Author Topic: Pedants required  (Read 2858 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108845
  • Reputation: -115
Pedants required
« on: November 05, 2007, 10:06:53 AM »
I wrote an article for someone yesterday which included the words "Under Weigh" in teh title.

He has told me it's wrong. I have said that it isn't necessarily wrong, just accurate!

See here:

http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-und2.htm

What do pedants here think?
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline Marley's Ghost (Imbiber of Spirits)

  • Fool Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4917
  • Reputation: 0
  • What a dead end job . .
Re: Pedants required
« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2007, 10:10:26 AM »
Really rather depends on what was meant.

If you were referring to a ship (for example) starting to move, it would be 'Under Way', whereas, if you had been served 15 oz of spuds when you asked for a pound, then there would have been an 'Under Weigh' during the dispensation of said spuds.

Of course, you could have meant something completely different!
"Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end." 

Well, someone had to say it!

Offline TG

  • Fool Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4677
  • Reputation: 0
Re: Pedants required
« Reply #2 on: November 05, 2007, 10:12:06 AM »
I wrote an article for someone yesterday which included the words "Under Weigh" in teh title.

He has told me it's wrong. I have said that it isn't necessarily wrong, just accurate!

See here:

http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-und2.htm

What do pedants here think?

I am not a oedant so I couldnt possibly comment.
I think my cat wants to kill me...

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108845
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Pedants required
« Reply #3 on: November 05, 2007, 10:14:06 AM »
Really rather depends on what was meant.

If you were referring to a ship (for example) starting to move, it would be 'Under Way', whereas, if you had been served 15 oz of spuds when you asked for a pound, then there would have been an 'Under Weigh' during the dispensation of said spuds.

Of course, you could have meant something completely different!

 noooo:
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline Darwins Selection

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 39138
  • Reputation: 6
  • I mostly despair
Re: Pedants required
« Reply #4 on: November 05, 2007, 10:20:22 AM »
I wrote an article for someone yesterday which included the words "Under Weigh" in teh title.

He has told me it's wrong. I have said that it isn't necessarily wrong, just accurate!

See here:

http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-und2.htm

What do pedants here think?

If it is in the context of 'getting started' then 'under way' is the regular useage and 'under weigh' is rather quaint.

However, if the item had anything to do with insufficient weighing of people or objects, then 'under weigh' is the only choice.
I mostly despair

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108845
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Pedants required
« Reply #5 on: November 05, 2007, 10:21:35 AM »
No it didn't. I wasted too much of my youth reading Victorian literature it seems evil:
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline Darwins Selection

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 39138
  • Reputation: 6
  • I mostly despair
Re: Pedants required
« Reply #6 on: November 05, 2007, 10:24:18 AM »
No it didn't. I wasted too much of my youth reading Victorian literature it seems evil:

When Wench surfaces, try shouting "A vast behind Mrs Hornblower". whistle:
I mostly despair

Offline Bar Wench

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 13786
  • Reputation: 0
Re: Pedants required
« Reply #7 on: November 05, 2007, 10:24:29 AM »
 cussing:

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108845
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Pedants required
« Reply #8 on: November 05, 2007, 10:25:24 AM »
I did and it worked!! lol:
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline Snoopy

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 54191
  • Reputation: 0
  • In the Prime of Senility
Re: Pedants required
« Reply #9 on: November 05, 2007, 10:31:33 AM »
Check Fowler's "Modern English Usage" for Under Way and all is explained.

You are in good company though as Thackery, to name but one, made the same error. whistle:
I used to have a handle on life but it broke.

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108845
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Pedants required
« Reply #10 on: November 05, 2007, 10:32:37 AM »
 evil:
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline Uncle Mort

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 21657
  • Reputation: 2
Re: Pedants required
« Reply #11 on: November 05, 2007, 10:36:35 AM »
Quote
The original expression for getting a boat moving has nothing to do with weighing anchor and is “getting under way,” but so many sophisticated writers get this wrong that you’re not likely to get into trouble if you imitate them.



 whistle:

   

Offline Snoopy

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 54191
  • Reputation: 0
  • In the Prime of Senility
Re: Pedants required
« Reply #12 on: November 05, 2007, 10:37:26 AM »
evil:

I take it you checked.



You do have good precedent for using it as two words and Fowler says it should NEVER be used as one word (even if it is fundamentally wrong to spell it Weigh unless referring to weight)


Precisely Uncle Mort
I used to have a handle on life but it broke.

Offline Darwins Selection

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 39138
  • Reputation: 6
  • I mostly despair
Re: Pedants required
« Reply #13 on: November 05, 2007, 10:42:43 AM »
You are in good company though as Thackery, to name but one, made the same error.
I liked 'Sister Josephine' when he did it on 'Bradens Week'  ;D
I mostly despair

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108845
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Pedants required
« Reply #14 on: November 05, 2007, 10:43:46 AM »
Thackray and Thackeray, but not in that order.
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile