Author Topic: Ye gods.  (Read 3468 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline The Moan Ranger

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 13952
  • Reputation: 1
  • No surrender
Ye gods.
« on: February 13, 2009, 10:34:31 AM »

Online Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 153428
  • Reputation: -50
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Ye gods.
« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2009, 10:36:22 AM »
 noooo:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108879
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Ye gods.
« Reply #2 on: February 13, 2009, 10:39:14 AM »
 noooo: noooo:
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline Snoopy

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 54191
  • Reputation: 0
  • In the Prime of Senility
Re: Ye gods.
« Reply #3 on: February 13, 2009, 10:42:28 AM »
I wish all three of them well. Poor lad doesn't know what he is in for but credit to him for sticking with the babe.
I think the Sun could have been a bad idea but if it gets them some money to help with the costs fair enough.
I used to have a handle on life but it broke.

Offline The Moan Ranger

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 13952
  • Reputation: 1
  • No surrender
Re: Ye gods.
« Reply #4 on: February 13, 2009, 11:00:28 AM »
He doesn't look physically mature enough to be able to impregnate. Is he sure it is his?

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108879
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Ye gods.
« Reply #5 on: February 13, 2009, 11:01:21 AM »
 rubschin:
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline The Moan Ranger

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 13952
  • Reputation: 1
  • No surrender
Re: Ye gods.
« Reply #6 on: February 13, 2009, 05:06:51 PM »
This story headlines the Evening Standard. IDS is quoted as saying it highlights the case as a "tragic example" of Britain's social decline.

I think he has a point.

Online Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 153428
  • Reputation: -50
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Ye gods.
« Reply #7 on: February 13, 2009, 05:31:44 PM »
This story headlines the Evening Standard. IDS is quoted as saying it highlights the case as a "tragic example" of Britain's social decline.

I think he has a point.
The boy has 'grown up' knowing nothing but labour... he is the spawn of labour... he knows no different than to breed and live off benefits...
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline The Moan Ranger

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 13952
  • Reputation: 1
  • No surrender
Re: Ye gods.
« Reply #8 on: February 13, 2009, 05:41:39 PM »
True BM, but two points:-)

1) He has contributed nothing to the economy, and

2) She is a right munter. How long before someone more easy on the eye takes his parental duties out of the equation?

Sterilise both, forthwith.

Online Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 153428
  • Reputation: -50
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Ye gods.
« Reply #9 on: February 13, 2009, 05:58:35 PM »
True BM, but two points:-)

1) He has contributed nothing to the economy, and

2) She is a right munter. How long before someone more easy on the eye takes his parental duties out of the equation?

Sterilise both, forthwith.
Precisely... it is the labour way... he will feel no responsibility to the sprog or the munter after the first nappy change (his)....
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline GROWLER

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 17808
  • Reputation: 0
Re: Ye gods.
« Reply #10 on: February 13, 2009, 08:22:09 PM »
Chantelle? Sez it all then really.
WHAT an ugly munter btw. lol:
 He must have been desperate to empty his sacks...probably for the first time. lol:

Online Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 153428
  • Reputation: -50
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Ye gods.
« Reply #11 on: February 13, 2009, 08:27:09 PM »
And why isn't the little sod being prosecuted for under-age sex?  Shrugs:
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline The Moan Ranger

  • Administrator
  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 13952
  • Reputation: 1
  • No surrender
Re: Ye gods.
« Reply #12 on: February 13, 2009, 09:17:55 PM »
And why isn't the little sod  (wouldn't have been pregnant if that was the case) being prosecuted for under-age sex?  Shrugs:

A point I made elsewhere - but they are only really interested in paedo's not inquisitive children, thus no prosecution.

I am truly of the opinion that the the ginger munter was impregnated by someone else (over 16) and then realised that said sperm donor could be prosucuted, then bribed baby faced boy to "admit" fatherhood.

The first thing that should happen is for little Alfie to be tested to see if he is capable. Preferably in front of all the combines parents and siblings.

Then shoot them all. Gently. In the back of the head.


Offline GROWLER

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 17808
  • Reputation: 0
Re: Ye gods.
« Reply #13 on: February 15, 2009, 11:06:49 PM »
He doesn't look physically mature enough to be able to impregnate. Is he sure it is his?

Here's your answer:

Two other teenagers have told the News of the World that they could have fathered the child.
Both Richard Goodsell, 16, and Tyler Barker, 14, said they had slept with Chantelle at around the time she would have become pregnant, and claimed that she also had several other sexual partners.
Richard, who alleged to the paper he stayed in Chantelle's bed with the consent of her parents Penny and Steve, and without using any contraception, said he plans to demand a DNA test is carried out.


The local 'bike' then it seems.  ::)
All beggars belief, and WE'LL all end up picking the tab up for this shagging fiasco. Angry9:

Offline Uncle Mort

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 21677
  • Reputation: 2
Re: Ye gods.
« Reply #14 on: February 16, 2009, 09:14:38 AM »
I look at my two thirteen year olds and think "Where did I go right"