I know this has been hyped up in the meeeejjjaa
.......
The notoriety of the Baby Peter case is such that all three convicted people are likely to be given new identities upon release to protect them from vigilante attacks, according to the probation union Napo.
In May, Connelly and Barker were given minimum terms of five and 12 years for causing or allowing the death of Peter.
In a separate court case, Barker was also given a life sentence for raping a two-year-old girl.
Peter had more than 50 injuries, including fractured ribs and a broken back, when he was found dead in a property in Penshurst Road, Tottenham, in August 2007.
It emerged Owen had changed his name to avoid being connected to the killing of Peter. Surely if it is too dangerous for these people to be released into society due to fear of vigilante action then they should be kept locked up and 'safe'
They are capable of changing their names and appearance of their own accord when they are released. I presume they will be found accommodation far away from their 'home'. The other children have been put into permanant care anyway and they will have been given new 'skills' in prison which they can use to reinvent themselves with
Why then does the public have to fork out money to help 'protect them'
