0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
But forget about Mart! And Dita, alas! I must here air my Unified Field Theory of Frilly Things. Most things are sold as commodities in a sense. A litre of milk costs more than half a litre. This does not apply to underwear. Imagine it’s December 23rd and you are in Central Manchester and you have to buy a Crimble prezzie for the missus. Underwear always works. Now you can spend a lot at Harvey Nicks or Selfridges on “Love, Kylie” or “Elle MacPherson ‘Intimates’” or you can buy five panties for a tenner at Primark. One of those paths is a false economy. One of those will have you kipping on the sofa ’till Easter if you are fucking lucky. My point here is that lingerie is an inverse commodity. The more you pay the less (by mass) you tend to get. It is not at all like pig iron or pork bellies (thank God!). So on the general assumption that in terms of carbon footprint and resource depletion and all that jazz then the more expensive the underwear the better surely? On every count! For the planet, for the prospect of a blow-job, for not sleeping on the sofa for months! And surely getting divorced is a hell of a thing for your carbon footprint.
I bought myself some new underwear today ...nice it is too ...and conforms to those principles No pictures will be provided before anyone asks
CCTV
Quote from: Miss Demeanor on April 17, 2011, 08:19:45 PMCCTV Did you forget to play?
Any excuse to post it. Enjoy!http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PX7jeaXiETA
See ...wimmin do like all that bull
She was putting stuff back...
