How the hell is this fair on the children or safe for that matter?

[Grumpmeister]

So you have put your own happiness with a sick bastard who has already been jailed for attacking a girl under 13 ahead of your daughters safety? Any normal parent would have kicked him out, not decide to lock their daughters away with a baby monitor so that you can sleep with him at night.

Now you would think that Social Services would be all over this in order to protect the girls given that he has been described by the local authority as a continuing risk but no, they have approved the idea because he would wake her up getting out of bed. 

Really?

So there is isn't even the slightest possibility of him slipping you something and then unlocking the door and 'visiting' the daughters. You may not have considered that, social services may not have considered that but something tells me that the girls certainly would have.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3045494/Mother-locks-young-daughters-inside-alarmed-bedroom-share-bed-paedophile-husband-plan-approved-authorities.html

Have these stupid bastards learned nothing from Rotherham? The protection of the children takes paramount importance, not the right of the rights of the child molester or the stupid bint who has decided to put her daughters at risk because she wants to live with him.

It's only going to be a matter of time before we hear the standard refrain of "Lessons will be learned" but by then it will be too fucking late.

[Barman]

So you have put your own happiness with a sick bastard who has already been jailed for attacking a girl under 13 ahead of your daughters safety? Any normal parent would have kicked him out, not decide to lock their daughters away with a baby monitor so that you can sleep with him at night.

Now you would think that Social Services would be all over this in order to protect the girls given that he has been described by the local authority as a continuing risk but no, they have approved the idea because he would wake her up getting out of bed. 

Really?

So there is isn't even the slightest possibility of him slipping you something and then unlocking the door and 'visiting' the daughters. You may not have considered that, social services may not have considered that but something tells me that the girls certainly would have.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3045494/Mother-locks-young-daughters-inside-alarmed-bedroom-share-bed-paedophile-husband-plan-approved-authorities.html

Have these stupid bastards learned nothing from Rotherham? The protection of the children takes paramount importance, not the right of the rights of the child molester or the stupid bint who has decided to put her daughters at risk because she wants to live with him.

It's only going to be a matter of time before we hear the standard refrain of "Lessons will be learned" but by then it will be too fucking late.

As long as he doesn't vote UKIP eh....?