Stop complicating the issue with characteristics of hugely differing aircraft where the speed and mass vary enormously but the basic principle remains the same, namely the airflow across the wing surface causes the lift to overcome gravitational forces.
Most of your argument agrees with mine especially with consideration to the airspeed compared to groundspeed. They have no common factor.
A stationary aircraft facing a headwind speed exceeding its lift factor will take off. Conversely an aircraft facing downwind would never take off. Tat is the reason why aircraft always face into the wind to take off, thus reducing the effort required.
It is the mind boggling aspect of Einstein?s equal and opposite reaction that decides the issue.
All agreed so far?
Despite all of the variables, the issue is; can the aircraft achieve the airflow needed to generate the lift required?
Reason against: As the wheel rotation is always countered there will be no forward motion therefore no lift will occur.
Reason for: As the thrust is exerted onto air and not the ground the wheel speed is immaterial.
Damn you! You are definitely going to be smitten.
The equation stands in my mind as follows:
If the wheels are in a permanent state of equal speed with the runway then the physical state is exactly the same as if the brakes were applied to the wheels.
As an ordinary aircraft does not have sufficient power to overcome the braking effort then it would indeed seem that motion would be impossible, and as such, air flow would not occur. (Excepting wind speed) and so, lift is not attainable.
I must therefore reconsider my position ? at least until I think of something else.
