Author Topic: Could have been worse - might have been foam  (Read 8910 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Marley's Ghost (Imbiber of Spirits)

  • Fool Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4917
  • Reputation: 0
  • What a dead end job . .
Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
« Reply #30 on: September 04, 2007, 12:10:05 PM »
Carbon tetrachloride

That's the badger!!

Bloody memory  evil: It's getting worse as I'm getting . . . (now what's that word? Means not as young.) Oh bugger, I think I'll just go and have a lie down somewhere quiet - I may be gone a while.
"Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end." 

Well, someone had to say it!

Offline Snoopy

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 54191
  • Reputation: 0
  • In the Prime of Senility
Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
« Reply #31 on: September 04, 2007, 12:10:56 PM »
I find myself thinking of other side effects evil:
Bromochlorodifluoromethane
 
Halon 1211 is a trade name for Bromochlorodifluoromethane. It is also known as BCF,Halon 1211 BCF, or Freon 12B1. The chemical formula is CF2ClBr.

It was introduced as an effective gaseous fire suppression agent in the 1960s for use around highly valuable materials in places such as museums, mainframe rooms, and telecommunication switching centers. The production of Bromochlorodifluoromethane and similar Chlorofluorcarbons has been banned in most countries since January 1, 1994 as part of the Montreal Protocol on ozone depleting substances.

This is a volatile extinguishant that should be used only with a breathing apparatus (when volume exceeds 5%).


I have this distinct recollection of BCF being phased in by the RAF in the 60's to replace the old ones which contained something whose name escapes me, but which was much prized as a dry cleaning agent leading to lots of empty fire extinguishers.

Can anyone recall its name?

Probably wrong but the following come to mind as "dry cleaning agents" but I don't know if they were used in Fire Extinguishers.
Tetrachloroethylene. Also known as perchloroethylene (Perc)
Another I recall was CFC 113, a chlorofluorocarbon solvent.
There was something that was marketed, in a little jar with a cloth pad under the screw off lid ... Dabitoff was it's trade name. I think the active ingredient was called something like Carbon-tetrachloride.
I used to have a handle on life but it broke.

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108514
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
« Reply #32 on: September 04, 2007, 12:11:35 PM »
That is the stuff they use in dry cleaners. Stinks!
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 152737
  • Reputation: -50
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
« Reply #33 on: September 04, 2007, 12:12:49 PM »
Carbon tetrachloride

That's the badger!!

Bloody memory  evil: It's getting worse as I'm getting . . . (now what's that word? Means not as young.) Oh bugger, I think I'll just go and have a lie down somewhere quiet - I may be gone a while.
Exposure to high concentrations of carbon tetrachloride can affect the central nervous system.  scared2:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108514
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
« Reply #34 on: September 04, 2007, 12:13:46 PM »
Good job it was CO2 then
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline Snoopy

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 54191
  • Reputation: 0
  • In the Prime of Senility
Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
« Reply #35 on: September 04, 2007, 12:14:49 PM »
Good job it was CO2 then

Yep ~ always look on the bright side of life. lol:
I used to have a handle on life but it broke.

Offline Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 152737
  • Reputation: -50
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
« Reply #36 on: September 04, 2007, 12:18:41 PM »
At my last company we did a project that involved dipping spark plus in Perchloroethylene and then applying a voltage across them to see if the insulator was faulty.

We developed this clever enclosed machine but still all had to wear dosimeters because the stuff was so deadly.

However, at the original factory a worker just dunked the ?plugs in a huge vat of the stuff with no protection at all?  noooo:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline tel

  • Senior Moment
  • ****
  • Posts: 6316
  • Reputation: 1
Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
« Reply #37 on: September 04, 2007, 12:23:16 PM »
There was also trike - trichloroethylene I think.

     RTFM

Offline Grumpmeister

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 35833
  • Reputation: -24
  • Prankmeister General
Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
« Reply #38 on: September 04, 2007, 12:23:47 PM »
At my last company we did a project that involved dipping spark plus in Perchloroethylene and then applying a voltage across them to see if the insulator was faulty.

We developed this clever enclosed machine but still all had to wear dosimeters because the stuff was so deadly.

However, at the original factory a worker just dunked the ‘plugs in a huge vat of the stuff with no protection at all…  noooo:

Was his name Nick perchance?  whistle:
The universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements. Energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest.

Offline Snoopy

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 54191
  • Reputation: 0
  • In the Prime of Senility
Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
« Reply #39 on: September 04, 2007, 12:24:05 PM »
At my last company we did a project that involved dipping spark plus in Perchloroethylene and then applying a voltage across them to see if the insulator was faulty.

We developed this clever enclosed machine but still all had to wear dosimeters because the stuff was so deadly.

However, at the original factory a worker just dunked the ?plugs in a huge vat of the stuff with no protection at all?  noooo:

This original factory wouldn't have been in Russia, India or China would it?
I used to have a handle on life but it broke.

Offline Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 152737
  • Reputation: -50
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
« Reply #40 on: September 04, 2007, 12:25:02 PM »
At my last company we did a project that involved dipping spark plus in Perchloroethylene and then applying a voltage across them to see if the insulator was faulty.

We developed this clever enclosed machine but still all had to wear dosimeters because the stuff was so deadly.

However, at the original factory a worker just dunked the ?plugs in a huge vat of the stuff with no protection at all?  noooo:

This original factory wouldn't have been in Russia, India or China would it?
The UK...  whistle:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline Snoopy

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 54191
  • Reputation: 0
  • In the Prime of Senility
Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
« Reply #41 on: September 04, 2007, 12:26:40 PM »
At my last company we did a project that involved dipping spark plus in Perchloroethylene and then applying a voltage across them to see if the insulator was faulty.

We developed this clever enclosed machine but still all had to wear dosimeters because the stuff was so deadly.

However, at the original factory a worker just dunked the ?plugs in a huge vat of the stuff with no protection at all?  noooo:

This original factory wouldn't have been in Russia, India or China would it?
The UK...  whistle:

Bradford, Leeds, Sheffield? Amounts to much the same thing really  ::)
I used to have a handle on life but it broke.

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108514
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
« Reply #42 on: September 04, 2007, 12:28:36 PM »
Clearly a man who has never been to Doncaster. ::)
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline Snoopy

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 54191
  • Reputation: 0
  • In the Prime of Senility
Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
« Reply #43 on: September 04, 2007, 12:38:10 PM »
Clearly a man who has never been to Doncaster. ::)

Have too but never again ~ Ex SWMBO and my Husband in Law live near there. I prefer to keep a healthy width of the country between us.
I used to have a handle on life but it broke.

Offline Marley's Ghost (Imbiber of Spirits)

  • Fool Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4917
  • Reputation: 0
  • What a dead end job . .
Re: Could have been worse - might have been foam
« Reply #44 on: September 04, 2007, 12:47:59 PM »
Clearly a man who has never been to Doncaster. ::)

Have too but never again ~ Ex SWMBO and my Husband in Law live near there. I prefer to keep a healthy width of the country between us.

Now that's s term I quite like! I'll have to remember that one, it describes the ex-SWTSMBO's new spouse to a 'T'.
"Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end." 

Well, someone had to say it!