Author Topic: Not forgetting little Maddy  (Read 95801 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Misunderstood

  • Guest
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #810 on: November 06, 2007, 02:44:24 PM »
I was then. Waiting for Huw (sp.) Edwards to stop wittering.

OK?

OK!

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108836
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #811 on: November 06, 2007, 02:46:42 PM »
Gerry just broke down and confessed.

Sky New NOW!
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Offline Uncle Mort

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 21648
  • Reputation: 2
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #812 on: November 06, 2007, 02:48:02 PM »
What to ~ murdering Jill Dando?

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108836
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #813 on: November 06, 2007, 03:14:42 PM »
NO, corpse in the boot and the whole lot.
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Misunderstood

  • Guest
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #814 on: November 06, 2007, 03:16:23 PM »
NO, corpse in the boot and the whole lot.

 :lalalala

Offline Barman

  • Administrator
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 153348
  • Reputation: -50
  • Since 1960...
    • Virtual Pub!
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #815 on: November 06, 2007, 03:43:00 PM »
 :lalalala
Pro Skub  Thumbs:

Offline Nick

  • Needs to get out more...
  • ******
  • Posts: 108836
  • Reputation: -115
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #816 on: November 06, 2007, 03:46:20 PM »
I Want CLOSURE
Warning: May contain Skub
Cat sitter extraordinaire
Semi-professional crocodile

Misunderstood

  • Guest
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #817 on: November 06, 2007, 04:05:16 PM »
I Want CLOSURE

As do we all, but not at any price.  There must be a small space left for the truth and a spot of evidence.

Mr Happy

  • Guest
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #818 on: November 06, 2007, 11:52:41 PM »
Six months must be about an eighth of her life.

Maddie aged 4 minus two parents important careers, minus sleep, minus quality time for twins, minus time alone whilst parents dining out...

If posession is 9/10's the abductors, the ones that don't exist, are probably taking the lead...


Misunderstood

  • Guest
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #819 on: November 07, 2007, 12:08:21 AM »
Six months must be about an eighth of her life.

Maddie aged 4 minus two parents important careers, minus sleep, minus quality time for twins, minus time alone whilst parents dining out...

If posession is 9/10's the abductors, the ones that don't exist, are probably taking the lead...



 confused:  That's very profound.  Mind you don't go scorching your brain

Offline GROWLER

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 17808
  • Reputation: 0
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #820 on: November 07, 2007, 12:16:31 AM »
Six months must be about an eighth of her life.

Maddie aged 4 minus two parents important careers, minus sleep, minus quality time for twins, minus time alone whilst parents dining out...

If posession is 9/10's the abductors, the ones that don't exist, are probably taking the lead...



 confused:  That's very profound.  Mind you don't go scorching your brain

Well mine's TOTALLY cabbaged now reading that.

What exactly is he saying...in english like? confused:

Misunderstood

  • Guest
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #821 on: November 07, 2007, 12:20:55 AM »
 ::)  You're expecting a translation?   eeek:

I THINK he's saying...  that in terms of aggregated time of Maddie and family, the abductor (if there is one) is ahead in the percentage of possession of her lifespan. (if there is one)

Offline GROWLER

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 17808
  • Reputation: 0
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #822 on: November 07, 2007, 12:28:36 AM »
::)  You're expecting a translation?   eeek:

I THINK he's saying...  that in terms of aggregated time of Maddie and family, the abductor (if there is one) is ahead in the percentage of possession of her lifespan. (if there is one)

Doesn't add up that, well not in my 'ed it doesn't. noooo:
Does it really matter anyway? noooo:

Offline Darwins Selection

  • Power Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 39138
  • Reputation: 6
  • I mostly despair
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #823 on: November 07, 2007, 08:59:24 AM »
Doesn't add up that, well not in my 'ed it doesn't. noooo:
Does it really matter anyway? noooo:

Yer 'ed?

Nah!  ;)
I mostly despair

Mr Happy

  • Guest
Re: Not forgetting little Maddy
« Reply #824 on: November 07, 2007, 11:19:32 PM »
Six months must be about an eighth of her life.

Maddie aged 4 minus two parents important careers, minus sleep, minus quality time for twins, minus time alone whilst parents dining out...

If posession is 9/10's the abductors, the ones that don't exist, are probably taking the lead...



 confused:  That's very profound.  Mind you don't go scorching your brain

Well mine's TOTALLY cabbaged now reading that.

What exactly is he saying...in english like? confused:

In my defence may i offer up two badgers, a speckled hen, an old bob and whatever else was in my magic cupboard.

It is an interesting point though, perhaps tongue in cheek in this instance.  There was that young boy that went missing about twenty years ago, surely those that abducted him will simply be ma and pa in his eyes.

Latest news is that Kate has been told not to cry in front of cameras in case the abductor is getting off on it.  Well that must be why she looks like she doesn't give two shits...