Disgusterous

Author Topic: Is this a new animal ??  (Read 2900 times)

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108850
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Is this a new animal ??
« Reply #15 on: November 12, 2007, 09:11:19 AM »
Or grow your own?
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

grumpyoldsoldier

  • Guest
Re: Is this a new animal ??
« Reply #16 on: November 12, 2007, 09:33:46 AM »
Wot? Grow your own turkey?

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108850
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Is this a new animal ??
« Reply #17 on: November 12, 2007, 09:34:54 AM »
Yes, all you need is an egg!! (Allegedly) You'd have to feed it pretty heftily to have it ready for XMas. Or use a bike pump rubschin:
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

grumpyoldsoldier

  • Guest
Re: Is this a new animal ??
« Reply #18 on: November 12, 2007, 09:44:13 AM »
Too damn quick for me....A turkey from an egg eh, tasting of ham? What will they think of next?

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108850
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Is this a new animal ??
« Reply #19 on: November 12, 2007, 09:45:37 AM »
You could buy a pig and feed it to the turkey for the same result. I recall when eggs tasted oddly of fish.






















Why did i ever say that? noooo:
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

grumpyoldsoldier

  • Guest
Re: Is this a new animal ??
« Reply #20 on: November 12, 2007, 09:48:22 AM »
I really don't know, fish eggs eh? This convo is getting bloody surreal

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108850
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Is this a new animal ??
« Reply #21 on: November 12, 2007, 09:50:47 AM »
I hear tell that some farmers fed sheep nuggets to cows. Made ' em ill, but the amount of wool they got was fantastic!!
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline Darwins Selection

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 39138
  • Reputation: 6
  • I mostly despair
Re: Is this a new animal ??
« Reply #22 on: November 12, 2007, 11:05:16 AM »
Please note my discretion in letting you ramble on unhindered.

To give the men in white coats time to get there
I mostly despair

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108850
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Is this a new animal ??
« Reply #23 on: November 12, 2007, 11:20:23 AM »
BUY GOOSE
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Misunderstood

  • Guest
Re: Is this a new animal ??
« Reply #24 on: November 12, 2007, 11:49:32 AM »
I tend to worry about the wafer thin statement, I mean how thin is a wafer? Surely it should be called thinly sliced or even sliced thinly? Civilisations have tumbled and crumbled because questions like this have not been addressed.
More to the point – what’s the point of wafer thin?  Banghead

If you can read a newspaper though it, it is too thin to provide a tasty sandwich filling so you have to double/triple the thing… why not just make it thicker?   rubschin:


Now THAT is a very valid point.   It has irritated me greatly for years.

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108850
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Is this a new animal ??
« Reply #25 on: November 12, 2007, 11:50:46 AM »
 noooo:
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline Darwins Selection

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 39138
  • Reputation: 6
  • I mostly despair
Re: Is this a new animal ??
« Reply #26 on: November 12, 2007, 12:18:24 PM »
I tend to worry about the wafer thin statement, I mean how thin is a wafer? Surely it should be called thinly sliced or even sliced thinly? Civilisations have tumbled and crumbled because questions like this have not been addressed.
More to the point – what’s the point of wafer thin?  Banghead

If you can read a newspaper though it, it is too thin to provide a tasty sandwich filling so you have to double/triple the thing… why not just make it thicker?   rubschin:


Now THAT is a very valid point.   It has irritated me greatly for years.

'Wafer thin' simply gets people to use more.

Instead of using one normal thickness slice, they put several thin slices on which actually equates to more than the single 'normal' amount.

The same applies to 'Snack size' sweets, you end up eating 3 little Mars bars 'because they look small', which is more than one regular bar.

The proletariat consists mainly of suckers for such tricks. whistle:
I mostly despair

Offline Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 153376
  • Reputation: -50
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Is this a new animal ??
« Reply #27 on: November 12, 2007, 12:24:05 PM »
I tend to worry about the wafer thin statement, I mean how thin is a wafer? Surely it should be called thinly sliced or even sliced thinly? Civilisations have tumbled and crumbled because questions like this have not been addressed.
More to the point – what’s the point of wafer thin?  Banghead

If you can read a newspaper though it, it is too thin to provide a tasty sandwich filling so you have to double/triple the thing… why not just make it thicker?   rubschin:


Now THAT is a very valid point.   It has irritated me greatly for years.
cloud9:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Misunderstood

  • Guest
Re: Is this a new animal ??
« Reply #28 on: November 12, 2007, 12:37:42 PM »
I tend to worry about the wafer thin statement, I mean how thin is a wafer? Surely it should be called thinly sliced or even sliced thinly? Civilisations have tumbled and crumbled because questions like this have not been addressed.
More to the point – what’s the point of wafer thin?  Banghead

If you can read a newspaper though it, it is too thin to provide a tasty sandwich filling so you have to double/triple the thing… why not just make it thicker?   rubschin:


Now THAT is a very valid point.   It has irritated me greatly for years.

'Wafer thin' simply gets people to use more.

Instead of using one normal thickness slice, they put several thin slices on which actually equates to more than the single 'normal' amount.

The same applies to 'Snack size' sweets, you end up eating 3 little Mars bars 'because they look small', which is more than one regular bar.

The proletariat consists mainly of suckers for such tricks. whistle:

Well, dogs seem to benefit from it.

grumpyoldsoldier

  • Guest
Re: Is this a new animal ??
« Reply #29 on: November 12, 2007, 01:42:52 PM »
I tend to worry about the wafer thin statement, I mean how thin is a wafer? Surely it should be called thinly sliced or even sliced thinly? Civilisations have tumbled and crumbled because questions like this have not been addressed.
More to the point – what’s the point of wafer thin?  Banghead

If you can read a newspaper though it, it is too thin to provide a tasty sandwich filling so you have to double/triple the thing… why not just make it thicker?   rubschin:


Now THAT is a very valid point.   It has irritated me greatly for years.

'Wafer thin' simply gets people to use more.

Instead of using one normal thickness slice, they put several thin slices on which actually equates to more than the single 'normal' amount.

The same applies to 'Snack size' sweets, you end up eating 3 little Mars bars 'because they look small', which is more than one regular bar.

The proletariat consists mainly of suckers for such tricks. whistle:

I really love these learning experiences.. honest, ....will there be a test?