Disgusterous

Author Topic: CRB check  (Read 1736 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline GROWLER

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 17808
  • Reputation: 0
Re: CRB check
« Reply #30 on: February 04, 2009, 01:29:08 PM »
And she will have to pay for the privilege of having one!
Not so.

If she is doing 'Voluntary work' for little or no pay, it is free: http://www.crb.gov.uk/default.aspx?page=1846

Growler would have to pay, being a business, although if he were checked as a result of working (briefly) at a youth club it would be free and the check would still hold for Swamp Inc. . .  whistle:

Whatever. Money isn't the main issue here anyway, it's the bloody principle of it.

IT STINKS! cussing:

Sorry old chap, I disagree.

If we put our children in the care others it is a comfort to know they are not perverts or violent rather than allow the likes of Fred West to be scoutmaster or whatever.

Ah ~ if only it worked that way ~ but of course it does not. Dunblane would still have happened. The man was legally in possession of the firearms, cleared to work as a youth leader ~ many had suspicions about him but those are not recorded by the CRB. Ergo no amount of CRB checks would have stopped him.
There is also a difference between that which is recorded by the CRB and those whose names may appear on the sex offenders register.
No system devised by man is ever going to be perfect but the one we have is another political knee jerk reaction that, put simply, is not fit for purpose. Sorry but I have used it often and found it to be flawed. That said I suppose if it stops one pervert then it has done some good.
Remember that the CRB can only record AFTER the event ~ it cannot predict nor does it hold records of suspicions ~ only convictions.

My point. Precisely. 10/10. That's what I should have said in the first place. ::)

Offline GROWLER

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 17808
  • Reputation: 0
Re: CRB check
« Reply #31 on: February 04, 2009, 01:31:50 PM »
I have met her. SHe takes the piss out of Growler summat rotten.  noooo:
 



Mind you, he is a soft target


WWWWHAT!?  Angry9:

Garn! You're a pussy cat really.


WWWHAT!? cussing:

You lot deliberately winding me up today?

I'd show you what a 'pussy' is really like, if only I could get my bloody photo bucket to werk. Banghead

Offline Darwins Selection

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 39138
  • Reputation: 6
  • I mostly despair
Re: CRB check
« Reply #32 on: February 04, 2009, 01:32:36 PM »
And she will have to pay for the privilege of having one!
Not so.

If she is doing 'Voluntary work' for little or no pay, it is free: http://www.crb.gov.uk/default.aspx?page=1846

Growler would have to pay, being a business, although if he were checked as a result of working (briefly) at a youth club it would be free and the check would still hold for Swamp Inc. . .  whistle:

Whatever. Money isn't the main issue here anyway, it's the bloody principle of it.

IT STINKS! cussing:

Sorry old chap, I disagree.

If we put our children in the care others it is a comfort to know they are not perverts or violent rather than allow the likes of Fred West to be scoutmaster or whatever.

Ah ~ if only it worked that way ~ but of course it does not. Dunblane would still have happened. The man was legally in possession of the firearms, cleared to work as a youth leader ~ many had suspicions about him but those are not recorded by the CRB. Ergo no amount of CRB checks would have stopped him.
There is also a difference between that which is recorded by the CRB and those whose names may appear on the sex offenders register.
No system devised by man is ever going to be perfect but the one we have is another political knee jerk reaction that, put simply, is not fit for purpose. Sorry but I have used it often and found it to be flawed. That said I suppose if it stops one pervert then it has done some good.
Remember that the CRB can only record AFTER the event ~ it cannot predict nor does it hold records of suspicions ~ only convictions.
Of course it is flawed, but better than just relying on the vicar thinking they seem OK and regularly attend church.

Sorry Growler, but mini-Moose is only 5 years younger than Myra Hindley when she started. You and we know the Moose is OK, but others don't.
I mostly despair

Online Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108842
  • Reputation: -115
Re: CRB check
« Reply #33 on: February 04, 2009, 01:32:50 PM »
And she will have to pay for the privilege of having one!
Not so.

If she is doing 'Voluntary work' for little or no pay, it is free: http://www.crb.gov.uk/default.aspx?page=1846

Growler would have to pay, being a business, although if he were checked as a result of working (briefly) at a youth club it would be free and the check would still hold for Swamp Inc. . .  whistle:

Whatever. Money isn't the main issue here anyway, it's the bloody principle of it.

IT STINKS! cussing:

Sorry old chap, I disagree.

If we put our children in the care others it is a comfort to know they are not perverts or violent rather than allow the likes of Fred West to be scoutmaster or whatever.

Ah ~ if only it worked that way ~ but of course it does not. Dunblane would still have happened. The man was legally in possession of the firearms, cleared to work as a youth leader ~ many had suspicions about him but those are not recorded by the CRB. Ergo no amount of CRB checks would have stopped him.
There is also a difference between that which is recorded by the CRB and those whose names may appear on the sex offenders register.
No system devised by man is ever going to be perfect but the one we have is another political knee jerk reaction that, put simply, is not fit for purpose. Sorry but I have used it often and found it to be flawed. That said I suppose if it stops one pervert then it has done some good.
Remember that the CRB can only record AFTER the event ~ it cannot predict nor does it hold records of suspicions ~ only convictions.

My point. Precisely. 10/10. That's what I should have said in the first place. ::)

And thus saved us hours  noooo:
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline Uncle Mort

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 21654
  • Reputation: 2
Re: CRB check
« Reply #34 on: February 04, 2009, 01:36:21 PM »
Sorry Growler, but mini-Moose is only 5 years younger than Myra Hindley when she started. You and we know the Moose is OK, but others don't.

The point is that some of the we here don't know.

grumpyoldsoldier

  • Guest
Re: CRB check
« Reply #35 on: February 04, 2009, 07:25:02 PM »
Maybe you could post a pic of your special trousers
Would you like a picture of my special trousers little boy...?
Nah, lets us see your cock...

Offline Miss Demeanour

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 36015
  • Reputation: 2
Re: CRB check
« Reply #36 on: February 04, 2009, 07:27:52 PM »
 eeek:

Have you been on the Sanatogen again  lol:
Skubber

Offline TG

  • Fool Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4677
  • Reputation: 0
Re: CRB check
« Reply #37 on: February 05, 2009, 11:13:34 AM »
Most of the public sector jobs I have applied for recently seem to require a CRB check though in most cases they will arrange it and pay for it or refund the costs.

Mind you, I aint 14.  censored:
I think my cat wants to kill me...