Author Topic: The naivity of policicians  (Read 569 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Snoopy

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 54191
  • Reputation: 0
  • In the Prime of Senility
The naivity of policicians
« on: June 19, 2011, 07:58:31 AM »
CMD has made a major statement (according to the BBC).
In what world does he live?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13825737
I used to have a handle on life but it broke.

Offline Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 153413
  • Reputation: -50
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: The naivity of policicians
« Reply #1 on: June 19, 2011, 08:12:26 AM »
CMD has made a major statement (according to the BBC).
In what world does he live?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13825737

He is a total wanker.... who'd have thought this lot could be worse than the last eh...?  noooo:

Quote from: A liar
The prime minister also said he was determined to keep his election pledge of tax breaks for married couples.

And we should believe that pledge why? Shrugs:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Online Grumpmeister

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 36129
  • Reputation: -24
  • Prankmeister General
Re: The naivity of policicians
« Reply #2 on: June 19, 2011, 04:54:10 PM »
Because he is married and would therefore benefit from it BM?  rubschin:
The universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements. Energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest.

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108870
  • Reputation: -115
Re: The naivity of policicians
« Reply #3 on: June 19, 2011, 06:50:03 PM »
He talks rubbish  cussing:
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline Snoopy

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 54191
  • Reputation: 0
  • In the Prime of Senility
Re: The naivity of policicians
« Reply #4 on: June 19, 2011, 07:23:55 PM »
I never thought I would ever agree with Yvette Cooper (AKA Mrs Balls) but:
Quote
Fiona Weir, from Gingerbread - which campaigns on behalf of single parents - criticised the prime minister.

"David Cameron is right that single mums - and indeed single dads - do a heroic job, but those same parents are about to have government support ripped away from them if they need help securing child maintenance payments from their child's other parent," she said.

"If the prime minister really wants to support heroic single parents, he must withdraw these damaging proposals which would limit access to the CSA [Child Support Agency]."

Since 2008 - when the much-maligned CSA was effectively axed - the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission (CMEC) has collected money from non-resident parents.

But earlier this year, the government said it wanted to encourage separating couples to organise their own payments and was proposing to charge those who did not for accessing the services of the CMEC.

They would be required to pay an upfront fee of £100 (or £50 if they claim benefits), plus an ongoing charge of between 7% and 12% of the money paid.
'Lack of understanding'

For Labour, shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper said Mr Cameron's words were "hollow".

"His government is making it much easier for deadbeat dads to run from their responsibilities by charging mums to use the Child Support Agency," she said.

Mr Cameron also said he was determined to introduce tax breaks for married couples - despite Liberal Democrat opposition to the idea.

But Ms Cooper said such a policy would "reward runaway dads who remarry".

Erin Pizzey, the founder of the first UK's women's refuge, said Mr Cameron was displaying a lack of understanding about the reality of family break-ups.

"There are a lot of reasons why [fathers are] not with their children... not least that women won't let them," she said.

Ms Pizzey said it was wrong to single out men, adding: "There is a vast mass of women who are equally as feckless as the men and we never talk about them."

Bob Greig, from the single parenting website Only Dads, agreed that the prime minister's argument was "too simplistic".

"There are many cultural, employment, financial, [and] legal issues as well which prevent dads from having a full-on relationship with their children post-separation and divorce," he told the BBC.

"Why that isn't recognised in his article in the Telegraph I just don't know."



They all make the points that I had in mind when I started the thread.
I used to have a handle on life but it broke.