The story of Madeleine McCann, the young girl who went missing while on vacation in Portugal"
Yes, it rather spoils the ending....
Post by: Steve on June 03, 2020, 10:13:39 PM
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52914016
'Madeleine McCann: German prisoner identified as suspect'
In just about all the papers too
(https://e3.365dm.com/20/06/2048x1152/skynews-newspapers-fan-4-june_5005380.jpg?bypass-service-worker&20200603220348)
Post by: apc2010 on June 03, 2020, 10:55:05 PM
Interesting
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52914016
'Madeleine McCann: German prisoner identified as suspect'
In just about all the papers too
(https://e3.365dm.com/20/06/2048x1152/skynews-newspapers-fan-4-june_5005380.jpg?bypass-service-worker&20200603220348)
They skint ....... rubschin:
Post by: Barman on June 04, 2020, 03:15:24 AM
Interesting
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-52914016
'Madeleine McCann: German prisoner identified as suspect'
In just about all the papers too
(https://e3.365dm.com/20/06/2048x1152/skynews-newspapers-fan-4-june_5005380.jpg?bypass-service-worker&20200603220348)
They skint ....... rubschin:
Yarp... ::)
Post by: Nick on May 03, 2022, 05:36:11 PM
NEVER would I have gone out to dinner and left a three year old alone in a flat. NEVER
Post by: apc2010 on May 03, 2022, 10:45:53 PM
15 years and all over the news here
NEVER would I have gone out to dinner and left a three year old alone in a flat. NEVER
Thumbs: in a foreign country .... noooo:
Post by: Barman on May 04, 2022, 04:02:37 AM
15 years and all over the news here
NEVER would I have gone out to dinner and left a three year old alone in a flat. NEVER
It was outrageous... evil:
Post by: Steve on May 04, 2022, 03:40:39 PM
But somehow so many people want to forget that and put all the blame on the parents.
Post by: Nick on May 04, 2022, 03:43:50 PM
Post by: Steve on May 04, 2022, 03:46:00 PM
If they hadn't gone out on the piss it would not have happened. If they had been chavs instead of doctors their names would be mud.As Shaw put it: 'If ifs and ans were pots and pans there'd be no need for tinkers'
Post by: Uncle Mort on May 04, 2022, 04:04:03 PM
If they hadn't gone out on the piss it would not have happened. If they had been chavs instead of doctors their names would be mud.
Their names are mud. Everyone they meet already knows about them and even if left unspoken affects everything in their lives. They did wrong but they've had to suffer for it everyday of the past 15 years. I couldn't cope in the same circumstance.
Post by: Barman on May 04, 2022, 05:19:35 PM
But a lot less outrageous than someone who may or may not have been 'Christian B' sneaking in, kidnapping the child and almost certainly killing her
But somehow so many people want to forget that and put all the blame on the parents.
The blame is all on the parents! evil:
We all know there are bad people in the world... Anybody that has had a kid (even second hand like me) cannot imagine leaving them alone at night in a strange place... noooo:
Post by: Steve on May 04, 2022, 05:41:47 PM
'all on the parents' ::)But a lot less outrageous than someone who may or may not have been 'Christian B' sneaking in, kidnapping the child and almost certainly killing her
But somehow so many people want to forget that and put all the blame on the parents.
The blame is all on the parents! evil:
We all know there are bad people in the world... Anybody that has had a kid (even second hand like me) cannot imagine leaving them alone at night in a strange place... noooo:
That's that 'we can't find the killer so we'll heap all the blame on the nearest imperfect person we can find' idiocy.
On that logic Ian Brady and Myra Hindley should never have been found guilty and imprisoned as 'all the blame' was on the parents who didn't keep their children in their sight at all times.
Post by: Barman on May 04, 2022, 06:25:32 PM
That's that 'we can't find the killer so we'll heap all the blame on the nearest imperfect person we can find' idiocy.
Utter bollox Steve... ::)
You reduce the risk to your kids to the absolute minimum that you possibly can while letting them live as normal a life as possible.
Leaving them alone at night in a strange place with the door open while you go out and party is neither of those things... noooo:
They fucked up big time.
Post by: Uncle Mort on May 04, 2022, 06:48:24 PM
Leaving them alone at night in a strange place with the door open while you go out and party is neither of those things... noooo:
Hyperbole doesn't help with your argument noooo:
Post by: Barman on May 04, 2022, 06:58:03 PM
Leaving them alone at night in a strange place with the door open while you go out and party is neither of those things... noooo:
Hyperbole doesn't help with your argument noooo:
Which bit of that is hyperbole...? rubschin:
Post by: Uncle Mort on May 04, 2022, 07:14:59 PM
Post by: Barman on May 04, 2022, 07:17:01 PM
Was the door open? were they partying?
Yes and yes from my memory... rubschin:
Post by: Uncle Mort on May 04, 2022, 07:22:25 PM
Post by: Steve on May 04, 2022, 07:29:08 PM
So you were there then? Maybe you're a suspect.Was the door open? were they partying?
Yes and yes from my memory... rubschin:
And you do realise that 'all on the parents' means no blame at all on anyone else don't you? No blame on the resort that left a message for anyone to read that effectively said 'child available for kidnap', no blame on their friend that said he'd check the children but didn't, no blame on the police that spent weeks telling the British press false stories for kickbacks and above all no blame on whoever actually took the child?
No one least of all the McCanns says the parents were blameless but we've had 15 years of this nasty and idiotic painting them as murderers. They've suffered more than enough of this witch hunting.
Post by: Barman on May 05, 2022, 03:55:15 AM
So you were there then? Maybe you're a suspect.Was the door open? were they partying?
Yes and yes from my memory... rubschin:
And you do realise that 'all on the parents' means no blame at all on anyone else don't you? No blame on the resort that left a message for anyone to read that effectively said 'child available for kidnap', no blame on their friend that said he'd check the children but didn't, no blame on the police that spent weeks telling the British press false stories for kickbacks and above all no blame on whoever actually took the child?
No one least of all the McCanns says the parents were blameless but we've had 15 years of this nasty and idiotic painting them as murderers. They've suffered more than enough of this witch hunting.
::)
They had a duty to protect their helpless child. They completely failed in that primary task of being a parent.
Post by: Steve on May 05, 2022, 07:54:00 AM
Post by: Barman on May 05, 2022, 08:06:59 AM
(https://i.postimg.cc/ppcnVX90/Steve.png) (https://postimg.cc/ppcnVX90)
Post by: Nick on May 05, 2022, 01:57:49 PM
Post by: Steve on May 05, 2022, 03:06:57 PM
For once I agree with BM on this one. They went out and left a 3 year old alone in an unlocked flat. DespicableSo you agree with BM that 0.00% of the blame lies with anyone else including the actual kidnapper and probable murderer?
FFS ::)
Post by: Uncle Mort on May 05, 2022, 03:55:08 PM