Author Topic: Not forgetting little Maddy  (Read 96030 times)

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

Misunderstood

  • Guest
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #465 on: September 19, 2007, 01:17:13 PM »
I'm quite concerned about this...

Like fingerprints before it, DNA was touted as a method of ascertaining with absolute certainty, the identity of the owner of the sample.

It seems that is demonstrably not true any more.

Not a big deal for me as I only have one sibling, but it must throw a large slice of doubt on anyone from a large family that has been convicted on DNA records and just circumstantial evidence.

Very worrying, given the government's determination to establish a nationwide database.   I might have siblings that I don't know about...  eeek:    No-one is safe....  scared2:

Offline Bar Wench

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 13786
  • Reputation: 0
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #466 on: September 19, 2007, 01:18:34 PM »

Very worrying, given the government's determination to establish a nationwide database.   I might have siblings that I don't know about...  eeek:    No-one is safe....  scared2:

I'm pretty sure I do. It's all quite worrying.

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108839
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #467 on: September 19, 2007, 01:20:55 PM »
I'm quite concerned about this...

Like fingerprints before it, DNA was touted as a method of ascertaining with absolute certainty, the identity of the owner of the sample.

It seems that is demonstrably not true any more.

Not a big deal for me as I only have one sibling, but it must throw a large slice of doubt on anyone from a large family that has been convicted on DNA records and just circumstantial evidence.

Very worrying, given the government's determination to establish a nationwide database.   I might have siblings that I don't know about...  eeek:    No-one is safe....  scared2:

Very very good point. The difference in DNA between siblings, expecially identical twins FFS is negligible.
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Berek

  • Guest
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #468 on: September 19, 2007, 01:22:36 PM »
Meg is a twin, this means we could kill someone and her sister COULD get done for it.. rubschin: rubschin:

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108839
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #469 on: September 19, 2007, 01:24:45 PM »
Which brings us neatly back to Cherie Blair  drumroll:
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Berek

  • Guest
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #470 on: September 19, 2007, 01:47:51 PM »
 drumroll:

MargaRita

  • Guest
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #471 on: September 19, 2007, 04:41:43 PM »
So does anyone have any idea which secret society Gerry McCann belongs to?

How can he have phone access to the PM, how can he have top solicitors and PR people (none of whom seem to want payment) , and how can he have rich benefactors throwing money at him?

Sadly, hundreds of thousands of children go missing worldwide every year.   Their parents don't have these contacts or this media coverage.

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108839
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #472 on: September 19, 2007, 04:43:04 PM »
Mason, or something worryingly Catholic (via Popey?).

Hello again. Should you publish your e mail address to the world like that? CHange your profile!
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline Bar Wench

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 13786
  • Reputation: 0
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #473 on: September 19, 2007, 05:25:12 PM »
Should be sorted now. Let me know if it's not as I can see them all anyway as admin.

Offline Grumpmeister

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 36108
  • Reputation: -24
  • Prankmeister General
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #474 on: September 19, 2007, 05:31:02 PM »
How can he have phone access to the PM, how can he have top solicitors and PR people (none of whom seem to want payment) , and how can he have rich benefactors throwing money at him?

Because a little bit of free good PR is worth more than 10 advertising campaigns. As for phone access to the PM, PAYG sims are bugger all these days and there are bound to be spare mobile kicking around government departments.
The universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements. Energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest.

Berek

  • Guest
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #475 on: September 20, 2007, 07:31:57 AM »
lets hope they drop out of the news, i'm sick of the sight of them, even a gang bang with Kate is starting to bore me

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108839
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #476 on: September 20, 2007, 07:34:46 AM »
Would that be the thought of that or have you actually been doing it? eeek:
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Berek

  • Guest
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #477 on: September 20, 2007, 07:47:46 AM »
 whistle:

Offline tel

  • Senior Moment
  • ****
  • Posts: 6316
  • Reputation: 1
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #478 on: September 20, 2007, 08:01:58 AM »
Should be sorted now. Let me know if it's not as I can see them all anyway as admin.

EEK! redface:

     RTFM

Offline Bar Wench

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 13786
  • Reputation: 0
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #479 on: September 20, 2007, 08:03:39 AM »
Should be sorted now. Let me know if it's not as I can see them all anyway as admin.

EEK! redface:

I am all knowing and all powerful! Bwwahahahahahah