Author Topic: Is this a new animal ??  (Read 2906 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 153376
  • Reputation: -50
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Is this a new animal ??
« Reply #30 on: November 12, 2007, 01:52:54 PM »
I tend to worry about the wafer thin statement, I mean how thin is a wafer? Surely it should be called thinly sliced or even sliced thinly? Civilisations have tumbled and crumbled because questions like this have not been addressed.
More to the point – what’s the point of wafer thin?  Banghead

If you can read a newspaper though it, it is too thin to provide a tasty sandwich filling so you have to double/triple the thing… why not just make it thicker?   rubschin:


Now THAT is a very valid point.   It has irritated me greatly for years.

'Wafer thin' simply gets people to use more.

Instead of using one normal thickness slice, they put several thin slices on which actually equates to more than the single 'normal' amount.

The same applies to 'Snack size' sweets, you end up eating 3 little Mars bars 'because they look small', which is more than one regular bar.

The proletariat consists mainly of suckers for such tricks. whistle:

I really love these learning experiences.. honest, ....will there be a test?
No, a teat...  whistle:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline Darwins Selection

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 39138
  • Reputation: 6
  • I mostly despair
Re: Is this a new animal ??
« Reply #31 on: November 12, 2007, 01:58:09 PM »
I tend to worry about the wafer thin statement, I mean how thin is a wafer? Surely it should be called thinly sliced or even sliced thinly? Civilisations have tumbled and crumbled because questions like this have not been addressed.
More to the point – what’s the point of wafer thin?  Banghead

If you can read a newspaper though it, it is too thin to provide a tasty sandwich filling so you have to double/triple the thing… why not just make it thicker?   rubschin:


Now THAT is a very valid point.   It has irritated me greatly for years.

'Wafer thin' simply gets people to use more.

Instead of using one normal thickness slice, they put several thin slices on which actually equates to more than the single 'normal' amount.

The same applies to 'Snack size' sweets, you end up eating 3 little Mars bars 'because they look small', which is more than one regular bar.

The proletariat consists mainly of suckers for such tricks. whistle:

I really love these learning experiences.. honest, ....will there be a test?
No, a teat...  whistle:
Spoken like a true sucker.
I mostly despair

Offline Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 153376
  • Reputation: -50
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Is this a new animal ??
« Reply #32 on: November 12, 2007, 01:59:13 PM »
I tend to worry about the wafer thin statement, I mean how thin is a wafer? Surely it should be called thinly sliced or even sliced thinly? Civilisations have tumbled and crumbled because questions like this have not been addressed.
More to the point – what’s the point of wafer thin?  Banghead

If you can read a newspaper though it, it is too thin to provide a tasty sandwich filling so you have to double/triple the thing… why not just make it thicker?   rubschin:


Now THAT is a very valid point.   It has irritated me greatly for years.

'Wafer thin' simply gets people to use more.

Instead of using one normal thickness slice, they put several thin slices on which actually equates to more than the single 'normal' amount.

The same applies to 'Snack size' sweets, you end up eating 3 little Mars bars 'because they look small', which is more than one regular bar.

The proletariat consists mainly of suckers for such tricks. whistle:

I really love these learning experiences.. honest, ....will there be a test?
No, a teat...  whistle:
Spoken like a true sucker.
evil:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline Snoopy

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 54191
  • Reputation: 0
  • In the Prime of Senility
Re: Is this a new animal ??
« Reply #33 on: November 12, 2007, 05:38:03 PM »
I luv Spam, and christ knows what's in that.  eeek:

When sailing I love a tin of diced cornbeef, a can of oxtail soup ,tin of carrots ,tin of peas all chucked in the pressure cooker yummy with a nice thick piece of bread . Especially this time of year  cloud9: Shite ingredients I know but yummy none the less.


Sounds like a mixture for ground bait ~ and I have no doubt that is what it becomes in a bit of a swell..
I used to have a handle on life but it broke.

Offline Snoopy

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 54191
  • Reputation: 0
  • In the Prime of Senility
Re: Is this a new animal ??
« Reply #34 on: November 12, 2007, 05:41:35 PM »
I tend to worry about the wafer thin statement, I mean how thin is a wafer? Surely it should be called thinly sliced or even sliced thinly? Civilisations have tumbled and crumbled because questions like this have not been addressed.
More to the point – what’s the point of wafer thin?  Banghead

If you can read a newspaper though it, it is too thin to provide a tasty sandwich filling so you have to double/triple the thing… why not just make it thicker?   rubschin:


Now THAT is a very valid point.   It has irritated me greatly for years.

'Wafer thin' simply gets people to use more.

Instead of using one normal thickness slice, they put several thin slices on which actually equates to more than the single 'normal' amount.

The same applies to 'Snack size' sweets, you end up eating 3 little Mars bars 'because they look small', which is more than one regular bar.

The proletariat consists mainly of suckers for such tricks. whistle:

And who was the arse that called these mini Mars Bars ~ "Fun Sized" There is no fun in anything that small ~ ask Ms Faithful (allegedly)
I used to have a handle on life but it broke.