Disgusterous

Author Topic: Storm in a teacup  (Read 2601 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 153378
  • Reputation: -50
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Storm in a teacup
« Reply #15 on: November 09, 2007, 03:21:45 PM »
I doubt very much if F1 has a 'vast' impact on the environment compared to, for example, the 600 million motor vehicles in the world or the world's cargo shipping fleet.
Ah... but it is an additional impact, unnecessary while driving to work an back each day would probably be considered necessary by those that have no alternative.

Just as three million new homes will produce an additional impact.
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline Uncle Mort

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 21661
  • Reputation: 2
Re: Storm in a teacup
« Reply #16 on: November 09, 2007, 03:37:16 PM »
Additional yes, vast no. It's no good saving the odd penny here or there if you're wasting thousands of pounds elsewhere.

Offline Darwins Selection

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 39138
  • Reputation: 6
  • I mostly despair
Re: Storm in a teacup
« Reply #17 on: November 09, 2007, 03:42:21 PM »
Additional yes, vast no. It's no good saving the odd penny here or there if you're wasting thousands of pounds elsewhere.
Quite, just ask Growler. :lalalala




I agree with Darwin. . . 
That may top the list of your errors of judgement for the week. noooo:
I mostly despair

Offline Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 153378
  • Reputation: -50
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Storm in a teacup
« Reply #18 on: November 09, 2007, 03:42:52 PM »
Additional yes, vast no. It's no good saving the odd penny here or there if you're wasting thousands of pounds elsewhere.
So why encourage the public to unplug their TV while building three million new homes then?  rubschin:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline The Moan Ranger

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 13952
  • Reputation: 1
  • No surrender
Re: Storm in a teacup
« Reply #19 on: November 09, 2007, 03:57:25 PM »
Imagine if it was to be banned and all that tax was lost! The slack-jawed Jock would shit himself!

Offline Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 153378
  • Reputation: -50
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Storm in a teacup
« Reply #20 on: November 09, 2007, 03:59:53 PM »
Additional yes, vast no. It's no good saving the odd penny here or there if you're wasting thousands of pounds elsewhere.
Quite, just ask Growler. :lalalala




I agree with Darwin. . . 
That may top the list of your errors of judgement for the week. noooo:
rubschin:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 153378
  • Reputation: -50
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Storm in a teacup
« Reply #21 on: November 09, 2007, 04:00:27 PM »
Imagine if it was to be banned and all that tax was lost! The slack-jawed Jock would shit himself!
He looks as tho he has shat himself...  noooo:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108852
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Storm in a teacup
« Reply #22 on: November 09, 2007, 04:03:05 PM »
As has been remarked here before, Gordo's smile looks like "a silver plate on a coffin"
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline Uncle Mort

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 21661
  • Reputation: 2
Re: Storm in a teacup
« Reply #23 on: November 09, 2007, 04:19:53 PM »
Back on topic:

Is this entirely sensible?


Offline Snoopy

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 54191
  • Reputation: 0
  • In the Prime of Senility
Re: Storm in a teacup
« Reply #24 on: November 09, 2007, 04:22:03 PM »
'Bout as sensible as leaving the child in a hotel room whilst you go out on the piss ~ and that seems to be acceptable nowadays.
I used to have a handle on life but it broke.

Offline Marley's Ghost (Imbiber of Spirits)

  • Fool Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4917
  • Reputation: 0
  • What a dead end job . .
Re: Storm in a teacup
« Reply #25 on: November 09, 2007, 06:34:27 PM »
I’m sick of this climate change ecobabble…

Just this morning it was climate change, climate change, blah, blah, blah but the storm tide wasn’t as bad as 1953 – how can that be if it really is a recent man-made phenomenon?

I’m not actually denying it but agree with Darwin that it probably isn’t our fault although HM Gov is do sure it is that we have to face punitive taxes and taxes on larger engined vehicles to prevent it.

Yet….

Formula One (F1 now we have to call it) has a vast impact on the environment.

Not only do the cars consume vast amounts of fuel during the race and practice (and the practice sessions between races) but every other week thousands of tonnes of cars, equipment and personnel are flown (or driven) around the world to each event. At each race weekend, hundreds of thousands of fans are driven, bussed or flown to the circuit at vast cost to the environment. Plus of course, all the journalists and tonnes of TV and radio broadcast equipment and let’s not forget the ‘sky cam’ helicopter or copters that hover above the track for the duration of the event for that ‘special’ camera shot.

I don’t hear HMG calling for F1 (or any other motor sport for that matter) to be banned to reduce climate change. Why?

Wankers.  cussing:

You mean you really don't know? I'm surprised BM.

In a word, Bernie Ecclestone (that's two words actually, but you know what I mean) and his millions of pounds of donations to the Labour party coffers!
"Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end." 

Well, someone had to say it!

Shy Talk

  • Guest
Re: Storm in a teacup
« Reply #26 on: November 09, 2007, 06:41:23 PM »
Back on topic:

Is this entirely sensible?



Ah so thats what they done with her  rubschin:

Offline GROWLER

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 17808
  • Reputation: 0
Re: Storm in a teacup
« Reply #27 on: November 09, 2007, 06:47:52 PM »
Back on topic:

Is this entirely sensible?



Ah so thats what they done with her  rubschin:

The thought has been considered as a possibility.
Wrong thread. ::)

Shy Talk

  • Guest
Re: Storm in a teacup
« Reply #28 on: November 09, 2007, 06:53:31 PM »
Back on topic:

Is this entirely sensible?



Ah so thats what they done with her  rubschin:

The thought has been considered as a possibility.
Wrong thread. ::)

wrong thread but MAYBE right piccy eyes:

Mark

  • Guest
Re: Storm in a teacup
« Reply #29 on: November 09, 2007, 08:15:50 PM »
All the news people seem very disappointed with this non event.

They were looking forward to at least a death and a couple of towns underwater, now they all seem keen to find someone pissed off enough to sue someone for it.

I wish to sue someone cause my house didn't flood and I didn't loose all my worldly goods - a bit far fetched perchance but this is the UK, now where's my claim form  rubschin:


Mark